KalamityKel

my head hurts!

Seabag Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Flip Flops and leggings on men ? > > OMG, were back in "Hipster" teratory now aren't > we. I've yet to see this sight, but will keep 'em > peeled I indeed witnessed this yesterday evening in Camberwell. What was more disturbing was the state of the gentleman's toe nails *shudders* I probably wouldn't have noticed otherwise!

One huge bang though relating to such celebrations? Unlikely...

Seabag Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Flip flops > > Particularly on cargo short wearing shortarsed > estate agents/city boys Or with men wearing leggings!

Local elections

unlurked Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > Hmm but its the same know everything/know better > than everyone else attitude that is the same > style. So in theory that could also be your good self no?

Haha took long enuff!

What does age have to do with the proposed planning application? Or are you simply commenting generally rather than to this specific issue?

spider69 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Richy86 Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > I really dont understand why anyone would want > an > > iceland instead of an M&S or a Waitrose? Both > of > > which would be a fantastic addition to LL. > > > > Iceland massively drags the place down. > > > > Bring it on I say. > > > When you get a little Older you might understand. You might also want to find out what the plans are all about before making such comments too Richy86

beards

Ok "loop hole" was probably not the greatest term of phrase to have used however... I stand by my point that what is the point of having classifications and indeed a planning department, if businesses can come in and do what they like anyway? Where is the control? Clockworkorange - It has nothing to do with whether a shop space is left empty or not. The classifications are there for a reason - to keep a balance of the type of trades available in an area. I'm sure a RETAILER would happily have taken the space in question. There's no need to have another eatery in the area to which this issue has already been addressed when planning was processed AND refused. Would your opinion be different if another indian restaurant or estate agent took the space? I bet it would...

Some people, I hear, wouldn't classify pizza as "food"... perhaps that's Jeremy's point? ;-)

James Barber Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hi clockworkorange, > So owners propose large rent rises to existing > businesses. They close. Property sits empty for a > few months. The owner bring in a non shop > business. At some point high street like Lordship > Lane stop being high streets and start to wilt as > only people wanting to buy a house or a coffee > visit. Doesn't sound like a recipe for long term > success. > > Lordship Lane has a remarkably low number of void > properties. Keeping at least 50% of properties as > A1 is a key part of that which is why we have such > policies in place and cross-party have defended > this from being userped. Yet it would appear the intentions for this property are different? I don't understand - planning for change of use was already refused yet gathering from other things already mentioned that doesn't matter because of a loop hole in the system? Is this really right?

No clue about IPhones so forgive me if functionality doesn't operate the same as "normal" smart phones :-) BUT are you sure you haven't got data roaming switched on? Are you fooled (fooled by which I mean the app doesn't need to be update as often as it says it does) by the "this app needs updating" and press ok to update which might then be connecting to data roaming to complete the process?

artificial grass

DrinkingBuddy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > A1 can be converted to A3 for a period of up to > two years without permission. What's the point of classification then?

watching/listening to audience participation

I believe there have been rumours floating around for sometime that the "owner" (I only mention this as heresy) was going to open some kind of eatery regardless of the refusal for change of use. I had hoped the owner would be sensible and considerate to the concerns already raised. A shame if that's not so...

and a tube

"opportunistic thieving" when applied to breaks ins...

A2214 London - A2214 East Dulwich Grove in North Dulwich closed in both directions between the Dulwich Village junction and the Green Dale junction, because of a burst water main and emergency repairs. Diversion in operation - bus route 37 is diverted via Dulwich Village and Calton Avenue. http://www.bbc.co.uk/travelnews/london

You dont need me to tell you where the nearest mcds are surely ;-)

Must it b a spouse? ;-)

yeah!

I think the main point here is that you trusted complete strangers, regardless of whether they were recommended or not, to externally have full access to your computer... brave or stupid time will tell, on which you cannot possibly rely on any recommendation just yet. I'm sure they are "fine" and carry a good reputation. I personally don't sit comfortably with this method of fixing your computer unless you are already acquainted with the company and I think it is bad practise from the company itself for this service to be offered straight off. Why didn't you go to their "shop"/premises with said machine like you did with PC world? Was this suggested to you?