KalamityKel

a bit out dated no?

Do you have a reason to get out of bed? Think on it ;-)

unlurked Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Mick Mac Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Being what ? > > Something like an events licence is no longer > required if certain criteria are met. Do not know > the detail but no licence no fee no licence > application etc. Also smaller venues can have > bands that couldn't before. Not quite true and potentially a little misleading there unlurked - there are licences just not the entertainment licence as it once was. The type of places that do and have always had live music (places that have increased the level of interest) are those that have premises licences already which is a requirement to such establishments to have live music so I don't think you could attribute the licensing thing to what's going on in ED. Yes the "entertainment licence" isn't much in existence now there are other restraints on places to control any ol' venue doing what they like. I think the more identifiable reason for the increase and better choice of live events in the area is the effort many people have gone to to improve what's available. TheGooseIsOut is one example...

*Passes AC a pack (or 4) of biscuits*

Why just women? *sigh*

I think the key bit is the slightly/possibly over intoxicated state of mind... now im not saying there is anything wrong with ED and its offerings in other circumstances... i simply couldnt possibly comment ;-)

Frankito Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Ffs, it's only a supermarket... Just build it and > let's get shopping...!!! I do prefer Waitrose over > M&S although I realise I can't be too fussy in > these uncertain times! :0) What a perfect idea! Especially right next door to where you live yes? How easy is it for others not to understand the effects it will have on neighbouring buildings especially when they dont live nearby or have any understanding of the proposed work - ooo sounds much like m&s too!

Is this not just another case of formula V breast is best? Next week there will probably be another "report" contrary to this one...

Exactly!

James Barber Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > After a refused planning application has been > refused their is no further appeal process. An > applicant can only take such a decision to court > IF they think they can prove the prccess wasnt > correctly followed. > And what about an entirely NEW application? The whole thing will start all over again.

No doubt it'll be appealed yet again demonstrating further their lack of consideration and interest in the local area (it's neighbours!). I't just greed on their part really *shrugs*

Erm... why would people who are supposedly "grown up" need to use such words anyway? Surely that just demonstrates lack of vocabulary?

I'm a little confused as to the point of this thread - are you complaining that this particular set of lights is a continuous issue and traffic layout etc needs to be reconsidered? Or are you commenting generally that ALL lights are dangerous and everyone whether you are a road user or pedestrian needs to be more considerate of their surroundings?

Telstone... what are these "social groups" that you're on about?

Its no longer summer...

who? ;-)

http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?29,1189805

Oh stop it both of you! Acting like children and further demonstrating the point of this thread is only making you both look silly. There is no need to provoke or respond to each others comments in the way that you are.

When might we hear the results of the appeal from last Wednesday?

Nuts...

Anyone for cheese on toast?

Elastic bands

Romnarz Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > If the coop are daft enough to think that people > are stupid and want to shop 24/7 then let them. I > cant see there being a huge number of cars > fighting for a parking place at 2 am.Most big > supermarkets have stopped all hours opening > because there was NOT enough demand. When are people going to understand they hadn't applied for the amendment with the intention to actually use the hours given (if it was granted...) but for the option to do so if they wanted to?! It's not rocket science.

If you're open minded to travel you'd be better offer bus hopping to vauxhall (if that's the way you're going to go). Any bus to Camberwell then choice of 185, 36 and 436... I'm surprised it too you that long thought, was it the time it took from vauxhall to lambeth bridge?

Itatm just remember some councillors are known for saying things that are completely untrue then deny saying what they said... blah blah blah. Unless its all made official - actual facts - you really cant/shouldnt take much seriously. A thing that annoys me with all this drivel on statistics over quality of schools is surely ALL schools should be at a high level regardless if theyre new or old and how can anyone possibly predict the standard of a school that doesnt exist? Is this just a ploy,preying on parents that, yes want the best for their children, but are gullible to the unrealistic lines fed by councillors who will support council plans just because theyre led to believe what they hear/read? Would be nice,in and ideal world, there werent any hidden agendas whether based on politics or personal gain (we all want to be liked dont we?) Ugh!