KalamityKel

"Favouritism" ... Pah! :p

sk1009 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > After my daughter told me what she had seen (which > she did so right away) I went outside instantly > trying to see if I could spot anyone wondering > around my street, but I didn't see anyone > suggesting that the guy had either run off or went > hiding somewhere after he saw my daughter. So in > response to those comments that say I should've > contacted 101, there really was no point in > calling the police when the person had disappeared > and no damage has been caused to my property. Not to report it? What a ridiculous comment to make. How are the police meant to be aware of potential crime if it's not reported even if there is nothing that could be done at the time. Crime prevention is key. What if, what you witnessed/heard from your daughter then resulted in someone else being burgled, robbed or worse? If the police do not know of troubled areas they can't patrol or keep an eye out. As a community we all have a responsibility to prevent crime where possible.

aquarius moon Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > So I guess the heating systems in the winter are > all associated with age also: > > 185/484/3/122 warm & cosy > > P12/P13/343 comfortable > > 37 you hope to reach the end of your journey > before frostbite sets in! > > Don't know about the 176 as I rarely use it. *"185/484/3/122 warm & cosy & really smelly in wet weather"*

10 years... did something happen then that made it different?

Erm... yes quite right raebel *insert sarcasm* I dont see that any action - whether a seat is offered or wanted by either side makes it in anyway sexist. If men were able to carry children would this be an issue? Besides anyone with a brain would recognise not just mum to be maybe needing a seat for various health reasons but also from a safety view fir unborn child.. travelling on public transport can be dangerous. Sudden jerks (movement from vehicle not passengers), and then the possibilty of others knocking into you... doesnt take a rocket scientist to see the potential risks. In the case of an mp in session not having a seat we werent there so dont really know what happened. Im sure HR or whatever equivalent would have made arrangments addressing situations like this. Whether someone chose to stand, for reasons perhaps as identified previously on this thread, or whether it was sheer pig headedness of colleagues (i know... strong possibility!) We cant say. To claim "sexism" over things like that? Its a shame more attention isnt given in proper sexist issues

Blimey that's some fall off ya bike to knock yourself out!

Is it not getting a bit late in the evening now for effective tort now?

*yawns*... think about it... it's hardly new news

a bit out dated no?

Do you have a reason to get out of bed? Think on it ;-)

unlurked Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Mick Mac Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Being what ? > > Something like an events licence is no longer > required if certain criteria are met. Do not know > the detail but no licence no fee no licence > application etc. Also smaller venues can have > bands that couldn't before. Not quite true and potentially a little misleading there unlurked - there are licences just not the entertainment licence as it once was. The type of places that do and have always had live music (places that have increased the level of interest) are those that have premises licences already which is a requirement to such establishments to have live music so I don't think you could attribute the licensing thing to what's going on in ED. Yes the "entertainment licence" isn't much in existence now there are other restraints on places to control any ol' venue doing what they like. I think the more identifiable reason for the increase and better choice of live events in the area is the effort many people have gone to to improve what's available. TheGooseIsOut is one example...

*Passes AC a pack (or 4) of biscuits*

Why just women? *sigh*

I think the key bit is the slightly/possibly over intoxicated state of mind... now im not saying there is anything wrong with ED and its offerings in other circumstances... i simply couldnt possibly comment ;-)

Frankito Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Ffs, it's only a supermarket... Just build it and > let's get shopping...!!! I do prefer Waitrose over > M&S although I realise I can't be too fussy in > these uncertain times! :0) What a perfect idea! Especially right next door to where you live yes? How easy is it for others not to understand the effects it will have on neighbouring buildings especially when they dont live nearby or have any understanding of the proposed work - ooo sounds much like m&s too!

Is this not just another case of formula V breast is best? Next week there will probably be another "report" contrary to this one...

Exactly!

James Barber Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > After a refused planning application has been > refused their is no further appeal process. An > applicant can only take such a decision to court > IF they think they can prove the prccess wasnt > correctly followed. > And what about an entirely NEW application? The whole thing will start all over again.

No doubt it'll be appealed yet again demonstrating further their lack of consideration and interest in the local area (it's neighbours!). I't just greed on their part really *shrugs*

Erm... why would people who are supposedly "grown up" need to use such words anyway? Surely that just demonstrates lack of vocabulary?

I'm a little confused as to the point of this thread - are you complaining that this particular set of lights is a continuous issue and traffic layout etc needs to be reconsidered? Or are you commenting generally that ALL lights are dangerous and everyone whether you are a road user or pedestrian needs to be more considerate of their surroundings?

Telstone... what are these "social groups" that you're on about?

Its no longer summer...

who? ;-)

http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?29,1189805