maxxi

woodrot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Oddly enough, yesterday I saw some bored looking > model in a fur hat standing beside a dog shit bin > just of LL, whilst some Nathan Barley took her > pic. This is actually true. Foxtons latest ploy to increase viewings. Will be accompanied by the caption "ideally situated for easy access to state-of-the-art pet facilities"

SFL to revitalise Scottish footy by re-merging the Premier League with the rest and renaming their leagues Premiership, Championship and Div 1 with play-offs etc etc... Stroke of genius or flogging a dead horse? Re tonight - about as interested as I'd be if it were a genuine youth game.

*Bob* Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > For the record, of course I 'buy into' Movember. > Can there really be any reasonable reasons for not > doing so?! Apart from a shed load of blokes growing dodgy 'taches without any sponsorship etc. but rather to convince the world they are charitable angels - like getting to wear a 'flag-day flag' for a whole month without actually donating.

eh?

Otta Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Surely it's a matter of time before the Society of > Black Lawyers have a word with this bloke and tell > him to shut up. Or they might never be asked to get involved with the embryonic Federation of Black Players...

music for a hundred tv ads

Possibly because the increasing bleakness of staring at one another over a congealing home-cooked nigella is marginally worse than repeating "isn't it great to get out" and saying "lovely" to a bored p/t minimum wager as a plate of warmed-up under seasoned slop is deposited close to ones lap. Treats aint what they were.

Here & Now are still going if experimental directionless collective hippie rock bangs your (planet) gong maan. "twinkle twinkle little star"

What - you mean what you read somehow defines you? Cor that's brill!

AFC's travelling contingent will be their biggest crowd of the season.

If it's all accompanied by a loud wailing sound you are probably in the wrong car.

maxxi Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > El Pibe Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > are quids and I doing wishful thinking with > west > > ham's draw? > > I'm way beyond just wishful thinking... > > "BFS's claret & blue fantasy army!" I love fantasy football me :) (Magpies were terrible though) Table has a strange look to it... 6 West Ham 7 Tottenham 8 Arsenal

silverfox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I once had the misfortune to fly back from Chicago > to London with what I will call a child with a > baby onboard. For six or so miserable hours she > insisted on walking up and down the aisle with her > breast hanging out trying to force a jet-leggemd, > exhausted, child to suckle her when the child was > obviously fast asleep. Attention seeking or what? Are you sure this wasn't just a new optional extra from Virgin Air?

More worrying that any half wit can pass a driving test and then ignore/forget most of the things they are taught and drive like selfish morons who regard anything that doesn't weigh a ton and isn't covered in steel as a fucking nuisance. But yeah - insurance is the key, of course it is. Just make sure you ask the cyclist while you're peeling them off your bonnet. Because as a driver all I really care about is my no claims bonus.

I think it was down to pressure from Patten and his Govt. friends to make them (the Govt.) look 'proactive' when they appoint yet another 'new broom'. Also takes the focus away from the whole issue of privileged and powerful men being involved in paedophilia and onto the BBC - bloody licence fees, bloody Guardian reading red revolutionaries, bloody intellectual chattering classes, etc. etc.

???? Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > Apparently the BBC are trawling the EDF 'cos they > hear New Nexus has some truly explosive stuff to > report.... If the Beeb don't want it maybe the SoBL will (provided it's baseless enough). "J'accuse sans preuve" is the new black mode du jour.

It's no biggie. There are plenty of ads aimed at women/girls/ladettes that portray men/boys/lads in a bad or buffoonish light. I think it appeals to the infantile "Boo, girls/boys* are rubbish!" pov one sees on hen/stag nights and in all-male/female work environments. The main aim is to stop the viewer considering the product itself which is invariably pretty crappy. *delete etc.

It is sexist - because it shows a very controlling woman who - in the context of the ad - I assumed did all that stuff because she didn't want/couldn't trust what she considered to be her dim hubby involved. That's how it came across to me sisters. Edited for spulling

*Bob* Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Surely it's not enough that the entire BBC reduced > to rubble, offices razed to the ground and every > employee thrown off a cliff into a snake pit? You've seen the BBC Christmas schedule then?

thephatmaster Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Lol- did think there wasn't going to be a punk > rock pub here or anything I thought you said you were young....? If there was a Punk pub in ED it would be full of middle aged men sighing nostalgically into their snakebites.

El Pibe Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > are quids and I doing wishful thinking with west > ham's draw? I'm way beyond just wishful thinking... "BFS's claret & blue fantasy army!"

Arsenal 3 Fulham 2 Everton 1 Sunderland 2 Reading 1 Norwich 1 Southampton 1 Swansea 2 Stoke 0 QPR 2 Wigan 2 West Brom 1 Aston Villa 0 Man Utd 3 Man City 1 Tottenham 2 Newcastle 2 West Ham 3 Chelsea 3 Liverpool 1

The SoBL's scattergun approach to the issues right now may be partly to deflect attention from the fact that they complained to the police about Clattenberg based on media reports rather than first-hand accounts or evidence. Knee-jerk lawyering prompted by the meeja must be a little embarrassing for them. "M'lud, I submit it is deffo true coz I read it in the paper."

the-e-dealer Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > lol yes apparently we will all go to sleep on 20th > December and wake up somewhere else or some such > rubbish. That's me and every other insomniac buggered. Is it time related? A good long sleep and you wake up in Fiji but a catnap condemns you to Farnham?

wait...