Otta

StraferJack Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Tell us Anna. Why might that be? Lest anyone put > words in your mouth > > And "holier than thou ". Where does that come > from again ? Because fans in this country despite claims of disgrace and morality actually couldn't really give a shit if he plays for Uruguay or not, just so long as he isn't beating their team in the PL. Nothing anti Liverpool, just pro their own teams. I'm certain you are well above all that though.

FFS She didn't. You've decided what she and all Liverpool fans think and are doing pretty well at putting words in to their mouths, so what's the point even bothering. Your posts suggest to me that you're actually quite please Liverpool are going to get their's too for having supported their player rightly or wrongly. Go ahead call me a victim.

Neymar in the first match come to that.

StraferJack Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > > Liverpool fc hoped they would benefit from his skills. They haven't. Are you fir real? First time in the CL for a few years and mightyr close to the league. That's hardly not benefitting.

Can I choose the people and can you make it 5m? No point killing a bunch of strangers for a two bed terraced in ED.

At least City are the only decent team we play without him. And the derby.

Last word I'll say on this. I think this ban will be an inconvenience to Suarez, he'll lose his chance to be the big star at this WC. In the long run his clever PR Team will probably make it work for him somehow. For me Liverpool FC are the biggest losers as a result of it, and yes I feel they have been harshly punished for something completely out of their control after having kept him grounded for the season. But I'll never convince most of you so fuck it. Agree about Blatter MrBen.

"If he had done that on a street corner after a night out, he'd be up on an ABH charge and common assualt." To be fair, it's more likely the person he'd done it to would be stamping on his head on said street.

Nonsense. They are avoiding paying tax by (legally moving it). May not be illegal, but they've spotted a loop hole and are using it to avoid paying tax here. That is tax avoidance. I use Amazon all the time by the way.

I know Suarez and the biting thing is "out there" and inexcusable, but what has basically bugged me the last couple of days is comments like "cheating scum" because when it comes to actual cheating, he's no worse than a ton of other players in the PL and all over the world. Once again, the worst thing he has ever done for me is the hand ball in the last WC. Blatant cheat, and a pretty clever / cynical thing to do. The biting is just bizarre, but at the end of the day, it didn't cost Italy anything the other night, they just lost.

StraferJack Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Wenger offering sheffield utd a replay when kanu > and over mars combined to score is the first > example that popped into my head > > Fowler telling a ref it wasn't a penalty Both a loooooooooong time ago in football terms. Can you imagine a striker these days actually telling a ref it wasn't a penalty? Most of them are going to ground trying to win a penalty. I'd love to see stuff like that, but can't imagine it at top level these days.

Still, Liverpool started pretty well last season without him, so fingers crossed...

I want them to get rid, but that has just become a lot harder. Do you people really think football is still an honourable gents game? It's a nasty corrupt money fuelled entertainment industry. Why the hell would YOU be embarrassed? Like they care about you the little individual. And you haven't remotely answered my issue with this by saying this is a third offence. It was not his third offence in a Liverpool shirt. His club paid for that offence, and he could still represent his country. Is it so hard to see why that is a bit shit on his club? I have never claimed he is anything other than a mentalist. I just want the team I support to have the best chance they can next season, and that means he's available to play or be sold. We can sell, but only for a cut price now.

Believe me, I'd happily see him sold.

I don't deny he's a twat, I said that from the beginning. It's you and SJ who seem to keep suggesting I'm defending him. I'm not. I simply think the ban for this WC incident is harsh on LFC and Brendan Rogers.

StraferJack Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I think Liverpool fans should focus their ire in > Suarez Do you honestly think any Liverpool fan is not angry at him and doesn't think he's a complete tool? > Club. Country. Doesn't matter to him. He could do > the same anywhere now as he has proven. You're probably right, it makes no difference to him. BUT This is my issue When banned for Liverpool for something he did in a Liverpool shirt, he was free to represent his country. Why should Liverpool suffer for something he did on international duty? That is not me playing victim Liverpool, that is me thinking this seems genuinely unfair.

So his country who were responsible for him at the time, lose him for one match (they won't get pst their next match I don't think), and Liverpool lose him until the end of October. If I say that seems a bit unfair to me am I playing the victim? Just to be veeeeeery clear for SJ & Co, I don't think FIFA have done this to pick on Liverpool FC. But I think that they have failed to consider his club who managed to manage him well all last season, whilst barely punishing his country who have not only supported him (like LFC did) but have actively tried to lie his way out of it. Long international ban would have been fairer IMO. And not that anyone of you will believe me, but I'd say that if it wasn't a Liverpool player to. This is the first time they've banned from all footy for something other than drugs. It sets a precedent.

Surely what with a new primary school to be opened on the police station site, there is just no need to build another one school in dulwich. Saying it's for Nunhead is stupid if none of them will meet distance criteria. Harris Nunhead on the hospital site is just a plain stupid idea. I get that options are limited, but that is no excuse for doing something stupid.

Tent yes, garden no more. Although there is a lot of green space on the estate, but it would feel a bit weird being surrounded on three sides by flats.

I did see someone suggest dentures like Nobby Styles had. Take them out during matches, then all opposition players need worry about is a load of sloppy gob on their arm.

I do wonder whether they're looking for better footage, because none that I have seen would be conclusive. Don't get me wrong, we all know what happened, but if he says "proove it" then they need a shot from the opposite side of all the ones I've seen, showing him actually getting his teeth stuck in. I suspect you're right that he'll say he can't possibly carry on in England now, and I hope Liverpool get a bloody good fee for him! ... ... ... and don't use it like Spurs used their Bale money!

Haha, we taled about just doing one night at the Crystal Palace campsite just for the kids to experience it, but I am a bit scared.

Obviously a bit old for me, but A few years younger and why not. I like a redhead.

Have you downloaded anything reasonably big? I guess that's where the difference would be if there is any at all. Different thing I know, but when I had superfast broadband I noticed little or no difference with general Internet use, but downloading was way way faster. Don't really download anything on my phone though so won't bother.

I said "Just that it's less surprising (if still very shocking) in that arena than on a football pitch." You said " In fact I'd say it is even more shocking on a football pitch than inside a ring where two people exchange blows for sport." Which is basically the same point. But yes, more than happy to change the subject. We'll know by tomorrow what the outcome is anyway...