Undisputedtruth

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/moneybox/7792850.stm The BBC article shows how financial institutions do not handle bereavement matters efficiently.

No, I shortened my sentence to signify a brothel used by Wayne Rooney. However, I did thought someone of a small minded nature may find the sentence as an issue. In this regard, you don't disappoint Otta!

Tanday Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Would Moyes be able to deliver attacking football > at Spurs though? He tends to set up his sides to > stifle the opposition. That said, he doesnt have > the same calibre of players to work with at > Everton. Great sides, these days, are able to stifle the opposition as well as producing fluid attacking football. The problem with Moyes is that he hasn't got hardly any strikers. His latest forward acquisition from Rangers looks like a decent player though. I think Moyes got the FA cup semi-final tactically right since Liverpool's srike force couldn't really score in a Wayne Rooney brothel. However, the mistakes by Everton gave the Livepool strkers the confidence to score goals that won the game.

Should be a good weekend of cup football. Both games will be tight.

Ladygooner Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Meanwhile - back to the football again! Does > anyone think Man City still have a chance of the > Premiership? Yep, as long as City can win all of their three remaining away games, it's possible. They have a fabulous home record so they should beat Utd. Utd are playing three teams, that have beaten City, in their remaining five games. I'd expect Utd to beat McLeish's Aston Villa but struggle in their following four games. Plus Utd will come under greater scrutiny due to recent questionable refereeing decisions. Plenty of twists and turns until the end of season.

The race for the premiership is getting interesting again. The question is whether City can sort out their away form as Utd is bound to drop more points.

Ladygooner Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Meanwhile - back to the football. Blackburn v > Liverpool very entertaining match - it will be > interesting to see the 3rd place goalie in action > again at Wembley on Sat. Must give Everton a lot > of hope! Everton are on form and they played a weaken team when they played Liverpool last. I sincerely hope Everton don't take the game for granted. If they can keep Gerrard quiet then they should go through.

Alan Medic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > How can a comment about not liking the insulting > of footballers for the sake of it turn into a > thread about ball and belly size? Silly indeed. > > PS I'm a Doctor too you know, UDT. It's been > documented. I don't too small minded thinking. Whether you consider yourself a doctor or not is irrelevant. You either have a fat belly or not. I was trying to be fair to PD & RD and I suspect this point may have got lost.

Parkdrive Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Yet another silly personal remark, suggesting we > are overweight when he's never met me. Absolutely. However, it's been documented elsewhere that Alan Medic was overweight but to suggest PD is overweight without meeting him is just silly.

No Otta, I'm not at all obsessive about Liverpool. They are not worth my time. It's your siege mentality, typical to many Liverpool fans, that makes you think that non-Liverpool fans somehow are obsessive about Liverpool. I'd say get over it. I merely using Liverpool strikers as a camparison to Balotelli's record. I can't think of many clubs who have wasted spent ?70m on forwards with a total return of just 11 goals. I never said anyone had questioned Balotelli's skills. You did. All what I'm saying is that Balotelli is going to get better in terms of physique, technique and maturity. Can't say the same with Carroll as he's older than Balotelli.

Arsenal deserved the win yesterday. Even if Balotelli stayed on, city were unlikely to get a result. Also Balotelli has scored more goals than Carroll & Suarez combined together in the premiership. Remember, Balotelli is only 21 and as yet to hit his peak. For the record, I don't put SJ in the don't know any better camp. I also agree with RD's assessment of Mancini's man management skills. You rarely see SAF criticising his players in public.

The media is having a field of a day by having a go at Balotelli. Sadly, the don't know any betters are lapping it up like there is no tomorrow. There is no evidence whatsoever Balotelli is bad for team morale. Look at Man City home record, it's near immaculate with only a draw as a blemish. Next see Balotelli's strike rate, impressive hey? Would Sir Alex Ferguson put up with Balotelli? Well he did with Rooney. Beckham and Rooney were liabilities to England buy they were still picked.

Balotelli is an Angel compared to Suarez! Balotelli is still a young player who will mature like Rooney did. ETA: BlueRevolution - can you thinkof a reason to why City perform badly in away games?

Alan Medic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I think City's downfall was > Mancini's faith in Balotelli who is obviously not > used to the concept of a team game. Balotelli is hardly the main reason for City's downfall. Mathematically, Balotelli may have cost his team five points with his two red cards. But they are currently eight points behind. The real downfall for City is their away form consisting of five defeats. Therefore the team must take responsibility as a whole. Fantastic home record though. Balotelli was unlucky to be sent off in his first red card this season, so hopefully Mancini will detract his knee jerk comment.

I hear you guys. I do agree Bayern Munich is a good side, but let's face it they haven't played a top quality side in the champions league yet, have they? So form means nothing. With Real on top of La Liga then I can't see BM beating them. Real have far too much firepower. Amazingly Real have scored 100 goals in thirty La Liga games while Barcelona have scored 86. Real ftw. ETA: apostrophe

Chelsea is going to get slaughtered in the semi finals. The question for me not is not whether Barcelona will reach the final but how much they put pass Chelsea. I think Barcelona Chelsea v Real Madrid makes a great final.

Huguenot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I think if you could spend a few more valuable > moments telling us how clever and superior you are > UDT, that would really help Alan Medic in his > task? > > (tu) It seems my last post on this thread may have confused your tiny mind. I was talking about building a PC that is superior to a mac at a given price point. These days there are very little differences in the operating system performance belonging to either an Apple or a PC. Apple do not manufacture their computing components like hard drives, memory and processors. So the system builder rides above the Apple v PC argument and is able to select superior performing components. I'm afraid branding and pricing are for those who don't know any better as they cannot work out/research what is good or bad.

I suspect Razor is in the 'wham bam thank you ma'am' type discussions.

I've bought the William Rose chorizo sausages last year and they were sold as uncooked. It would certainly be poor hygiene, through cross contamination, if cooked sausages were displayed next to raw sausages. I believe Marmora Man is referring to cured chorizo where you can either eat it from cold or cooked. The William Rose's chorizo sausages are not the same as cured chorizos.

There you go AC, here's his website http://www.puremacintosh.com/charges.html The real beauty about building your own system is that you can select your components in terms of quality, performance, aesthetics and energy efficiency. So you can build a superior PC to an Apple at a given price point. With the right components you can run Lion, Linux and windows concurrently thus making the Apple v PC argument irrelevant for the system builder. There are a number of limitations in the Apple machines. Firtly, if you have an i5-2500k processor, Apple will not allow you to overclock it on their system. Secondly, they have no USB 3.0s and thirdly, they only give you a one year warranty. ETA: go in first sentence.

Yes it does need cooking. Tasty too.

No Loz, Unite did not tell the public to fill up their jerrycans, Maude did. However, I do agree with you that anyone who follows the Tory government advice is an idiot!

Huguenot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Strikes that deliberately target the nation and > are likely to result in panic buying and accidents > like the one that resulted in a middle ageed woman > getting 40% burns should be particularly > concerning. > > It was not Maude's fault that accident happened - Yes it was Maude's fault. His union obsession is affecting his ability to come to a rational judgment and thereby putting countless people at risk of being burnt because of his poorly thought out advice.

Annette Curtain Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > My other half got a Mac Book Pro ( and it's > brilliant) from Chris "The Mac Man" > > He lives in ED and is very nice too > > He also delivers/fixes/installs blah blah....bla > > 07956288958 > > > NETTE(tu) He charges ?90 per hour to fix issues. La di da...di da.

Jeremy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Are you at all technical, Alan? You could try > building your own, there are plenty of guides > online for building a "hackintosh". Good advice wasted on this thread. Though I can't help feeling that Dr Medic will use his overpriced second hand Apple Mac just for the EDF.