Alan Medic

Jah Lush Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The short-lived song game thread. > > As if there aren't enough stupid lame brained > threads of similar ilk (including this one) for > the brain dead of this forum. Hey. I started that thread and if I'm brain dead, well that's my right. Over to you to start an intellectually stimulating thread.........

Saying you can't afford something is not the same as complaining.

Congratulations to Mrs adonirum. A loophole in the laws of the game allows this entry so she is the winner. End of thread......

August anyone?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QuJSyuOKMMA Wiz

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QuJSyuOKMMA June Hymn - This is now blatant cheating but what the heck I quite like this

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYxsucvJPRM Arcade Fire - Month of May

I think that about our home. I've had to introduce a rule that anything you take in anymore, we get rid of something equal in size.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzRrGNygjzs July Morning - Uriah Heep May,June, August left

Well it might not be a song though.

That will do, bar objections. 5 months left bar other objections.

Feck the rules. Only months left. Feb, March,May,June,July & August.

Anyway those entries without a u tube clip are disqualified..........so there.

red devil Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Meds, to make it a little more difficult > (eventually) how about a rule that people have to > post in a fixed order ie Monday, Tuesday etc..then > January, February etc... No, no, no....it's meant to be easy and if a day/month has gone, its gone.Have they all gone already? I hate those other bloody games that go on forever.

You were only meant to do one Loz.........

Somehow at this time of the year I always think of this song. It's called October Song. Can you post a song which includes in its title a day or a month preferably with a u tube clip? There are only 19 to choose from. I could do some more but thought I'd make it a little game which won't go on for ever and ever.

Otta Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Think I've done this thread before sometime long > ago, but here we are again. > > I'm off the booze for October for this MacMillan > fund raising (up to ?225, feel free to chip in). > Do you have a link?

We had them a while back. They like red wine.

rahrahrah Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I was genuinely taken aback that anyone would wish > to have such an obnoxious number plate (you may > expect it of Jeremy Clarkson I guess). Speaking of him, this amused me particularly as the BEEB denied it was deliberate. Really? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-29474422

A past particle is a particle that's gone, in any language.

I can't go there again RD.........

I'm not sure I understand the concept of making a sacrifice for charity........but that's me. Anyway, my Mrs has been brewing this drink at home: http://www.thekitchn.com/how-to-make-kombucha-tea-at-home-cooking-lessons-from-the-kitchn-173858 So far two bottles have exploded while fermenting or whatever it's doing. It's supposed to be healthy and might be fun to try making it to keep yourself occupied.

edcam Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Then really it would have been best to send a > private message instead of implicating a company > in public that might be entirely innocent. > > el_fed Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Hi Edcam, > > > > I'm sorry but I only said could it be. I > haven't > > said they were involved. I offered an option of > a > > company car that fitted the description given. > > > > I'm not in anyway suggesting it is them and I > will > > keep my post as is unless the admin advises me > > otherwise. > > > > The OP can advise if the logo matches the car > from > > the altercation. > > > > El. How is mentioning a company whose logo may or may not have been on the car implicating the company? The only one here who appears to be guilty of anything is the driver. If he does work for that company they may well be interested in his behaviour while using a company car.

Go on, just describe what you think posters look like and let them give you a mark out of 10 for accuracy.

You know there's a thread on this subject already?