It's amazing how some of them get up so quickly when they are ignored by the ref. I think for the most part that has been a good feature of the WC (the ref's I mean).
StraferJack Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Do people only have one belt? I now have two in working order. Never counted my ties but I probably have some which will return to being fashionable one day.
31 fouls yesterday by Brazil. They are no advert for the beautiful game and nothing compared to some Brazilian teams of the past. I think its been sheer willpower that has got them this far. I'm hoping some team will prove to be worthy winners because as yet no one really has shown enough to merit that. Perhaps if Argentina realise they are more than a 1 man team they might. I hope so solely on the grounds it's worth ?100 to me as I picked them out of the hat at work.
Did anyone say they shouldn't be challenged? If saw I someone looking in my bin I'd ask them what they hoped to find there. As for them spreading the word, I'd imagine there are easier ways of getting that information than going through the contents of a bin.
I've been impressed with most of what I've seen from the ref's. They don't seem to be buying the falling down I've just been shot type of routine some players act out. Why do you ask MM?
I don't want to get all preachy but this film shows how lucky some of us are. Yes, it's on this planet. The one we live on. If people are worried about ID theft then why put something in your bin which might be stolen? Has it not occured to you that just because the bin is emptied does not mean your 'rubbish' is safe?
If people are concerned about other people rummaging in their bins, what do they feel after they have been collected and emptied? What sort of world is it where some people need to rummage in bins and others get upset about it? You're only passing through this planet and some people have to do not very nice things to help them survive.
Where I came from the usual term for travelling people was tinkers. However, in retrospect, given our inability to pronounce th, in could have meant they were philosophers of a sort.
I'm surprised you are brave enough to buy any clothes for your wife J for various reasons: You'll probably get something she doesn't like. It might not fit her. Mostly, you have in an instant deprived her of going shopping for something.