Alan Medic

FIFA make 4 months seem like a long ban but in reality it's the feckin Summer. Take two months or so off that when he would be having a break anyway.

StraferJack Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Talk of "affording" ethics misses the point of > what ethics is > > It isn't a product you buy off a shelf Oh yes it is. > > It's doing the right thing even at personal cost > (monetary or otherwise) And if you can't afford it? > > You paying someone in "cash" is up to you. Onus is > on the recipient to do right thing. Crap. The recipient usually suggests it to keep the price down. > > It's the old " would you pick up a suitcase with a > million quid in it of you knew doing so would kill > x number of people" chestnut isn't it No. Nothing like it.

Actually Liverpool may have benefitted from his ban. He is less of an attractive option to those with the money to buy him. He isn?t available to play until October. Thus he is likely to stay at Liverpool and not have to make all those long journeys to South America for international matches. Elbowing is potentially dangerous, biting probably not so, more of a shock. He has a problem but so do most of us in one way or another.

Why don't they just make him wear a gumshield?

As a matter of interest how many people have paid someone 'cash' to avoid VAT? I have. It's great being ethical if you can afford it.

I agree that it should just be an international ban as that would be consistant with what happens normally. It's a shame that the likely scenario is that Suarez will miss the rest of the WC as he is a class player. What he did was just plain weird and suggests he needs help but it didn't annoy me personally as much as players play acting that they are injured. However you classify what Suarez did, it could hardly be called cheating.

If Suarez did bite again he should be banned for a long time.

It's a new concept to me. Women being seen as objects as opposed to wives, girlfriends, daughters, mothers or friends. What are they then?

LadyDeliah Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The high shoes thing is supposed to be something > to do with making our bum look higher and perkier, > which apparently triggers the primal sex centre in > most guys' brains. > > So yeh, guys, it's totally your fault! I think you're getting confused with a bra. High heels just look silly.

srisky Wrote: However, > such terms, including 'yummy mummy' are part of > the objectification of women (not necessarily > sexual) in society. What do you mean?

I wonder what the user called Yummy Mummy will think if she ever reads this thread?

What are yuppie types? I presume anyone who bothered to go there has an appreciation of remoteness at the very least.

Bowling for > ?100. Who does that?

There's one in Lewisham. http://www.mfabowl.com/lewisham/contact-us Seems the 185 bus gets you there.

2nd time on this thread.

http://www.kilda.org.uk/visiting.htm#.U6WNDJRdWSo This type of sketchy?

I love the dawn chorus too and hate this day where from now on in daylight hours get smaller. However what happens here is nothing compared to the sounds I have heard from birds early morning while camping in Queensland. What amazing sounds.

Parkdrive Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Lineker wearing an Italy shirt last night was > cringe worthy. Not sure what was going through his > mind but it's wrong on every level. Was it not just blue or was there a badge on it too? I wasn't paying attention. If there was it's a shame as however much you might like a particular result to happen, it's disrespectful to Costa Rica and not in line with how I view the BEEB as being fairminded.

Louisa Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Don't forget if they're field mice they're > protected and you can't touch them. > > Louisa. So if you put down a trap do you put a sign up as well 'not for field mice'? You could argue if it's not in a field, it's not a field mouse I suppose. You must have signed a contract of some sort Anna. If there's nothing in the small print I would say it's the landlord's responsibility. Given that mice can't fly as far as I'm aware then they are coming up from the ground somewhere.

Well Roy now has a chance to put out a new team from the start in the final game.

So two teams have 6 points and England 3. Not sorted for England.

Louisa Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Italy looking tired and predictable. These South > American teams appear a class above even Europe's > finest in this World Cup. > > Louisa. Italy are not Europe's finest.

Otta Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Haha, my poor neighbour. I saw his flags this > morning looking limp and pathetic as a drunk's > cock. You've seen one of these?

???? Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Are you willing to bet Mr M? Not at this precise moment.

MrBen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The problem is the Italians in their last game. > Their style in that scenario is to field their B > team and generally they won't be arsed. That might depend on them caring if they win the group or not and who they might prefer to play.