Alan Medic

Seems the UK managed to f**k up potential trade deals with both China and Japan due to sheer stupidity. Meanwhile the media manages to focus on a teenage girl in a foreign country who is apparently a threat to the nation. To keep the story going, let's strip her of her citizenship. That will keep the great unwashed busy for a while.

The impact of social media on the EU referendum. http://www.referendumanalysis.eu/eu-referendum-analysis-2016/section-7-social-media/impact-of-social-media-on-the-outcome-of-the-eu-referendum/ This doesn't mention why the leave campaign had more influence, just that it did. How it did is another story. If you are so inclined this is worth watch...? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6gf5whRuQ0

JohnL Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > uncleglen Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > On 23rd June 2016 the PEOPLE had the final > > say...stop reading the so-called > > 'Independent'.....the trouble is with > remainiacs > > is they thought they had it in the bag because > > they ALL live in areas where NO-ONE was > suffering- > > (instead quite the opposite)- because of the EU > > single market rules.... > > I really really really don't want to quote Norman > Tebbit at you Uncle .. but it's so tempting. Does it involve cycling?

I had an appointment this week which I had obtained online about a month ago. It was the only one there. When speaking with the Doc about a future appointment and telling her there's often nothing or very little available online, she said they have a new system in place (another one?). According to her the online booking are put on each day at 10am. I'd be interested to hear if anyone tries this and what the outcome was. I also asked her how do I obtain the result of a blood test I was going to have, as I don't seem to be able to access my medical records via 'patient access'. She told me to let reception know I want this facility. The receptionist said that wasn't possible, that I had to complete a form and subsequently use a different site to access this info. Can't remember the name, something like 'my doc' possibly.

KidKruger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Alan I mean in the sense I was taught, an awake > entity which created everything and has power over > all, who?s gates we must pass to enter ?his? realm > - or be confined to ?hell? ! > Forgive me if that?s not what?s actually being > repeated in churches up and down. KK, you forgot to mention the beard! I ask only because I wondered what people think god is. Your description is probably pretty normal and in that sense, I'd agree with you, he doesn't exist. I would however, though not call it god, suggest that there is a higher consciousness than what humans normally tap into.

KidKruger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > God doesn?t exist. > You can believe in what you want but posting > medieval clap trap isn?t the basis for debate > surely. How do you define God? Just curious.

Administrator Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Unacceptable but worth debating? I'd love to if I had the time. Don't think it should be deleted.

Hosea 4:6) My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge. I like this bit. To answer your question, no and no.

Just curious, but would he have been able to know if it was a particularly valuable phone or not?

Anyone follow @J_amesp on Twitter? His take is quite scary.

The printer I use at work counts the pages printed and based on that tells you, you are low on ink. Reset the counter for the different colours and bingo, no more low on ink messages. Plenty of You Tube videos on the subject as to how to do it. You won't find it in an instruction manual I'd guess.

No deal here we come! I think that may be the plan. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/feb/13/kicking-up-dust-little-sign-of-progress-in-uk-eu-talks?CMP=twt_gu

tarafitness Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Oh my goodness. To call the lollipop man > ineffective would be doing him a massive kindness. > It really winds me up. He stands leaning against > the island on Crystal Palace Road - which is the > safest part of that junction, and therefore the > least necessary spot. He doesn't even step into > the road when people cross at that point, he just > holds the lollipop stick out *behind* them as they > cross over. I don't understand why he's there in > the first place, he might as well not be, he > provides no barrier between pedestrians and the > traffic. It's really baffling! I'd argue that it isn't the safest place to cross and that the island is a contributing factor in making it more dangerous than elsewhere. If you see reaching the island as a sort of safe haven to reach while crossing, you tend to only look in the direction you would expect a vehicle to come from. Because of the island and the fact that parking is legal quite close to it, it often makes it difficult for larger vehicles to get by. Due to this, sometimes they will pass the island on the wrong side on the road rather than go slowly. A while back I was a microsecond away from being flattened by a van which accelerated to do this. So in my opinion far from being safe, its position with parking in close proximity, make it a potential death trap as I almost found out.

lidsey Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Alan Medic Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > HelBel65 Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > Terrible news. > > > > > > I was a bit taken aback to hear Andrew Castle > > on > > > LBC this morning referring to ED as ?a rough > > area? > > > where you ?really have to watch yourself? > Maybe > > > he?s right after this. > > > > I listen to Andrew Castle fairly often and he > is > > particularly uninformed for a broadcaster. > > How dare you discuss on this post about whats the > best part of East Dulwich to live in No > consideration for the poor family and friends of > this local man . What exactly has upset you by the above?

Round two is over and only two have 100% records. Round Two Leaderboard

diable rouge Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > They've read the Brexit thread, no deal > prepping... I literally thought this.

Half of them had those transparent shields. Weird.

I think I just saw about 20 police in riot gear marching at speed past the Great Exhibition pub. Was I hallucinating?

HelBel65 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Terrible news. > > I was a bit taken aback to hear Andrew Castle on > LBC this morning referring to ED as ?a rough area? > where you ?really have to watch yourself? Maybe > he?s right after this. I listen to Andrew Castle fairly often and he is particularly uninformed for a broadcaster.

My EU passport holding brother and his English partner retired to Spain last Summer. Haven't communicated much with them since but appears she has the right to stay now. Don't know the specifics.

In case reminders are needed Mick Mac and DR, you have yet to make your predictions.

JohnL Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Wales making a lot of changes against Italy. > > Gatland likes to think there are about 30 players > who can slot in to the first team without > lessening it. I doubt that's the case but in a WC year experience will count for a lot. Also with rugby being so attritional there's always going to be injuries.

Ah, SJ or even JS. I've not been on here too much lately. I blame Brexit and Twitter.

Round 2 coming up... Saturday 14.15 Scotland v Ireland 16.45 Italy v Wales Sunday 15.00 England v France

Thank you for all of the suggestions.