snorky

what about L/G/TG only swimming sessions at the ED pool? etc Seeing as the last swimming pool restricted access thread got such a good response, lets adapt this one in a similar fashion

its bovine this applies to both sexes

Do they owe us a living? Of course they do, of course they do

Ive been looking at Mk3 Cortinas on Ebay recently.. how sad is that

cars no longer rust after the first few months and car tool kits dont have cold chisels in them any longer.... cars use more energy in their construction that they can use ( and therefor "save" ) during their lifetime - often, the greener the cars, the more wasteful they can be, should you build in the construction energy expense cars now have the capability to last a lifetime ( dont laugh ) - so reusing and repairing cars is probabaly better for the planet at this lates pre collapse stage anyway But thats a very utilitarian viewpopint and we know that the majority of new car buying isnt becasue their old one is shagged or the head gasket has gone, but its a vanity decision - new car=visible bauble of success amongst peers etc and its fashion as well - the so called Chelsea tractors are more frequesntly bought by the proles than the toffs these days ( see also Golf GTI )

Cassius Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I don't have a car at all but if the person who > owns the DB7 parked on Melbourne Grove would like > to take me for a spin..... What, the one with the illegal number plates ? Its just a mondeo with a few badges on it - and a big slab of ego trip I cannot see the sense in buying a new car - company car owners aside - what benefit is there in paying a premium to buy it new as opposed to getting one 3 months old with 1000 miles on the clock for 20% less ? Its utterly insane & I see otherwise level headed people doing it all the time - it is worth several thousand / tens of thousand of quid ( in some cases ) just to get that brief shopping buzz ? Some would say its barking wasteful selfish etc etc etc

blurgh unispired Italian food I wont be trekking to the green for that.no thanks

This isnt a Snorky post Im glad to say. Alicia - Im guessing this is more than just a helpful posting on your behalf & I am equally sure that you are more than familiar with this forum , although obviously not under the name Alicia - but dont you have better things to do - like the Daily mail Xword or pasting up that barking mad pro manarchist shite on random walls & disused shop fronts ? what a horrible , nasty and underhand post. Good riddance Alicia - piss off to Sevenoaks or whatever sterile turdhole you are buying in - would you have stayed if ED erected a wall around its borders to keep the scum out ? Poor quality troll. 1/10

bawdy-nan Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I just noticed this post on the facebook group > from an independent evaluator of the Livesey > > "I had..the great pleasure and privilege of > evaluating the Livesey's.. 'Myths and Legends' in > 2006. The report..contributed to...'Telling tales- > a guide to developing effective storytelling > programmes for museums', thus proving that the > Museum is at the forefront of its field...The > Livesey attracts families and school visitors of > diverse backgrounds and the Museum serves as a > positive and vibrant, and very important meeting > point... Building on the UN convention of the > rights of the child, Children's museums are > pioneers and essential in the field of... > developing innovative and creative informal > learning spaces...There are too few Children's > museums in the UK, and by closing the Livesey..., > this list will be even shorter... many young > Londoners will be denied the opportunity to, in a > dedicated and unique space with expert > facilitators, develop their curiosity, > imagination, teamwork and language skills." Emily > Johnsson Emily...Hmmmmm...the pieces of the jigsaw are beginning to fit together

my employers are rapacious scum, but have macde a few token./ well opublicised office moves to embrace the planet sadly, their multi faced business interested include strip mining & soya planatations in newly cleared Brazilian rainforest so a bit rubbish really

Its too street for snorky - hard core bludz all wanting to pop a cap in snorkys sorry ass etc acutlly, its a decent area. Dont be oput off by the postcode, its closers to the "vibrant" etc etc et Lordship lane than much of "East Dulwich" anyway the same solid victorian house as you get in SE22 propa, but significantly cheaper - and not as many annoying clapham expat women and their twattish husbands either go for it. ( get a " short" or a "piece" before you move in tho' )

haha what the membership of the RP these days ?

Moos Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > OK, this is a little off topic, sorry - but a > point for debate: > > Do we all drift to the right (regardless of where > we started out) as we get older? I don't mean in > a party political, but in the sense of becoming > more generally conservative? IM not as textbook left, but have thought things through more to arrive at conclusions when yer young, its much easier to come out with whatever guff you have been given to read or your peers are quoting - thats why you dont see any swappies ( SWP ) sellers older than about 26 ( there are exceptions tho', as i see down at ED station soem mornings and often make a disparaging comment to )

Im not mysogonist- I despise everyone >:D< Its just on the balance of probabailities, its a litle hobbyette, a bit of late teen angsty chest beating and an excuse to smoke roll ups and pontificate to those that have sold out to "the man" - It is all probably jolly good fun tho' and I dont doubt her sincerity at the minute. I remember how niave I was at her age - it makes me shudder thinking about it.

Under your basic human rights, you dont have to admit anythying to anyone or supply this tyope of information - refuse to accept you were in the car / admit you were driving ( even if you were, you are under no obligation to confirm it to them ) and let them do the running - they cant chase you for a debt unless it gone to court and been found in their favour - and I have yet to hear of one that has gone to court Sadly, so many people pay the "fines" that its lucrative enough without the hassle of actually going thro' the legal hoops for the odd obstinate non payer like me. it doesnt excuse using disabled spaces though - private car park or not

Did I say that ? The people who commit the crime are still criminals, but its a monster than few of us can claim to have no hand in its creation, espcially those based in the industries that feed and nuture this consumption monster

mark my words- the actions of precocious white middle class anarkokidz will be the spark that ignites the flames of revolution in this country - until they finish University and get a job that is. its easy to be a radical with crusty Chic clothing and Dreads-lite and you have ther time & support to play the revolutionary for a couple of years A Bit harder to live this life when you are on the bottom and struggle to keep your heads above water

No, cos I dont believe in teh baby jebus

cynical ploy by vampire-ish card manufactures and flower sellers to increase profits by instilling guilt. see also valentines day.

kids now want portable comsumer goods to make them look cool, they will mug other kids to get these and adults too. they know that ?300 quid phone you are loudly talking into will get them a month or two extra respeckt amongest their peers - the fac that they have fallen for this hype by the advertisers and marketers is closely related - kids are a huge market for the manufacturers of such tat as we all know ED is awash with people employed in marketing / advertising / creatives... blah blah blah are these kidz the frankenstiens monsters of these industries ? reap / sow scenario ? Hmmmmmmm

I sometimes see some one dimensional fellow on a ugly fat black harleyD copy ( complete with sad leather satchel on the rack ) pootling through the junction the wrong way and causng problems with cars trying to turn into Copleston - would a bike lane envourage people like this ?

macroban Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Comrade snorky has previously rehearsed the legal > status of "fines" and private parking areas. > > Perhaps snorky could now explain the legal status > of differential contract pricing of (say) charging > ?50 to park in a disabled parking space in a > private car park without a valid diasbled badege. Its not about fines, its about decency and consideration for others

not exactlly I had this with Lidl and got to the bottom of it - its not an offence and they cant "fine" you , even if it appears to look like a fine - its a private matter involving acceptance of implied contract they could theoretically take to to county court for breaking a contract with them, but punitive penlties are not allowed under civil law- just compensation for loss incurred - and seeing as its a non pay car park, they cant lose anything - they have nevet actually gone to court as far as I know. anyway, they cant "fine" the legal owner/ registered keeper of the car or take out a summons on the car itself - a car cant make a decision as to where it drives , they have to make a summons on the driver that day and they need to be able to prove on the balance of probability that you implicitly accepted the terms of the contract when you were parking etc - they alos have to be able to prove that the person summonsed to CC was indeed the driver basically, its a load of ole toss, but if it keeps scum from abusing reserved parking bays, then Im not bothered ( not you of course ! )

Moos Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hmm, I'm wondering whether I too live on the same > road as Jackangel and PGC! Howdy, neighbours. > > Anyway, the parking spaces at Sainsbury's are > definitely monitored - we were once fined for > parking in one of the parent-and-child spaces, > because we had taken the Moosling into the shop in > his car seat, so we looked as though we weren't > bona fide tot-toters. The fine was removed when > we produced the baby as evidence, but if they can > police the parent spaces, they can surely check > disabled spaces. They cant fine you anyway

Emily Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > This sort of scheme is the fastest way to destroy > local shops. Good work, make Lordship Lane a > desirable place to visit, then make it a near > impossible place to visit. Brilliant. > Why not just put up a sign, saying, 'don't bother. > go to Sainsbury's'? hahaha post of the day