????

There are plenty of cobblers on the forum - i point you towards the Attacks in France thread for a starters

she reads the Forum and steals all my best lines

I read that today and nearly posted a link :)

There's an old american journalistic cliche 1 in Wisconsin = 10 in Wales = 100 in Wakhatu

It was in French too :)

Your grandad was Volitaire RPC?

Los - he,s a 'thick' white working class bloke...not an Assange or a Polanski I,m also surprised that, whilst not a rapist, Brand is such a Nero of the Guardian et al given his general mysogony...but hey, he sticks it to the man eh

Drop the terrorist Left wingers=arsie bourgeois full stop :)

I would have stone cold bet on Woolwich even just 5 years ago but I've hear that's turning too

I,m talking about numerous tedious articles every November (mainly in 'you know where') and some posters on here. I agreed with Maxis post the 'forced wearing, is ridiculous but I,ll go on wearing one every year and not as any kind of statement. You don,t have to wear one and I can understand why you don't want. I don.t judge anyone who chooses not to but the miss representation of what wearing one means is tedious....

Unbelievable. just heard it - Do these people have brains he's meant to be a media trained spokesman, did he think what he said wouldn't,t be disastrous!

I've managed to stop the sauce in the week for some time now and have been a moderate drinker (by previous standards)for a few years now. To the extent that on the rare occasions I do go out on sessions I feel very lightweight and am noticeably more pissed than those who are used to it as I go back to old drinking volume with no ability to drink like that anymore, - related it was scary how quickly my tolerance ramped up just with 2 weeks of daily boozing over Christmas.

Maxxii sums it up pretty spot on for me. PLUS I get a bit bored of the "look at me, I don't wear a poppy" stance some take as, in reality, they are in the majority, certainly in London anyway, so and the contrived politics around "warmongering politicians etc" misses the point entirely

Back on the 5/2... A personal best steveo?

Polanski still gets to make critically acclaimed films tho

Selfie Sticks already. Fooking everywhere.

Anyway, I look forward to the certain and moral consensus displayed on this thread applied to Polanski and Assagne... (...not holding my breath remembering previous threads on them)

No. Buy a jury has heard the evidence and found him guilty.

Price controls ( especially ones miles away from reality) = unintended consequences, lack of investment in the asset and/or taxpayer subsidies etc etc *take note Labour Party energy 'policy' cheap fuel for everyone, huzzah

The problem is that he fundamentally doesn't,t believe he's guilty. He's wrong absolutely but by his warped sense of morality he thinks he's her victim. So we won't get contrition, acknowledgement, remorse or even him asking people not to stop harassing her. For this reason, wot *bob* said

There was meant to be a smiley after that!

Yup, agree. Showing the worse face of the forum....thanks Otta

So, Mobility crushed in an instant? Build more houses not rent control is the solution as any fool know

Yes, brilliant. I will sign it, sell my place in SE22 and claim my ?195 four bedder in Belgravia, toute suite

hibbs Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You would fit right in then Quids ;-) Anyways you > are all talk, for the 8 years you have been > threatening to come along. > > I'm hoping to be there MP. > > x Nearly as long as I've been threatening to come along to your 21st Birthday Parties :)