????

Fad not a trend

Ok, Crystal Clear is wrong the verses are open to interpretation but that interpretation has become dogma . The pragmatic, if drastic, short-cut to purity is an outright ban on all such depictions. The Hadith have, in effect, almost as much doctrinal authority as do verses of the Koran, so the implicit edict against depictions of the Prophet Muhammad is, in Islamic dogma, final Wikki somewhere The bottom line is that such a widespread publishing would insult millions of muslims - the terrorists would be very happy with that.

The bible doesn't say "Celluoid piss taking of our religous believes are blashesmous" The Koran is crystal clear on creating an image of the prophet etc There is a 'fundamental'(for want of a better word) difference. All tosh.... but these are hugely different examples

The "consequences" are a blasphemous and deep insult against all practising muslims. Foook the terrorists.

david_carnell Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Dear god?! Seriously? You don't get that > response? > > It says, proudly, we will not be cowed. We will > not be initimated by your acts of violence. We > will defeat you not by a machine gun but by > freedom of speech. There are many of us. You are > few. That you do not represent Islam and take your > prophets name in vain when committing these acts. > > If we stop publishing these things, because of > "offence", because of consequences like this, > terrorism wins. And we all lose. It insults all Islam, even the peaceful bits - the potrayal of the prophet/god in any human form, so it's a gross insult to all muslims. Now, it's all a load of medieval tosh IMO but that's the issue with all papers doing it

Anyway, this is a PROPa clique thread

great news tho, Song has retired from international football

Valencia losing confidence too.

Was that before or after the great Stalinist purge? My memory Isn,t what it was since Siberia

Louisa Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > RPC you don't need to be a new poster to feel the > wrath of the lounge clique. I'm regarded as some > sort of court jester brought out to entertain the > EDF elite when needed, easily brushed aside as a > troll when I go against the clique By talking > about things they don't like. Especially if > exposing the negative activities of the gentrified > ED population. > > Louisa. Power to the people Wolfie (1970's TV joke not EDF Cliquey joke)

So ironically you preferred the cliquey EDF drinks of 2008 organised in the lounge to the latter version which I think are part of the WOIED thread and not attended by many lounge posters who would be considered clique :)

What is this Facebook ye talk of?

Michael Palaeologus Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > We would initiate you in the usual manner. I've heard tales of magic, deliberate vandalism of chairs and people forgetting where they live afterwards. Sounds like a combination of the Bullingdon and the Magic Circle to me

Ooh don't talk of such things so near to bedtime

I,d love to come Michael but you seem a bit cliquey to me

Louisa Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I love talking about things we've all gone over > numerous times before. Sue where is your response? > A few of us are waiting. > > Louisa. Clique talk

Nice substitutions by the big fat one yet again, tosser

Fooking injury time goal.....grrrrr

Speak for yourself Mockney, I mean El Pibe, I mean me, I mean us

Oh please say it's so Louisa, Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeease

Hey. I'm in the Clique, Huzzah! Taken years.

Robert Poste's Child Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > ???? Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > light hearted post rather than heartfelt debate > in > > a largely ridiculous thread maybe RPC? > > Ah. And is the dismissive bit in that one also > light-hearted? it can be what you want it to be, I'm really not bothered at all in getting involved in a debate in the sort of pointless rubbish (including mine) that this type of thread results in. Tis' all pooterish and laughable in my opinion.

light hearted post rather than heartfelt debate in a largely ridiculous thread maybe RPC?

Clique bashings it's the new Yummy Mummy bashing doncha know

The 40 bus has been ruined by all these blow ins from train commuting