Jeremy

"Judgeing"??

SeanMacGabhann Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Not sure about this particular kid but the > parents of the last one had plenty to say > > Possibly self-serving but still... Yep, I know about that story. I can't really take what the father says at face value. Still, doesn't mean I agree with what Madonna is doing. Hopefully she will encourage them to keep in touch with their heritage, and give them every opportunity to return to Malawi after they've had an education.

So who caught Despatches? I'm not a huge fan of the guy, but this programme was unashamedly biased. Especially the stuff about getting the journalist beaten up, which never actually happened.

Does anyone know what surviving family this child has, or is it all speculation? It seems unlikely that it has no family willing to look after it, but you never know.

snorky Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Whats the difference between an MP pushing the > boundaries of her expenses & you taking your > partner out for a meal & passing it off as client > entertainment ? > > Answer: nothing. I see what you're saying. Except that MPs should know that the opposition and the media thrive on any tiny bit of dirt they can dig up. And my expenses don't come out of public funds. But yeah, all this fuss about a couple of PPV films is ridiculous, for such an insignificant amount.

Brendan Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I have been served bad pints before in local pubs > but the staff have always been happy to replace > them. Same here.

Man Of Constant Sorrow - Soggy Bottom Boys

Thanks, I forgot about that. Last of the Summer Wine Dinner Ladies My Hero Brush Strokes

Japanese food from Edo or Fujiyama: http://www.edolondon.co.uk/ http://www.newfujiyama.com/ Pizza from Firezza: http://www.firezza.com/

Birds of a Feather Father Ted My Family

Do you still have access to a fridge and a microwave? If not... wheat crunchies?

Recruitment agents often take clients to strip clubs. It happens in banking too (obviously). I've never done anything too outrageous (I never really have the scope to expense many things in my job) but have paid for meals for friends and family before. It's not much... but probably came to more than Jaqui's husband's porn.

Some of the bars along that stretch do get a bit lairy at times...

I agree that too many people use their cars in London. I am very surprised that over 50% of Southwark's car owners use their car for daily commuting. I support the congestion charge, but am frustrated at years of under investment in public transport. If you want to get specific to ED : there is arguably a bit of spare capacity in the local train network, but not much. And instead of having services increased, they are actually being reduced. Not much of an incentive to ditch the car, is it? Councils possibly could make a profit from parking fees (and fines) - but having some insight into the way local councils are ran, I seriously doubt they do!

Huguenot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Thatcher's dismissal was equally 'undemocratic'. Quite. The original "unelected successor" comment seemed a little strange to me, as it has happened several times, and it's not exclusive to either party. That's the system in this country isn't it... we elect the party, not the PM. That's how it works, it is not in any way illegitimate.

I would think everyone on here is pretty much aware of the environmental impact of motoring. That's not the point I'm making here though, I was only challenging your assumption that motorists are financially subsidised. In fact, the more I think about it, the more I think it's possible that it may be the other way round. Certainly when considered at a national level, rather than just the local council. I'm sure you will gleefully post the councillor's response - as if it somehow supports your conclusions - nonetheless! It also seems rather simplistic to suggest that motorists are selfishly killing the planet. Not everyone lives in an area with extensive public transport such as London or Singapore (even better). Plenty of people live in areas where there are few other ways of getting around - and these are the people who rack up serious miles in their cars. What's being to provide alternatives and incentives for these people?

Huguenot... we've had a similar discussion before. "Traffic Transport and Planning" covers more than just "services for motorists". Plus, add in the fact that everyone needs roads for buses, taxis, post. Shops and businesses need the roads. And motorists of course pay additional taxes in the form of road tax, fuel, and sometimes congestion charge. So your stats - while relevant - are nowhere near detailed enough to draw the conclusions you have come to.

Don't Go - Yazoo

I don't think anyone is suggesting that we don't need flats as well as houses, but we need to keep an eye on things to make sure we have the right mix. Dulwich - like any area in London - cannot support an unlimited population. It's not just parking and congestion, also the public transport is almost full to capacity, with limited scope for extra services.

My Vagina - NOFX

Little Bitch - The Specials

Love For Tender - Elvis Costello

What?s the matter with parents today - NOFX

Kids of the K Hole - NOFX

What Jeremy said