SteveT Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Muslim fundamentalism is not what I would choose > and many others would agree, but I am sure people > would vote for a "no theft policy" and if it was > achieved by lopping an arm off, it is very > efficient in that you would only have to chop one > off. It's a very cheap solution too, you would > not need nearly so many police, probation > officers, lawyers, judges, law-courts, prisons, > warders etc. > > It is because of all those listed that we will not > see it happen here. Sadly we will continue to > watch stolen bikes being sold down Brick lane, > burglars, bankers, and MP's being themselves and > nothing done about it. OK, I'll bite, and I'll skip over the bleedingly obvious fact that we used to have similar deterrants in this country for theft, which astonishingly didn't result in a no-theft society. In your fundamental world, what would then happen to the thief with one arm? How is he going to earn a living in the future? I imagine in Afghanistan, he is eligible to no state help or handouts, so becomes a beggar or continues to try to thieve, rather than starve.