KidKruger

"...levied on the purchase of ANY additional property over ?40,000" slim-pickings then.

And his surname rhymes with Twat.

Why not just PVA the timber / brick in-fill and have your own Tudor-esque 'feature' ? Surely would be a talking point for all visitors.

Was the crack visible through the plaster before you took the plaster off ? If not (and plaster was quite old) then it may be a historic crack. One thing I've surmised, these houses surely were thrown-up quick style.

when I find myself feeling some parent (through their passive-aggressive way of hastily rescuing their child from my vicinity) has 'concerns' about me, I think "feck you, I've nowt to be ashamed of" and start a conversation with their kid(s). Feck them, why should anyone feel that way !

Foxy the mummy probably just didn't want her kids to annoy you by getting in yer face.

Yeah when people fight back after their territory is occupied and their people abused they are called terrorists - usually by the countries / leaders responsible.

Given the performances of both boxers, Fury won, absolutely no doubt about that. But Vlad lost the fight more than Fury won it, IYKWIM. If there's a return, I think Vlad will throw more than a pathetic 19 punches a round and overall put on a better account of himself. Something to look forward to in 2016. Quillin v Jacobs is the fight next weekend. I wonder if the winner has the balls to fight (or even acknowledge the existence of) Golovkin.

Yes there's a clause, which Vlad has said he will exercise. I'd still rate Vlad to beat Fury, who I'm just not convinced by (yet).

Now that's a result I would never have bet on happening. Must have been a very off day for Vlad. So does Fury face Wilder now / soon ?

Sky burial please.

of course not. it's a load of bollox. why the news is wasting so much space on this shite is beyond me. so much to report on and this crap is featuring even on TV !

The 'screecharound' comment was just meant to be insulting, which was uncalled for.

When did a piss become a 'comfort break' for buggery's sake.

"Of course, ED would choose a day like today. Nice timing!" I don't think that 'ED' deliberated for a period of time before concluding "hey, let's use the day after the Paris killings especially to set-off our remaining fireworks". I suspect it was just business as usual for the kids who've got fireworks in their posession. most of the kids setting-off fireworks (just as kids do every year) are not really associating an atrocity in Paris or anywhere else with their own frolics. there is possibly an argument that they should do otherwise, but this would entail sitting all kids down every time there is an event for which you feel they should show 'respect' and therefore curtail their usual frolics accordingly. I guess then that you get into having to decide what degree of severity of 'event' necessitates which kind of 'curtailment' of their usual frolics. You would then have to enforce this consistently and of course review the method you're applying because, over time, people's perceptions of the seriousness / relevance of particular events may change. For example, would a year of weekly bombings in Paris mean all kids in ED should have curtailment of their usual activities every week also ? If you work into your method a holistic consideration (not just of Paris, but Beirut, Kenya, Turkey) and not just bombs (what about the 1.5 million killed by Malaria, for example) there may be little fun left to be had. What is your thinking on how this should be applied 'littlethistle', I think since your first post you've had time to consider what it ws you were really trying to say and whether now you would rephrase it ?

"Couldn't agree more! And calling someone a holocaust denier is grossly offensive IMO" I was going to stand Foxy up for this one but I know he couldn't possibly really mean it, regardless of whether he actually wrote it. So I'll take the insult on the chin, even though it was completely undeserved (ie. How can you deny the holocaust when you don't even realise he's talking about the nazis).

"Couldn't agree more! And calling someone a holocaust denier is grossly offensive IMO" I was going to stand Foxy up for this one but I know he couldn't possibly mean it, regardless of whether he actually wrote it. So I'll take the insult on the chin, even though it was completely undeserved (ie . How can you deny the h

Oh I see Foxy, when you say machine you mean regime - with you now.

Foxy what machine has killed millions that was created 70 years ago ? I was thinking nuclear weapons but the figure you state is grossly over the death count from that machine.

Is that analysis entire Malumbu, or is there still a bit to add ?

Why do you think that was ?

lol Jeremy

Not sure on the point you're making there but wouldn't it be reasonable to say at a more reasonable price, with quality work, by workers who turn-up on time on day agreed and don't mind doing a decent day's work ?

The race, gender and ageist cards all being played in that article then.

Me too as I didn't follow-up. Bad form. Apols.