JohnL

Swansea versus Malmo tonight - on ITV4 I think Looking for something like 3-0

Isn't a contract made at some point then broken Don't know anything about that sort of law though :) KidKruger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > well it's down to Laura to sort it out, via > anybody she hired or otherwise. she didn't > pass-on ownership of the crap. > > what Willjac described happened to me once, a guy > knocked on my door having seen the trash in my > front yard (which was steadily building-up, > waiting for a neighbour who'd offered space in a > skip he was gonna get anyway). the guy offered to > load it into his van round the corner for ?15 and > could he borrow a couple of my wheelie bins with > his mate to cart the trash around there. seemed a > good deal. he came for money, when I asked about > all the mess strewn across the pavement he said > the mate had gone to get a broom and everything > will be left tidy shortly. later when I realised > ti shadn't been done, I ended-up sweeping the mess > up along pavement and round corner - where I found > evidence that my stuff had been dumped over > someone back wall at the end of the block (they'd > used a chair I'd got rid of to do this). > open-bracket unts.

Unless you're on a zero hours contract - and I can see them increasing through the ranks of the average employees. LondonMix Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hey if you are going to use projections for growth > in Iceland its fair play to do the same for the > UK! I agree though that no one knows what the > future holds. > > Forgetting the future, relative to where both > Iceland and the UK were in 2008, we in the UK are > much better off today then they are. They are > massively poorer that they were due to severe > levels of inflation and have suffered a much more > singificant recession. I wouldn't trade places > with them.

> > > And frankly, the MPs' expenses scandal saw more > money > > siphoned off from taxpayers' money than benefit > > > fraudsters! > > ?1.2 million of MPs' expenses was ordered to be > paid back. Benefit fraud is about ?1.1 billion a > year. Yes, many MPs are self-serving greedheads, > but you claim doesn't hold up. How many benefits are unclaimed - thought it was more than the fraud.

In the 80s the left argument was that the Tories will take into account charity and reduce benefits accordingly. (this was why the NHS was never allowed to be funded from charity in the past I recall) Surely they wouldn't dare !!! Penguin68 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Just out of interest Food Banks are:- > > (a) staffed by volunteers > (b) resourced (i.e materials handed out) through > donations > > Which are both quite positive things to say about > our society and > > © substantially exist to help out those who have > been caught-out by unforseen circumstances - > either through a sudden large non-discretionary > expenditure or because they are in a transition > status waiting for benefits to be paid. That is to > say that they exist as a safetly net to catch > those who are not being helped 'in the normal > manner'. However good the welfare and benefits > system is, there will always be anomalies and > sudden emergencies. > > Efficient food banks are a valuable addition to > the welfare and benefits system - and those who > staff them (and who fund them through donations in > cash and in kind) deserve thanks and praise. They > are, in many ways, a symptom of a healthy, not a > sick society. > > By all means rant on from the comfort of your > internet mediated lives, but for those of us who > have lived through 4 major down-turns - one of > which, in the 1970s - was substantially worse than > anything we have now, your fears of revolution are > misplaced. > > What funds the welfare state is effective > capitalism, of course there are examples where > this has gone off the rails (and the market > economy works on a long-run basis, with many > short-term hiccups) and of course the 'too big to > fail' banks need re-structuring - but remember > that where a bank does really fail - there are a > lot of little people (both those whose pension > funds have invested, those who themselves have > deposits and those who work in the banks) who > would have been terminally burned by such a > failure. It is the mark of a 'welfare state' > economy that the hardships of the many can be > shared (through taxation) across an even greater > number to lessen their impact. > > Or would you have been happy to be paying less tax > so that those whose pension funds had invested in > RBS and BoS and those who had deposits with BoS > and RBS should be beggarised and now be looking > forward to a life of penury, and those who work in > those banks would be unemployed and ditto? Bit of > a run on food banks then, I would guess.

why does the 'similar properties nearby' bit show similar prices

You do get the feeling - 10 years and nothing will change the way things are moving. More young professionals with no links to the area moving in and they really won't care about razing the whole place - so if PV want to do it properly - I'd advice now.

Series 3 has much bigger audiences in the US. If this means anything :)

Yep - originally you needed to buy acrobat writer - or whatever it was called when the internet was young. now there's loads.

The markings outside Co-op house are very evident now - can't miss them Saw someone race through them on Saturday night late - obviously didn't care.

horrible. beginning to think - bring back DDT (joking). We used to put it everywhere as child. Edit: just realised you can buy something like it - and it is really, really effective.

The riots were a crime against the state, and the people involved now know the lengths to which a state goes. So they won't do that again. We won't see sweeping up work like that for normal crime, and I don't know if we would be allowed to set-up private CCTV crime ID networks to allow others to do it on the same level. mynamehere Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Peckham Rye Snt > DATES FOR OUR STREET BRIEFINGS > Thursday 8th August 1100-1130 Peckham Rye Caf? > Thursday 15th August 1900-1930 Harris Boys > Academy > Saturday 24th August 1100-1130 Harris Girls > Academy > Consider "befriending" Peckham Rye Safer > Neighbourhoods Team on Facebook. They're trying > to be more accessible/ modern. Tell them > directly/electronically what your thoughts are. > After some thought I think one way forward is CCTV > shared by neighbours for cost and placement. Then > shame perpetrators / post their images like after > the riots. What do you all think? Just put up > with endless break-ins?

How can it take 3 hours to fix the shutters (or is that an excuse) - oh well, 63 bus and the station opened as I got to Elephant.

womanofdulwich Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > the middle one? That's blinds to me Shutters are on the outside - and as somebody said stop the sun heating the windows - and from that - the room.

Why no GPS hidden away if this is common Jah Lush Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > A car like that is stolen to order. Nice respray > and a change of number plates. Bob's yer uncle. > Hope you were insured.

Not to me But I can't appreciate anything 30s (nor could my mum - Spivs and Gangsters she used to say) . edhistory Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I don't know what a "false arcade" is. > > Give me a clue? > > I am not suggesting, but stating, that the > building in front of the station has an attractive > inter-war retail facade. > > John K

Well there's a 7 floor block of flats being built opposite Co-op house Maple house (L&Q opposite Peckham Rye) All these are shared ownership - but will attract the sort who wants gentrification if just for a property profit. Jeremy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I don't think Rye Lane is ripe for gentrification > any time soon. It's very hard to see it happening, > and that's fine. But as SJ says, the area in front > of the station is horrible. It would be great to > see the building returned to its former glory, and > the space around it opened up a bit.

No - but it was a road where loads of young children played - so hated it, was I was a boy (17) - trick was to know where everything spatially is and pick the part of the road to do it and make it obvious what you're doing and look. I remember him telling me a proper 3 pt turn (using mirrors/signals) can be executed almost anywhere (obvious exceptions and don't cross a solid line !!!) with care and consideration. Just doing it without choice of location, signal, care would be crazy driving IMHO. Sue Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > JohnL Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Watch out its not people practicing for the > test > > :) > > > > I had to do them hundreds of times - usually > same > > road. > > > > xxxxxx > > Surely your driving instructor didn't have you > doing three point turns on a main road?!?!?!?

Cameron applied for a Review Result after umpires review - page 3 of Sun to be covered with opt-in veil. Nudies 0 Prudies 2

But you now have the moral right to do something similar without guilt. and to pass the info on when selling if it gets a higher offer :)

cwtch = cuddly/hug :)

Watch out its not people practicing for the test :) I had to do them hundreds of times - usually same road. KidKruger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > 3 point turns on busy roads are selfish and lazy. > drive around the block FFS, or back into a > drive/side road then pull-out to go the other way.

It's going to rain for the rest of the summer The jet stream has moved - we all knew it :) I'm on a water meter - but don't consciously limit water - not extravagant with it either.

Rogers would have reviewed his if Watson hadn't wasted one Oh dear.

Swansea get Malmo or Hibernian representing England in the UEFA league.