I think this is a take on it that's worth reading (though I'm sure it will elicit a chorus of "they would say that"s). I'm with Chippy and Pibe on this. I don't think it crossed a line. Unlike the Countryside Alliance protest referred to in the article, it involved no intimidation. I find myself breathing a sigh of relief (and the giving up of the occasional skip of joy) that at long, long last, it feels like people (some, not enough) are engaging in the political process once more. If there had been trespass or intimidation, I would have felt differently about this protest - and indeed, I've walked away from protests where I feel a line has been crossed - but I would have felt perfectly comfortable being a part of this. If anything, I find it a rather witty response to a terrible situation (no money, no job? don't worry, have a fucking party for the jubilee! or the olympics! that'll make everything just tickitty boo, and you might get pissed enough to forget about your perilous state). Qu'ils mangent de la brioche, indeed. Annoying someone is quite different from harrassing them. Better to offer them a slice of cake than to cut off their heads, no?