Huguenot, you persist in seeing this as anti-men. It isn't - as I said earlier in a response to Loz - women hold these attitudes too. Some men, some women. Some newspapers. Some judges. Some parents. Some friends. Some people in authority. Those stats I quoted, for the most part, talked about holding women "partially responsible". That might be acceptable to you, but it isn't to me. Would you consider it acceptable in a murder case if the victim was held partially responsible? Well they used to box m'lud, so it's in a way, a bit their fault that they were beaten to death. It's incredibly simple - if a man decides to rape someone, he and he alone is responsible. It is utterly abhorrent to suggest otherwise, and I can't believe you would hold out this "partially" to justify your argument. Far from these women being anti-men, it comes across like you are anti-feminist, I wouldn't be so crass as to say anti-women, but sometimes I really do wonder. As for the cop. Well, his advice was offensive. However equally as offensive as his advice that a woman could be partly culpable for her own assault, is his use of the word slut. There is no male equivalent. The judgment it casts on women goes to the very core of sexism and the madonna / whore dichotomy. Are we protesting against one cop in Canada, or was this simply the catalyst that makes us say we're sick to the back teeth of putting up with this crap in our daily lives? And you'd better believe our experiences of this are different. Mine is real and deeply personal, and it is backed up by work I have done with women's groups. Yours, seemingly, is founded on nothing more than supposition and dented ego. Tilting at windmills? Do you want to come here and tell me to my face that I'm imagining monsters where there are none?