titch juicy

???? Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Is that Germany where they've just banned the > Burka? Except that they haven't. Merkel has called for it as part of an election pledge. Even if she does get another term, other than this she's very much a small 'c' conservative and the main opposition party, a very well organised party currently ahead in the polls is left wing.

How nice to log on to see good news for a change, no matter how small. Well done!

rahrahrah Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You can't blame government. They're responding to > what the people want. Sadly, for many that's > turning our back on those in need, driven by fear > and prejudice. Pick up a copy of the Mail, or the > Express, or the Sun and it's pretty clear what > kind of country we really are. It's depressing and > ultimately I think we're going to pay the price. > So many talented people, successful businesses and > industries will end up moving to places which are > more open, outward looking and confident. I think > that post Brexit and without a major shift in > culture Britain is going to slowly decline. I hope > I'm wrong, but the mean, little Britain mindset is > destructive and suffocating. I love London, but > have (like many others I'm sure), been wondering > whether it might not be time for a move. It's a > great, world class city but it's attached to a > largely second rate, backward looking country. You've taken the thoughts right out of my head. I will be moving to Germany some time later this year.

Loz Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > titch juicy Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > ???? Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > You Gov have published their approval > ratings. > > > Jezza is now polling negative in: > > > > > > Every Demographic - class, age, gender > > > Every Region > > > > > > AND > > > > > > among Labour voters > > > > > > That's absolutely unprecedented > > > > > > I've been trying to find a link to the results- > do > > you have one by any chance? > > http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/jeremy-corby > ns-approval-rating-slides-into-net-negative-for-ev > ery-demographic_uk_589d9c95e4b094a129ea0a87 Thanks

???? Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You Gov have published their approval ratings. > Jezza is now polling negative in: > > Every Demographic - class, age, gender > Every Region > > AND > > among Labour voters > > That's absolutely unprecedented I've been trying to find a link to the results- do you have one by any chance?

uncleglen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > NO Why not?

Nigello Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I think it is such a shame that OKR won. Both > options should have gone ahead: Camberwell and its > environs are so poorly served by anything other > than buses. Even an extension to Denmark Hill and > nothing else would have helped enormously, > especially with all the new builds in and around > the Green and down W'worth Road. Is Old Kent Road any better served? I'd argue probably worse served than Camberwell

The worst Labour leader in living memory? I mean for goodness sake, tweeting that the real fight starts now! Ummmm, how about 12 months ago Jezza?!

Defecation? Just a thought.

Penguin68 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > On the other hand cats do poo in my garden, > whereas local dogs choose the public street. Where > I am not plunging my hands to plant things. Could it be fox poo?

Why was it restricted? What reason did they give?

The problem with so many of these chains is not the coffee itself but how the baristas treat it. Essentially, without the patience and care it takes to make a decent espresso based drink.

rahrahrah Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Has anyone noticed how the Brexiters are still > really angry despite the referendum going their > way? Because now they have to look for ways to justify their vote and it's proving increasingly difficult and frustrating to do so.

I don't remember one if there was.

JohnL Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > and about the original statement about child > deaths she said > > "I must have been crazy; I should have answered > the question by reframing it and pointing out the > inherent flaws in the premise behind it. Saddam > Hussein could have prevented any child from > suffering simply by meeting his obligations. As > soon as I had spoken, I wished for the power to > freeze time and take back those words. My reply > had been a terrible mistake, hasty, clumsy and > wrong. Nothing matters more than the lives of > innocent people. I had fallen into the trap and > said something I simply did not mean. That was no > one's fault but my own". > > Both her and Trump have the same 'engage brain > before mouth' issue it seems. I can't see Trump making such a heartfelt apology though.

red devil Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Perhaps 'less significant' would be a better > description... Yes, it would. I think some folk consider Great Britain to be the Britain of Rule Britannia and the Empire; ruling the waves, manufacturing world leader etc. My point was based on that view of empire that many still seem to have. But I guess if you asked them how we would make Britain great again, many wouldn't have an answer.

Seabag Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I travel for work a fair bit lately > > When asked where I'm from, I've dropped the > 'United' & 'Great' from the answer. One woman just > laughed when I said 'Great Britain' > > I think it's the (miguided) size of the English > language and it's global reach, that's given us a > distorted view of ourselves. I think that a good number of us don't have a distorted view of ourselves- we realise that in 2016 we're relatively insignificant.

I cycled across it this morning, but took extra care on my whole route. Doesn't stop black ice being an issue though.

She tore strips off him today. I wish Angus Robertson was Labour leader- if only for PMQs.

I usually do, but thinking about it i don't know why.

red devil Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > titch juicy Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > The point is that the players were bought cheap > > and developed into players worth tens of > > millions. > > You're ignoring the fact that the current skewed > market has added a lot to their value regardless > of their 'development'. > I notice that Lamella was conveniently left out of > that list, not forgetting duds like Paulinho, > Capoue and the Romanian defender's name no one cam > remember. > I suppose I could list all of Spurs' squad and > compare them to Rashford who cost zilch. But that > would just be another poinless point-scoring > exercise. > > > > Whereas United have been trying to follow the > > Chelsea/City method of buying success. Which, > > after last season and to an extent this one > > already, is proving innefective when compared > to > > building a hungry squad invested in a > > manager's/club's way of doing things. United > > showed the way in the 90s with success based on > a > > group of players developed at the club. > > United were big spenders way before the likes of > Chlesea and City. We've always had a mixture of > big money players and home grown talent, right > back to the days of buying Denis Law from Torino > for a then whopping ?100k. When we bought Bryan > Robson for ?1.5m it was equivalent to 50% of our > income (Note Pogba's oft quoted ?89m fee which > happens to include add-ons and his agent's ?18m > cut, is no where near 50% of our current income). > When the Glazers took over we stopped buying big, > that's when Fergie came out with his classic ''no > value in the market' comment when receiving ?80m > for Ronaldo and spending a fraction of it on > Valencia, Owen and Gabriel fooking Obertan. It was > that period of a lack of investment in top quality > players that I believe has contributed to our > current situation just as much as the appointments > of Moyes and LVG have. > It's only recently with the commercial deals and > new TV money kicking-in that we can afford to > service the debt the Glazers kindly bestowed on us > and make big signings again. > All Spurs are presently doing is cutting their > cloth to suit, just like Arsenal did when they > moved to a new stadium. > When Spurs received ?80m+ for Bale they had no > problem spending it willy nilly, so save us the > moral lecturing. Once you move into your shiny new > stadium, sell the naming rights, possibly receive > the highest match day revenue for a club, lets see > how prudent you are then. > I've no beef with Spurs or their fans, in fact I'd > be very pleased if they won the league, but less > of the 'we're morally superior' attitude please. > > > > Paying players ludicrous overinflated wages > seems > > to have the opposite to the desired effect. > These > > players pick up their ?200k+ a week > irrespective > > of how they play. How much do they really care > > about the club or their teammates? > > I duuno, try asking Gareth Bale and Luka Modric... United never bought success in the same way as Chelsea or City. A rich sugar daddy throwing hundreds of millions at the first team for a quick fix. We're cutting our cloth accordingly but Joe Lewis could just as easily have thrown massive money at the first team in the same way as Abrahmovic and the Sheikh. We're running the club sensibly - not running at a huge debt. It's been the same for a long time. We're building success (hopefully) slowly and carefully. Instead of throwing money at the first team for a quick and temporary blast of success we invested big money in the academy and training facilities. The Bale money was spent, but at the end of the spend we had a zero net spend. That's the point. As far as I'm aware Bale and Modric aren't earning huge wages in the premier league. Which is what I'm talking about. La Liga is a different beast. Same with the Bundesliga, where one or two teams have spending power and the rest of the league is less competitive.

The point is that the players were bought cheap and developed into players worth tens of millions. Whereas United have been trying to follow the Chelsea/City method of buying success. Which, after last season and to an extent this one already, is proving innefective when compared to building a hungry squad invested in a manager's/club's way of doing things. United showed the way in the 90s with success based on a group of players developed at the club. Paying players ludicrous overinflated wages seems to have the opposite to the desired effect. These players pick up their ?200k+ a week irrespective of how they play. How much do they really care about the club or their teammates?

Someone's trolling.

I think Shaw might be finished as a top class footballer. Honestly. I don't know if it's long term effects from his injury but what (little, admittedly) I've seen of him he has nothing like the athleticism to be a top class full back in 2017. Speaking of young English players- how good did Tom Davies look for Everton?!