titch juicy

Surma for me. Been consistently good for the 6 odd years I've been ordering from there. Have tried a few of the others for a change but nothing has been as good.

tfwsoll Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The Boris buses also have ridiculously > uncomfortable seats. I'm not particularly tall > but I find there isn't as much leg room as the > standard buses and the seats have very little > depth to them. This exactly. I am tall and the new buses are horribly uncomfortable- whereas the current 12s have really good leg room.

I don't think there's anything in those lyrics that are any worse than thousands of other songs (rightly or wrongly)

Parkdrive Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > titch juicy Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Parkdrive Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > titch juicy Wrote: > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > ----- > > > > Parkdrive Wrote: > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > ----- > > > > > Otta Wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- > > > > > > Otta Wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- > > > > > > > Always so gracious in victory PD. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I knew I should have added a winkey > > smiley. > > > I > > > > > > never intended to cause a riot,I just > > just > > > > > ribbing > > > > > > PD. > > > > > > > > > > Otta I've no problem with your comment, > > just > > > > the > > > > > hypocritical crap from that sensitive > chap > > > > Mick. > > > > > > > > > > > > Why is Mick being Hypocritical- has he > > spouted > > > > hate-filled, spiteful nonsense on here? > > > > > > Oh behave > > > > Genuine question? Has he, I don't know? > > Lets put it this way, if this bloke is so easily > offended I take it if he was ever been standing in > the crowd at Celtic while sectarian chanting was > in full flow he would have done the decent thing > and told those responsible around him to desist, > or reported them to the stewards. Or alternatively > when Phil Neville made the infamous remarks about > 2 footing Rosicky he would have felt sufficiently > moved to contact the BBC to complain? Does he > raise the same complaint when confronted by all so > called hateful, spiteful, nasty etc behaviour in > the same way, no matter where he finds it? He and > I have history, that has more to do with this than > my remarks. You don't think it's right that you should moderate your behaviour depending on where you are?

Parkdrive Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > titch juicy Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Parkdrive Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > Otta Wrote: > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > ----- > > > > Otta Wrote: > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > ----- > > > > > Always so gracious in victory PD. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I knew I should have added a winkey smiley. > I > > > > never intended to cause a riot,I just just > > > ribbing > > > > PD. > > > > > > Otta I've no problem with your comment, just > > the > > > hypocritical crap from that sensitive chap > > Mick. > > > > > > Why is Mick being Hypocritical- has he spouted > > hate-filled, spiteful nonsense on here? > > Oh behave Genuine question? Has he, I don't know?

Parkdrive Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Otta Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Otta Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > Always so gracious in victory PD. > > > > > > > > I knew I should have added a winkey smiley. I > > never intended to cause a riot,I just just > ribbing > > PD. > > Otta I've no problem with your comment, just the > hypocritical crap from that sensitive chap Mick. Why is Mick being Hypocritical- has he spouted hate-filled, spiteful nonsense on here?

It's funny- a couple of seasons ago Ozil and Di Maria were two of the best attacking midfielders in the world. Now they look like squad players.

He new Matthew E White and Sufjan Stevens records are both delightful

not sure i'd call these trolls i don't mind a parody fake-log in

Real_Louisa Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > More time for the Blow ins to start forming a > 'look at me' queue. Maybe it'll merge with the one > for the Butchers and the posh cheese on toast > place - Lordship lane gridlocked with ironic hair, > push chairs and discarded Guardian media > supplements Haha!

Well, he did really. Boris just crossed the t's and dotted the i's.

As a driver and cyclist I don't think there's a bigger pain in the backside on the road than Boris Bikes (why are they called Boris Bikes anyway? It was Ken's idea).

Was last in Sea Cow a couple of months ago and it was good. Chips nicely cooked, Fish batter was thin and delicious and their minted mushy peas (i would never have thought minting them was necessary) were a revelation. I'm also a big fan of Cod Fellas on Bellenden Road. The worst fish and chips i've had in the area by far were from the new-ish one on East Dulwich Road. I have no idea what it's called, but it was awful.

Lowlander Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Loz Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Lowlander Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > > > Thetrainline.com (more expensive than booking > > via train companies, yet ASA turn a blind eye > to > > their > > > fraudulent claims) > > > > Really? Apart from adding the ?1 fee, I've not > > seen any difference between TTL and train > > companies prices. Have I missed something? > > Trainline charge credit card fees, postage fees > and booking fees. > > Booking direct avoids those (and you can buy > tickets for any train company from any train > company). > > East Coast used to offer 10% discount but now give > Nectar points instead. > > Southern offer a no quibble refund on unused > tickets (others charge at least ?10). > > Telegraph found that booking direct saves around > ?10 on average > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/markets/1133321 > 5/Can-Trainline-be-more-than-a-railway-middleman.h > tml I've never paid more than a pound extra. I collect my tickets from a machine at the station, which is the easiest method anyway. I'd be astonished if most train companies didn't charge to send tickets home.

titch juicy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Love the meatbodies record- there's a Ty Segall > connection there somewhere, think perhaps > meatbodies man played with TS at somepoint, or TS > has promoted them or is label mates or something. > > Going to see them on 3rd March. I'll report back. Well, they were blinkin superb.

Picture You by The Amazing Disappointed it's taken me so long to come to this band .

RosieH Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I appreciate this is a serious thread, but I > really think Suspicious Vaseline would be a great > name for a band. I just logged on to write that the threasd title would make a great old school punk band name.

49/50 I'm not married. I know the date we met and the date we started dating though. Why on earth does a 'man' need to know the words to The National Anthem?

RosieH Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Heh, no it's not. 1988?! I'm a little too young > for that, you mofos! But thanks, Quidlington - > does look like me and I did sport a spiral perm at > the time. > > Now then, Peebster, I know you are sincere, but > how can I put this kindly? On this, you're an > idiot! I think you're drawing too many inferences > based on your own hypothesis. Victoriana has been > a thing for ages. The nice Time for Tea man on > Shoreditch High Street has been sporting his > handsome moustaches for years - once considered an > eccentricity, now a subject for ridicule by the > be-gileted masses? Are Steampunkers hipsters? > Where do the neon 80s revivalists and the > lumberjacks fit with your workhouse appropriation > narrative? What makes you so sure that other > people's love of tweed is ironic where David > Carnell's is virtuous? > > At university in psychoanalysis, we learned to > draw conclusions from the evidence before us, not > seek to find confirmation of our own supposition! > (apply winky face, if you can bear it) > > I'm good friends with many people a lot of > commenters on this thread would call hipsters. > Artists, musicians, DJs, actors, film makers, tech > entrepreneurs, weird 'quirky' events organisers in > their 20s, 30s, 40s and 50s. Without exception, > they are pursuing their passions with conviction > and determination, and they are genuine and > enthusiastic when others do likewise. > > Not one of them is living off the "bank of mummy > and daddy" (hmm, cliche much?). > > There is a joy about them, because they're having > fun and loving what they do. It's refreshing and > inspiring and something that is utterly lacking > from this thread. Without exception, I have never > once heard any of them sneer at anyone else, > again, something I cannot say about this thread, > some of which makes for pretty ugly reading. > > And Otta - dressing up is for kids? Singularly > joyless. I'm currently torn between wearing my > velvet minnie mouse ears or my red velvet Snow > White bow headband for the Godfathers gig tonight. I've found love on Valentine's Day

El Pibe Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > oh rosie, you seem to be mistaking getting old for > forgetting that you were young. > > I'm pretty sure most of us expressed ourselves as > part of some subcultrure or other, we wore things > that we knew to be daft at the time but they were > still an important part of ourselves as we forged > our identity. > We haven't forgotten what we did, the parties, the > drugs, the fun stupidity. it's just we've (mostly) > moved on a bit. > > It's the job of the old to tut about the young in > a massively hypocritical fashion. > > If we were all still doing it in a tragicomic > parody of dorian gray (keeping a mental image of > ourselves forever young whilst our physical aspect > chugs toward decrepitude) then it would be us > deservfing of others' mirth. > > I guess my issue with the current expression are > two-fold. Firstly the nod to victorian/edwardian > england. It annoys me because in a world where we > are the closest we've ever been to the workhouses, > slums and vast inequality of that era, glorifying > the privileged elite by, well, the privileged > elite seems to me to be distasteful. > > Secondly it's the knowing irony. My own era, acid > house and early rave, felt like a genuine social > revolution. There *was* a genuine coming together > across social strata (however brief it lasted > until booze, coke and money divided us all again) > and we felt we were undermining the brave new > world mapped out by thatcher and friedman, we > would subvert it through drugs, love and music and > it would change us all forever. > Yeah it didn't but the naive idealism was > heartfelt. > I don't like the idea that somehow everything is a > joke, cultural bric-a-brac to show society how > you're in on the joke and they're missing the > point, what we need now more than ever is a fight > for social and political change, not finding ever > weirder ways to exploit commercialism. > If hipsters wore blue overalls with a red book in > the pocket whilst having their mioaw miaow and > craft beer i think somehw I'd be happier. > > But it's their world now, and once they've donned > their suits and started working for big business, > cv replete with all that entrepreneurial > experience it won't be long before they're sitting > in a suburban pub tutting at the latest daft > notions/fashions of the youth of tomorrow. > If they weren't I'd be rather concerned. > > And proof that even grumpy-old-me wore stupid > baggy things and had mates sporting pony tails as > we gurned and twitched in our yoof.... > > > I agree with most things you post on here EP, but I think this one is perhaps a little guilty of over-romanticising the past. I was also very much part of that scene- illegal raves in Warehouses in and around London and in natural caves in the lake district, in the late 80's and early 90's. I'm not sure any of us thought we were being subversive or changing anything. It was just a case of tripping, pilling, speeding or a combination of all three, feeling good and dancing. I don't remember a single conversation with any fellow ravers about politics, Thatcher or any important stuff, rather we just talked about how fucked we were and how good it felt. But, that's just my experience.

StraferJack Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > "It's really rather special. If's up there in > quality with a similar aesthetic to the best works > by Richard Hawley or Bill Calahan, maybe some > Leonard Cohen. " > > just seen this - you know how to sell it for sure. > Downloading now It's rather lovely- definitely hearing Bill Callahan, especially on The Stranger

Jeremy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > rahrahrah Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > I think there is a description of 'a look' in > > there, which could just as easily be described > as > > mainstream men's fashion > > But that's what happens isn't it... things tend to > eventually cross over into the mainstream, which > is of course the beginning of the end. > > > is that it's just some people feeling anger at > other's tastes > > I don't think there's genuine anger, all the > "hipster scum" stuff seems to be an exaggeration > for comic effect. Any disdain is probbaly because > most of us on here are of an age where we no > longer feel the need to conform to some kind of > fashion uniform, so we look down on others that > do... especially when in some cases they're almost > as old as us. but why do people feel the need to look down on them?

There was no argumentative intent in my post- just how I see the situation.

I imagine because he's managed to turn an exciting young side with bags of potential into a team that's only scored 12 goals in 25 prem games in the space of less than 12 months. 10 less goals than any other team in the prem.

Love the meatbodies record- there's a Ty Segall connection there somewhere, think perhaps meatbodies man played with TS at somepoint, or TS has promoted them or is label mates or something. Going to see them on 3rd March. I'll report back.