Spartacus Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > KidKruger Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > ...and perhaps that?s why BoJo avoids Kier?s > > questions. We?re heading for 400-500,000 deaths > by > > Xmas IMO, and Kier?s suggestions to date (if > acted > > upon) would have significantly reduced that. > > Interesting kid > > If the suggestions had been acted in at the time, > the curve May have had a different shape but there > is a question over would we have then unlocked > earlier and infections rose again. > One suggestion was a "firebreak" like Wales did, > but after they came out numbers went up > significantly. > > I'm not convinced that acting differently would > have a major effect on overall numbers, but the > timeframe potentially would be different > The only course of action would have been total > lock down, close borders to everyone from fay one > and act like Singapore / China but as everyone > advocated still being able to trade with Europe / > rest of the world that wouldn't have been > practical and no one would tolerate a 12 month > total removal of the right to go out if their > houses and the economy would have tanked beyond > recovery. > > Would be interesting to model the scenarios and > see what the result would be. Garbled nonsense, what are you on about please?