Dom, I am starting to get your position, though I think you are confusing community, society and State. If you are talking about the State, then yes, it could be argued that the State is too big, but community, society? I don't think so. As Mockney pointed out, it's nonsensical to talk of community or society as constructs - you may as well talk about the individual as a construct (and some commentators have). Society is a given, it exists whether we, or Mrs Thatcher, likes it. And it will outlive all of us individuals here. Your point seems to be that Mrs T wanted to inspire the disenfranchised members of society to better themselves by freeing them from regulation. Fair enough, but I don't see it. It did not happen. Of course there were always people at the bottom of the pile, but Thatcher's strident policies had the effect of creating an identifiable underclass who became trapped. I actually think she wanted to make Britain more Economically competitive and combative but knew there would be collateral damage, knew there would be a price to pay. I wouldn't say she did not care, but I would contend that she thought it was a price worth paying.