Chick

Be careful, the law changed last October and these are now enforceable.

Tis a fantastic pub.

giggirl Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You boys want to get yourself some chick lit. > That'll cheer you up. > > Hugs > > Px Stop using my name in vain pls.

I felt much the same until I read this: http://www.spacefornature.co.uk/default1f71.html?ftr=Features\Wildlife\xx+Wasps.xml

> > If you or Jeremy or Bob etc want to talk about how > you dislike the Royals as an institution, that > fine. Opinions differ. But to me then, you're > the ones "confusing the issue" with simply > congratulating Catherine on the birth. Do you know "Catherine" well?

CS, thanks for the great pictures. Where would they put the TV mast?

Another benefit scrounger to support.

Tis a fantastic butchers.

JohnL Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I still reserve the right to do so - when I so > feel. > > IOS7 will brick it properly if stolen I hear. > > > UncleBen Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Common technique amongst theiving scum. > Sometimes > > there are two of them. Do not use phones on the > > street. What is IOS7?

What????

I have and can take two or three.

> Chick - you were one of the people who seemed to > take great pleasure in goading me on the previous > thread, which eventually had to be deleted. I took no pleasure from the last sick thread about this. I didn?t goad you, just asked you to drop it several times, as did other people. As for schadenfreude, if the cap fits. I wont be posting again on this.

Try this: http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?6,819992,page=6 or: http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?6,1105806

Sue Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Fair enough, but the discussion on this thread > seems to be about different issues. > > What I meant was that I have no wish to rehash the > "discussion" on the previous thread, and I don't > suppose anybody else has either. > > Sorry if I didn't make that clear :) > > Congratulations on your "easy win" though, quids > :)) > > ETA: And actually, at the point of the comment > made about my number of posts, I'd made exactly > one more than Uncle Ben. Hardly a statistically > significant difference, I suggest :) This isn?t a discussion, it?s schadenfreude.

wongo Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Enforceable and unenforceable yellow box > junctions: > > http://ticketfighter.co.uk/yellow-box-junctions/ Thanks for this website.

Will it still be a pub?

You are disgusting. Vicanna Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > of course, the > self-pitying losers around the abandoned > collieries who still cling to past grievances in > order to justify the moral and economic ditch they > live in.

> > I popped into teh Vic at the weekend with a > woodrot junior for an unscheduled bog stop - it > was indeed packed to the rafters with thrusting > breeders and their offspring - as I was > disshevelled, scowling and unshaven, lurking > around the bookcase area waiting for them, several > of 'em started eyeing me suspiciously and moved > their bags behind them/ phones off the table. > > not one of us > > > *sucks teeth* Woodrot, I always thought you were a woman.

Dont worry about Woodrot, she's just an old cat lover.

Mighael, re you coming to the book club?

And there are two shit hot book clubs. Sorry, literary associations.

Well that's a good description

There aint no ginger in the house of Windsor

The intention is to deter and scare them off.

Woodrot get a cat.