LegalEagle-ish

I liked his humour (BBW not TLS) cos I like to shock people out of their comas, so I'll miss his stuff. He did sail close to the wind though and even I thought he'd gone a bit too far occasionally, but he's only young, so he's just learning his shock jock parameters.

Thanks guys, will come straight from work cos if I go home first I'll just veg out and miss it! Again!

Ok i'm not chicken like you lot. This is me - I was doing the Morticia thing at the time so don't normally look quite so scary - but I do like my men to be obedient. Single men of Dulwich, please form an orderly queue!

I've been before but can't remember how to get there. What buses go nearby?

I love the wierd and wonderful facts that fill your head Brendan!!

Totally funny comments though.

daizie Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > No thank you Legal, i dont think i could date > someone i could have given birth to. Is he after > a roof over his head, a bit of turkey and some > christmas stuffing ? Lol, he was only going to be staying for a couple of days, but I reckon he might have hoped for a bit of stuffing!

I have a friend in the British army who I write to occasionally because he has no family here in the UK. He is posted in Germany and would have been an ok catch if I were ever to be in the same country as him when I was actually single!! Does anyone want to take him off my hands?? He is due back in the UK just before Christmas and he's a total sweety. He's another young one though - and I've never been there - just incase you were wondering!!!

Of course darling - aren't we all!! Ladymuck Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > LegalEagle-ish Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Lol, I have had a much younger partner before, > but > > this guy is totally different. Really switched > on > > and intelligent. Plus he thinks I'm great, so > far, > > lol! I'm still pinching myself ro see if I'm > > dreaming, but will take it slow. Once bitten > and > > all that! > > > You must be pretty fab yourself to have attracted > this delicious sounding plum...now will you stop > wasting time!;-)

Lol, I have had a much younger partner before, but this guy is totally different. Really switched on and intelligent. Plus he thinks I'm great, so far, lol! I'm still pinching myself ro see if I'm dreaming, but will take it slow. Once bitten and all that!

My daughter just hooked me up with a solvent, good looking, intelligent, sporty guy who I got on really well with - only problem is that he's under 28 and I'm not!! Should I go for a possible short-term romance with handsome young dude, or should I stick it out until I find 'the one' that might last into old age?? Hmmn, hard choice. Get it while you can has always been my motto!!!! But maybe I should grow up! What say you wise old tarts who understand my predicament??

That's cos all the good ones are taken. or too young!

Peckham is ripe pickings in my opinion as is Brixton. But I am bored of shag friends and was hoping to meet someone to have the occasional conversation with, but while I was pursuing a life of excitement and orgasms, all the stable conversationalists got nabbed by the more canny women folk. So women like me and Dazie are left with the dregs. That's all.

Well done - I like to see well thought out, considered posts, especially as I love dogs, but am not keen on dangerous ones myself.

Lol, but all seemingly so hard to find in a 30/40 something guy who is also single! I've given up. I am now happy to become a mad cat lady!

No addictions, own teeth, no beer belly, wash regularly and no psychotic illnesses. Having a job is a positive too.

Lol, thank you Quids, finally someone understands what I was banging on about!

Also race is not something you can change - but Nationality or national identity you can.

You are missing the very logical point i am trying to make. Racism is making judgement/comment based on race. Nationalism is making judgement/comment based on nationality. I have never heard of anyone being called a paki who was not brown skinned and this was exactly why the strictly come dancing guy made his remark - because the person he was addressing had become brown skinned. This is clearly a comment based on race or percieved similarity to a race - not nationality. Ergo this is racism. I am not saying what is bad or what is good. I am just explaining the difference. The Scot comment is a comment based on nationality, not race. If you want to argue that nationalism is as bad as racism, that's totally up to you, but to confuse nationalism with racism is incorrect and driving me nuts. One is about skin colour, the other is about place of birth, childhoood or where you settled in the world. As an aside, it is contrary to international (and domestic) law to discriminate against a person based on their race, but it is not illegal to discriminate on the basis of nationality, which is why we have passports and border controls etc.

No decent single 30-40 yr old men in ED. I've already checked. You need to start paying for it hunny!

I didn't want to give this crap any more oxygen but am kind of pissed off that people seem to be missing my point. A friend of mine who is half arab (her description) and was brought up by her white mum was called paki and bullied mercilessly all of her childhood despite having no relatives hailing from Pakistan. It was her colour that attracted the description paki, so this is not a shortened friendly way of describing someone whose nationality is Pakistani, it is a racist insult and always has been. I know young Afghan boys living in the UK who are also called paki in school in London, now as a racist insult. This is not an old term that no longer carries racist overtones, it is still a racist insult. Also some of my neighbours in Elephant & Castle were called paki despite being British, and their families coming from Bangladesh. They had never been to Pakistan nor had any relatives from Pakistan, so again, the use of the word paki, was an insult being used because of the persons couour,, not their nationality. Being brown can elicit the description paki - this is racist. Now let's look at the comparison 'Scot'. A Scot is someone with Scottish nationality. Being white from some other country is unlikely to result in you being called dour or any other kind of Scot. SO THIS IS NOT A RACIST TERM - THIS IS A DESCRIPTION OF SOMEONES NATIONALITY! So comparing the two terms is like comparing types of cheese with a brand of chalk. Someone from Pakistan can be white, black, asian etc, but only someone brown would be called a paki. I rest my case.

What country are un muzzled dogs not allowed on the street?

Making any comments about a nationality is nationalist, not racist. Please stop confusing the two.

Scot does not describe a race, being Scottish is describing your nationality. Paki isn't used to describe a nationality as it tends to be used against anyone who is asian looking, so is a rascist description, not a description of someone's nationality.

There have been a few cat haters on hete too. I think you may only be safe if you keep goldfish!