LegalEagle-ish

It seems there may be a few Lotharios not all pox ridden, and not necessarily the same ones harrassing the various women who seem not to know each other - so it's all got a bit confusing now. Not sure if the poxy guy is actually a white guy, as he seems not to be part of the 'exotic' crew, so i'm off to have a cup of tea and hope someone can explain what actually happened!

Haha, oh my God, that would be degrading to women Asset, don't do that!

Yeh i agree, the 'exotic' men bit was a bit wrong - I would have preferred a full description but I think that was the best the poster could think of to describe the guy as not a white guy I reckon, after everyone started screaming libel at her. Bit of a crap description - but the guy's behaviour is still wrong and women should be warned, in my opinion.

Just read the latest con woman stuff and can't beleive people are up in arms, thinking of making a citizen's arrest and calling 999 because this woman has conned a few people with more money than sense out of a fiver or so but you guys think that the guy conning women into dropping their nickers and giving them a dose is 'just what guys do'.

HonaloochieB Wrote: > Looking at the latter part of LEish's message, if > you pork a scrubber then make sure you don't sit > in judgement. > Seriously, think of Jesus and Mary Magdelene > (allegedly). DID HE JUDGE? > Actually, did he? Not sure about the porking the scrubber bit - i'm female and wouldn't judge a girl for being a scrubber anyway - or a guy for putting it about. What is wrong with the guy in question is the deceipt he uses to get into womens nickers. If he was honest maybe he would never get a shag cos the scrubbers who might normally repond in the affirmative can spot a wanker a mile off due to their vast experience in these matters so he probably targets less canny women who he gets to think he actually likes them and is looking for a relationship. Then after he has shagged them he drops the bombshell that he has a wife and kids and was just using them for a shag. A normal tw@t would have kept that bit quiet, just left and not called, but this guy seems to enjoy watching the woman's reaction when he tells her he's just pulled a fast one. Then on top of that - he gives her the pox. In my opinion he is an extra-ordinary tw@t. So hands up guys, how many of you think that would be a normal way to treat a woman - even if you were dying for a shag?

Even if it was posted by a troll!

Ok, but even if it was a load of old rubbish - I can't believe people would blame a woman who was conned by someone like that for real. It would be getting a shag under false pretences, emotional deception and grimness of the highest order so if I had been the person who stupidly expected a guy like that to act like an adult and got treated like that, I would probably have got a picture of him in the altogether and posted a fully illustrated account of how disgusting the guy was! It's the kind of double standard thing about women who like sex that is the undercurrent that I object to. If it had been someone lying to a man about his bloody car, you would all have been up in arms in defence of the conned guy, but cos it's about a woman who shagged a man she barely knew, then she si the one who gets condemmned. Pisses me off.

Maybe the original poster would have done a better job if she had laid the facts out - but just because she has obviously got some kind of emotional link to this guy, that doesn't mean that what she said should necessarily be dismissed. It makes me think of those women who put up posters of their cheating ex's naming and shaming them, maybe I wouldn't do it the same way, but I can understand why someone would fell hurt and feel the need to expose the person concerned - but acting out of revenge or hurt doesn't negate the seriousness of what happened, if he did actually do all that stuff.

Even if it was spread in a malicious way, if the facts are true there is no libel, sorry Asset - that's why the News of the World get away with printing the shit they do. If it's based on some truth they can be really obnoxious about how they report whatever it is.

I have no idea who this dude might be, but if this is true I think he should be exposed because whether you think the women are idiots for beleiving him or not, we don't blame shops or banks for being robbed because they stupidly have loads of cash on their premises and should know better cos there are villians around.

So if someone forgets to pick up their dogs shit or acts funny and whistles on the street then it's ok to post endlessly about that but if some creepy tw@t possibly harrasses women who go to the shop he works in, shags them by lying about his feelings and omitting to mention the wife and kids plus knowingly spreads SDT's around the place, then somehow it's the women who are in the wrong for posting about this pri(k?

True

Also if you have proof that the statement is true then even if you name the person it can't be libelous - so getting statements from the victims of his assault (knowingly passing an STD to someone can be an assault if the person suffers harm) should be enough proof. If you feel this guy should be exposed to keep other gullible women safe, then just get your evidence and go for it.

This made me laugh - I want to know who the sleazy, scummy clap spreader is - not cos I was thinking of giving him one - but just so I can walk past with a knowing smirk. By the way if the guy isn't named, or you give him a nickname like clapper slapper or something, then you can't be done for libel unless you stick his pic up or something. Here is a very interesting bit of rubbish I was reading from somewhere and I think it's pretty accurate:

And don't get me started on the evils of refined carbs and sugar!

It's not just the sh!t they put in processed food, including bread, milk and spay on our veg - the amount of chemicals that are in our homes nowadays are buggering up peoples immune systems and causing loads of non-specific ilness symtoms like fatigue, depression, headaches and lack of concentration. We have chemicals in our toothpaste, shampoo, soap, deodrant, cleaning products, face wipes, arse wipes, toilet roll, air spray, make-up, face cream, body cream ... and we absorb these chemiicals in random variations through our skin, lungs, gums, scalp etc without even thinking about it.

I'm really suprised it got so many nominations cos it looked like a pile of cr@p in the trailers.

I took my dog out on Dawson Hill on Sunday night when the snow started and he got over-excited chasing snowballs and stuff so banged into me like a steam train and knocked my legs out from under me! I landed on my @rse with a massive thud and my old man laughed his t!ts off. I was fairly happy when he slipped on his @rse 5 minutes later in front of a load of kids when he didn't spot the mirror-like slide they'd made on the path down from the flats.

I turned up after mpst people had gone home but managed to drag my very shy other half along with me. Good night tho!

I'm waiting till next week.

getting my kids to lie about their ages on buses/entry to cinema/attractions etc. Does that make me a terrible mum?

Very talented

Best call an ambulance quick.

Oh yes and i'm gona get drunk in the EDT tonight - positively overflowing now!

Over half full: 1. Still have a job even if it's only part-time 2. boss wants to pay for my accreditation eams (and can ask for a pay rise when I pass with flying colours) 3. credit crunch hasn't really his me cos I only ever use a debit card and don't have a mortgage! 4. Used to being broke so no depressing downturn for me!!! 5. Just discovered crashpadder.com for extra money to put people up on my sofa -woopeee it's spilling over for me now!!!!