Ladymuck

brum Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > LegalEagle-ish Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Brum why isn't your pic up there? You are hot... ...and you haven't seen him in his French Fireman's uniform....or have you?....Brum?!!! (*dials Brum's number*)

HAL9000 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- My Dear LadyM, please PM me with BBW's email > address... I already have (at about 2.00 am - this morning!)- you couldn't have been logged in this morning. xx

woofmarkthedog Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > No, post ahead (*huge burst of laughter*) You are bad woofmarkthedog ...but I thank you for providing the light relief. (*opens window to let in more air*)

HAL9000 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > BBW added his email address... Would anyone... > confirm my memory... Mark (of Admin): do you have any objection to my posting BBW's email address here?

SeanMacGabhann Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'm happy enough to repeat what he wrote about me... Please - be my guest... However, if you are seriously intending reproducing the post then it would have to be in its entirety. To reproduce a small section could place matters out of context and could be misleading. This to my mind would be quite improper, not to mention potentially damaging to BBW.

bignumber5 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- ...The dissect-the-incident whinging that seems to follow every little hiccup on this forum is almost as annoying as the incidents themselves: have admin and the moderators ever given cause to suggest that they are being oppressive or unreasonable? ...largely down to the fact that the same whingers are whinging about the same rubbish... I am assuming the above is not a rhetorical question. In answer to: have admin and the moderators ever given cause to suggest that they are being oppressive? I believe the answer is a categorical "no". In answer to: have admin and the moderators ever given cause to suggest that they are being unreasonable? Again, it is my belief that the answer is "no". And it is, perhaps ironically, precisely because of this, that when BBW requested my help that I agreed to post his reply on his behalf (given that he is in "read-only" mode insofar as his access to the Forum is concerned). That Admin saw fit to remove the posting, for me is regrettable purely because I believe that everyone should be entitled to a right of reply. However, the reply did contain e.g. some specific name-calling which might have caused annoyance - perhaps even offence - to those at whom it was directed. Personally, I genuinely didn't regard the "name-calling" etc. as offensive - certainly in terms of what Admin generally deem acceptable on the Forum on a day-to day basis. And, insofar as the words came from BBW, I thought they were tame. But clearly Admin didn't agree and the reply was removed. I did consider forwarding the "reply" onto Admin for approval prior to posting it...but, following much thought (and a consultation with hubby!) considered there was no need. On hindsight, this is where I went wrong and BBW is the one who has actually lost out as a result. Furthermore, I suspect I may have betrayed Admin's trust - if so, it was not intentional. I do not regret having attempted to help out another forumite. I knew that my actions would be controversial and that they would make me even less popular than I already am to a few. But I was prepared to take that risk because (a) of the principle of the right to reply and (b) this is such a well run Forum. I certainly did not do it to encourage whinging or argument.

brum Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Did someone mention pudding? Yes it's yoghurt today! (sorry everyone - private joke)

I was told that this response via Lady Muck was going to be "devoid of anything offensive", it was not and so has been removed The Administrator

brum Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > See, Daizie? Ladymuck has seen it. You don't want > to end up like her, do you? Even her feet have > grown hair, apparently. Yes, but I'm a Hobbit...what's your excuse? Mind you Daizie, if I'm really really honest...he does look rather dashing in his French Fireman's uniform...not bad at all for someone who remembers "O" levels, the sixpence, and wears ....!!!

HonaloochieB Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- >....your TAF *massive burst of laughter*...had to think about that one, but very very funny! > ...TAF seems unworthy of your > time and frienship. Well said HB (and in English too)! Though I would add that (to my mind) the "friendship must have been on shaky ground to begin with (true friends do not do this sort of thing to each other).

Thanks guys - now sorted.

brum Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > No Daizie I won't do that. Its not for the > squemish. *posts from a laptop in padded cell* Yes...I can confirm that...(*loud piercing scream AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH*)

I have been trying to contact Admin. but have failed miserably. Email was impossible as, after I'd tediously typed up my (rather long) message and given email address etc., the "pop-up" box wanted further information (to do with servers?) which I haven't a clue about. I then attempted a PM - addressed to "Admin"...but that did not work either. How may I send Admin a message please? Admin? Anybody?

SteveT Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You'll just have to join the 12 tinnies for a > tenner club at the supermarket Mick Mac. What?! That's extortionate...I'm surprised at you SteveT. I pay no more then 94p for 4 (large) cans (Sainsbury's Basics range). Not a penny more...do you hear me? (*attempts to stifle a laugh*). The slugs in the garden just love it!

Hope I'm not too late, but check this out: http://www.premierinn.com/pti/home.do?CMP=KNC-Google_brand. They don't have the 5* trimmings, but their rooms are spotless, modern and comfortable...and you get tea and biscuits etc! Have a lovely time whatever you do xxx PS: Beds are good too (*winks mischievously at PR*)

Brendan Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Really? In London? Yes Brendan...really. Having been happily married to a black man for 31 years, I can confirm all of it (and much much worse). Generally: I would just like to say that I find some of the content on this thread far uglier than anything I have ever read by BBW...though I accept that I have missed some of his posts, it seems. I cannot comment on TLS as I am unable to recall his posts. Daizie: I bet when you started this thread you didn't see any of this coming! Eight pages? Jeez... I too am retiring from this thread.

HAL9000 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > .............my two cents' worth. Oh Welcome Back "O Wise One"!

monica Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > oooh LM only if you are my lady in waiting *looks genuinely scared and legs it and, when safely over a wall, laughs tits off*

Mick Mac Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Did someone use the s word? Do women still wear those things?

Mick Mac Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Did someone use the s word? Do women still wear those things?

HonaloochieB Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Remember, what HAPPENED in the Nunhead Forum, > stays so unread by anyone it could feasibly be > classified TOP SECRET. > > HUGS Hmmmm...*attempts to keep a straight face in HB's presence* As HB turns to walk away... *bursts out laughing, quickly stifles laughter with hand, and shouts: "hugs back"* THE END.

HonaloochieB Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Remember, what HAPPENED in the Nunhead Forum, > stays so unread by anyone it could feasibly be > classified TOP SECRET. > > HUGS Hmmmm...*attempts to keep a straight face in HB's presence* As HB turns to walk away... *bursts out laughing, quickly stifles laughter with hand, and shouts: "hugs back"* THE END.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > LadyMuck - Yep I know what you were responding to > - but I responded to that post by quids and he > responded to me with the quote I used. So I used > that to point out there was, not a withdrawal, but > like I said, a major qualification hmmmm... *scratches head*

SeanMacGabhann Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > LadyMuck - Yep I know what you were responding to > - but I responded to that post by quids and he > responded to me with the quote I used. So I used > that to point out there was, not a withdrawal, but > like I said, a major qualification hmmmm... *scratches head*

SeanMacGabhann Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Not a withdrawal but certainly a stonking > qualification Sean, we are definitely not on the same wave-length (or planet even?)...my comment was in response to: ???? Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- >...just a > different and less 'liberal' (hahaha) view than > the pious, hideously white, Guardian views put out > by smug, affluent bourgeois who would whisk their > families away from any school that became 'too > diverse' quicker than you can say "How about Kent > darling?". Anyway, I'm not so impressed with him now that he banked that "100" again...the sly puss...;-) *sulks*