Ladymuck

DJKillaQueen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > In America where there are high tuition fees the > result has been a two tier system...Is that really what we want > here?... No, of course not. The idea of a two-tier system, with one type of education for one type of person and another type of education for another type of person would be a massive step backwards. I am hoping this will not happen given the progressive elements of the latest proposals. However, I do think that there will be more pressure on students to work (either full or part-time) whilst undertaking their degree (though whether they are able to secure employment is another question, of course).

Sorry, forgot to provide the link: IFS on Higher Education Reforms.

I did my degree at evening classes whilst working full-time. It took me five years. I remember tears and stress, and as for the number of times I almost gave up because of severe sleep deprivation and the feeling of being unable to "keep on top", it's a wonder I managed it. But the satisfaction of finally getting that degree was all the greater as a result of that stress. The reason I chose to study part-time was solely on grounds of cost. I simply could not afford to give up work and pay for the course. It worked for me in the sense that I acquired no debt. For me, debt was a definite put-off and not an option. I would have liked to have studied full-time though as I feel I could have derived more enjoyment from my learnings. My performance might even have been enhanced as a result - who knows (though I did alright). Certainly, it would have been less nerve-racking. Anyway, enough about that. Here are the latest observations from the IFS (I find their analyses worthy of some respect) on the subject of Higher Education Reforms. Whilst I have concerns over the possibility of potential students being deterred from applying, I am heartened to note the progressive nature of the proposed system of graduate repayment of tuition fees. I think that is only right. I also recall recently reading that any debt would be written off after X years, but am unable to find that article for the life of me!

Oh gosh yes! It's all coming back now... That WAS a fun evening...ooooh yes And I liked that jumper Quids...

Which one Moflo? There are quite a few.

Brum, you must be so relieved. Big hugs xx

Why can't a bicycle stand up on its own? Because it's two tyred! *sniggers*

Mick Mac Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Can you get my name right please. You have just reminded me of this classic! And yeah...the Mick Mac drinks complete with Midnight Race is one of my favourites. Oh dear God...couldn't stop laughing...

Nothing false about my beard luvvy.

legalbeagle Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Ah LadyM you know I appreciate your readership and > your comments, and I'm very glad you like it. But > can you get me a step closer to international > authorship? You cannot. > > So budge over. International eh? *scratches head for a mo* *then, "budges over"* ;-)

legalbeagle Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- >...but I've sent it to various > friends etc who have all said lovely things about > it. But I'd be interested in some "professional" > opinions too. Not pat on the back, well done you, > isn't that lovely type comments, but actual > comments from people in the industry... So! I aint professional enough eh? Anyway, well done you...isn't that lovely... *pats LB on back (and legs it)*

Nice VBC... ...and that your hip and DJ's knee get better soon.

VeryBerryCherry Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > They always did in my book. ha ha...me too!

I don't know whether these are the same, but I once grew another purple variety of spud. When it came to cooking them, then turned cream...I was most disappointed. Anyway, does this now mean that chips may contribute to our 5 a day?

DJKillaQueen Wrote: --------------------------------------------------- > Universities could of course increase the number > of foreign students they accomodate... This remains a good option with potential benefits for universities/students - provided that it does not result in the displacement of our own home students.

*adopts Australian accent* STRUTHE::o

legalbeagle Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Me too! Awright darlin? Gis a kiss then. Cor, look at them...

karter Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > but i am with Brum and the > boys on this. OK - happy to be a "boy" on this occasion ::o

brum Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I think that the key reason why its not seen as a > 'normal' job, DJKQ, is that the core role of a > firefighter is to save life. It means that where > most people run out of a burning building, > firefighters run in. That's exactly right. As another firefighter put it: ?No one here has joined the job to become a millionaire. We do it to protect the public.?

SeanMacGabhann Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > sales > > is > > not > > the > > same > > as > > fighting > > > fires Quite. Firefighters risk their lives. In that respect, theirs is not a "normal" job.

Dilettante Thank you to the person who used this word in an email (and made me laugh most heartily in the process) - I hope you know who you are.

Posted by Proj London Health today, 08:44PM ("What's On..." section): The South London Press will be doing a story about the ECG cycle group this Sunday, can you email anyone you know that wants to do the Jack the Ripper cycle ride (9am at the Texaco garage / Goose Green). I compiled a document which I can email out, but more importantly, the Executive Summary I put together is just so tragic - what a beast he was! For those Lounge Lizards who do not visit the "What's On..." section but would be interested in taking part in this Jack the Ripper Cycle Ride, more about it can be found here. With the good humoured and motivating Mr. McCabe at the helm, it should be good fun.

I blame Huguenot...no reason...

700

Tuition fees in universities to face increases of up to ?9,000? ?9,000?! That's some hike for - supposedly - "public" education. And David Willetts tells MPs this is a "good deal for students and universities"? I'm sorry Mr. Willett, I don't buy it. If anything, it's going to put people off from applying in the first place. How can that be good? Just what this country needs:-S.