march46

Do you mean the pedestrian crossing?

A traffic signal has failed and this is now news?! Where was ‘One Dulwich’ / Richard Aldwinkle with his faux concern when the traffic lights failed last weekend at the East Dulwich Grove junction with Townley Rd? That was dangerous.

The monitoring data shows all roads have less traffic than pre covid, with the exception of the ends of East Dulwich Grove (central is down) and Burbage Rd. This data is pretty old though, would be good to see it refreshed.

A reminder that monitoring data on the whole shows reduced vehicle journeys in this area since pre covid. https://www.southwark.gov.uk/transport-and-roads/improving-our-streets/live-projects/streetspace/traffic-data-analysis

Anyone with information is asked to call police on 101 quoting CAD 3536/09Nov https://southwarknews.co.uk/featured/police-tracing-man-after-sexual-assault-of-woman-on-lordship-lane/

I’ve been through the square a few times this weekend and every time there have been lots of people benefitting from having somewhere to sit. Great it’s so close to Au Ciel, they were taking customer’s coffees and cakes over to people wishing to sit on the benches.

It’s low cost, temporary and uses upcycled wood while the permanent design is being developed. Seating is needed. It seems there are people in the village who simply like to complain. Too cheap = complain. Too expensive = complain.

Saw lots of children having fun, enjoying the wooden marble run that’s underneath the notice board there today. The cafe owner said how much she loves it, and the cheese shop are happy that something positive is being done with the space.

Given the new seating doesn’t feature in either of the permanent designs I think we can assume it’s temporary.

The gate is meant to be locked at dusk. Sainsbury’s is responsible.

The new seating is great - colourful, functional, sustainable! Brilliant that the legacy of the Colour Pavilion by BAME artist Yinka Ilori continues in Dulwich https://www.dulwichpicturegallery.org.uk/about/news-blog/2020/february/the-colour-palace-planters/

Yes it is off-topic, but interested to know exactly what is worrying about a council tackling dangerous speeding?? I would love Southwark to do the same. The roads aren’t safe with drivers regularly ignoring and greatly exceeding the 20mph limit.

Which school? Might be worth making them aware.

Agreed, they all look a mess.

Wasn?t aware that school was in Southwark, as the article suggests

Thanks for the reminder rahrahrah. I?m always amazed at the comments that there is increased pollution when there is zero evidence for it. People are entitled to their own opinions of course, but there is only one set of facts and as you say - active travel is up, vehicles journeys down. rahrahrah Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Just a reminder that latest data shows traffic is > down at all monitored sites, compared with pre > pandemic levels. The only exception is EDG East > (between Melbourne Grove South and junction with > LL, where traffic has been diverted away from a > school entrance and now continues down the road > before turning). Cycling and walking are up. > Pollution has NOT increased. Despite the continual > hyperbole, opinion and misinformation on this > thread, the LTN has objectively succeeded in > increasing active travel and reducing traffic and > car use.

It's going to be a Megan's, opening soon. https://megans.co.uk/east-dulwich-restaurants-megans/

Saw this on Twitter, the ?Ground Zero? reference is horribly distasteful and wholly inappropriate. Deeply worrying coming from a Conservative candidate who wants to represent the Dulwich Village community.

Suspect they are standing for Lib Dems as paper candidates as they?re not actively campaigning here. Can?t imagine that being helpful for the area if they were to get elected.

You see that @heartblock, other people see the huge increase (7 times) in children using Calton to safely get to school.

Traffic is down 12% and cycling up 61% - the schemes aren?t perfect but those are positive results.

This is veering massively off-topic, but just to clarify - there isn?t a ?recommended stage?. There is a list of applications, some basic checks will have been done I assume but the real rigour in the process is before the applicant receives the cheque - there are lots of additional forms to fill in, documents to provide etc before the funds are released. This is another example of people seeking a conspiracy when there isn?t one. heartblock Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The whole thing is very confusing, but I also > cannot understand how it gets to the 'recommended' > stage without due diligence,

Slarti you mustn't be familiar with the process for these grants. The lists that are published online are the long list of all applications. The meeting is the point at which the councillors announce the ones that have been successful, and for how much (not always the full amount).

ab29 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I donated to One Dulwich and have no problem with > that. Need to keep trying as long as there is hope > to remove the harmful, unjust and utterly > ineffective scheme which is LTN. The rest of the > money can be donated or, even better, used to > remove the planters and bollards currently > blocking the roads. How much is left?

One Dulwich update - ?The QC?s opinion is that the Council did not act unlawfully when it made the permanent traffic orders on 10 February 2022, so we have no grounds for a case.? ?28k well spent?