CPR Dave

Lol a wine delivery service is going to go down really well with all the numbers in Melbourne Grove who don't like strangers using their road.

I guess Sandra, hill Billy etc are very worried that this Vote them Out campaign is going to work. If they had anything convincing or positive to say about their own candidates they would be doing so instead of going round making disingenuous smears.

The situation could be avoided by keeping your plants on your own property and not blocking the pavement.

The Lordship is very good actually too. Has anyone tried the newly refurbished Plough yet?

No one can take that seriously though Red Post because for people in your campaign there is no such thing as non-frivolous car use. You won't accept any scenario that doesn't involve people exclusively riding around on bicycles. It's a frivolous position that merits no response whatsoever.

You still need to pay the ULEZ charge 24 hours a day 7 days a week if your car is not compliant, and you drive in the ULEZ zone, regardless of the CC operating hours. Don't get caught out on that!

That's a shame. You'd wipe the floor with the current shower

How did you spot that!??

Do you guys wear your tin foil cycling hats when you post these conspiracy theories??

Actually, some new councillors from any different party would be able to have an impact on the LTNs immediately because they would have access to every bit of information that has been collected and be able to open the kimono on what has been going on. That might rock the boat quite considerably. (It might not too but I, for one, and no doubt many others, have lost all confidence in the labour councillors and the employees of southwark council responsible for our LTNs).

The "hostile environment" was invented by the Labour Party, ffs. Liam Byrne was home secretary in 2007 when he came up with this "We are trying to create a much more hostile environment in this country if you are here illegally." (Source: https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2007/may/16/immigration.immigrationandpublicservices) It's not surprising people want to vote Labour out when they steadfastly refuse to take any responsibility for their own policies (not just the hostile environment, but failed LTNs too).

If most particulate pollution is not from road traffic why do we have the Ultra Low Emission Zone and Low Traffic Neighbourhoods?

Looks like the pavement is sinking there too.

It's been like that since last night. Hopefully they wont shut the water off to fix it just before dinner and bathtime, or when everyone is getting ready for work tomorrow morning , eh

LA, does that mean that they admit that they applied for funding and that they were awarded funding and then decided they didn't want it after all, but only once t was too late for someone else to be granted that money, or possibly that they never applied for it but the council embarrassed them by awarding them some money anyway? It doesn't make much sense or seem equitable whichever way it is looked at tbh

Cheaper to just put the garden waste in the green bin

I think "Clean Air Dulwich" also sometimes call themselves "Clean Air for Dulwich" which probably doesn't help, but the council have a lot of egg on their face here (once again)

The problem with diesel (as the labour government that led the dash to diesel neglected to tell us) is NOx emissions, not carbon emissions. If people are concerned about carbon specifically there are other far more anti-social activities with a high carbon foot print that get completely ignored. Like dog ownership. A typical dog has the same annual carbon foot print as a range rover. And many dog owners have no civic responsibility at all, leaving sh*t all over the pavements and parks and letting their dogs p*ss on people's private property and all over the street. Why aren't people going round deflating dogs too?

There is no way that opinion cost 28,000. Even from a QC it would be no more than 2,000 on such a simple question. How much have the council spent on this disaster though? ?750,000? ?1,000,000? More? Would be interesting to see the final figure for this unmitigated shambes.

It won't be down to the government in the end, it will just be a commercial reality that you won't be able to buy an internal combustion engine any more and shortly afterwards you won't be able to buy fuel for one. Sorry that your "anti-pollution" campaign to stop people richer than you from owning cars has failed.

If you look at what they have allowed above the old House of Tippler (alongside the M and S development) then it seems anything goes on Lordship Ln now. Sorry about that.

"Going inhouse." So things will no doubt get even better lol.

So there's a camera rather than an actual barrier? Does that mean they will be fining residents (again) who need to use their car for whatever reason instead of taking granny to hospital appointments on her electric push bike?

You can see from Google street view that weren't pneumatic tube traffic counters on the road in 2019:

You cant' really second guess Tooley St, unfortunately La. E.g. they recently allowed House of Tippler to close so that it could be replaced with an extraordinarily large block of flats and a shop selling trinkets. That was the last decent bar with live music on Lordship Lane and it is gone forever.