Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Good work James. Let's hope that puts a stop to this selfish behaviour.


James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi Nero,

> Good to hear my request has resulted in this

> visit.

> I've requested that for a while this school is

> added to the mobile CCTV rota.

> Hopefully, encouraging more acceptable behaviour

> will result in bad habits being broken.

Gubodge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry to take the thread back of track again but I

> have to respond to Domitianus, who is not aware of

> any children being knocked down in car parks? A

> three year old was killed in a housing development

> car park off Lordship Lane a year or so ago so

> whilst I'm obviously very relieved your mother

> safely guided you through the perils of car parks,

> please bear in mind that not everyone is so lucky.

>

>

> I'm not sure why you think you have a greater need

> to be close to the supermarket than someone whose

> legs are only 12 inches long. But maybe you're

> just lazy.


Does this mean that people with legs that are 18 inches long should be made to walk a further distance than those with legs 12 inches long, but not as far as those with legs 24 inches long. I guess the strapping six footers should have to walk from the very far side of the car-park? In fact, let's put in a chicane made out of Tensa-barriers like you seen in an airport or bank to really make the tall bu**ers walk?


I mean they are just lazy, after all.

Rockets Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Time for the school to take more action - they

> have a duty of care to their children and need to

> invoke some responsible parenting in their

> numb-skull clientele. The selfish attitude of some

> of the parents of kids who go to that school is

> beyond belief and someone needs to take a stand

> before someone gets hurt. Other parents at the

> school who do not cause these dangerous situations

> need to challenge those who do.



I have long been horrified by the selfish way so many parents park outside schools, but this is not a problem confined to Goodrich Primary School - unfortunately it happens at many, many schools. Whilst I would love to see parking restrictions imposed far more strictly, and parents who park or stop illegally being issued with tickets, sorting out this type of problem really isn't something that the school has any power to deal with. I know several headteachers at other primary schools in this area who have approached parents who park dangerously outside their schools, and they are usually just met with abuse. Schools have a duty of care to children when they are in their care, and that doesn't, and can't extend to parents who choose to park dangerously outside the schools. Most schools ask regularly for parking wardens to visit their schools, but are usually told that there isn't the manpower for frequent visits. I suppose when you consider that boroughs like Southwark, Lewisham, and Lambeth each have around 80 schools, the number of parking wardens needed would be huge, bearing in mind they would all be needed at the same time. The only thing that schools can really do is to write to parents regularly, or 'name and shame' illegally parked cars in their newsletters.


Parking was a problem at my daughter's infant school a few years ago, but we realised that the school was pretty much powerless to stop the problem. So a group of parents got a supply of traffic cones, set up a rota, and put them outside the school on the zig zag markings for half an hour every morning and afternoon. It solved the problem.


That would not necessarily solve the problem at Goodrich, because the road layout is different, but it could be a start.

Goodrich tried the cones a few years back when Mr Coleman was still headmaster. Unbelievably some parents would get out of their car and move them to one side or even just push them out of the way with their cars. Some of us parents ended up trying to "guard" the cones but had to regularly put up with abuse and aggression from the offending parents.

Hi Pepsi, we are just trying to keep this on thread, which its seems to be.



pepsi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I wasn't really replying to your post, I was

> referring to the post on p. 3. And I'll discuss

> whatever I please on here thanks, it's an open

> forum.

>

>

> Ant Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > And the people I saw this morning weren't in a

> > 4X4. Please let's lose track of the real point

> > being discussed here: people's behaviour. It's

> not

> > what car they drive, but how they drive it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I no longer feel safe walking in ED on two feet with health issues….sad really but that is the reality - safer riding a bike around- doubt it - might be faster but  at the end of the day,  be it walking or cycling, if one shouted as in need, say 11 ish - how many people would open their door and help?   We are talking 2025…..  
    • So it wasn't recent then....................................
    • A pretty awful incident.  Thankfully from my time in London fairly rare.  There was a time, particularly in North London in the 00s when moped gangs would come up behind cyclists and grab their bags.  There were also scare stories about riders being pushed off at the top of the hill and the bike grabbed, or cyclists being pushed into a canal such as the Grand Union.  I think these were very exaggerated. In recent times, cyclists, in particularly women, have been mugged, on cycle routes when other riders are not around, such as Deptford/Millwall  https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm27x5klxxlo But I expect that crimes involving threats/violence by criminals against cyclists are less likely than in other areas of life.  Mobile phone theft being one of the obvious examples.  I was told many years ago following a burglary that criminals would rather not have any contact with their victims, and bike theft would sound to be less risky to them by stealing locked up bikes (far too common) rather than attacking the rider.  The spate of thefts from builders vans in broad daylight knocks this a little on the head, as the criminals are often confronted. @Rockets as a regular cyclist in the past did you experience threats etc?  My worse experiences were being knocked off by dangerous drivers, once being left for dead in a hit and run, and road rage where drivers chased me or threatened me after they had passed to close, turned across me etc.  You learn from this and do your best to avoid such conflict.  
    • Whilst I am not sure if this is appropriate to this case, I know that often people from minority groups don't feel safe with the police and there have been many incidents where people from minority groups have been mistreated, beaten etc, just for being.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...