Jump to content

Recommended Posts

On my way from Lordship Lane Sation to East Dulwich Station I counted 19 estates agents (excluding Foxtons).


Into the early 1970s I seem to remember there were three estates agents only.


Why this substantial increase? Is it an index of the dysfunctionality of the East Dulwich community? Are there now so many transients?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1030-estate-agents-19/
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

We shall see how the Estate Agents manage to fare. Did anyone see this morning's TImes? Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors, which had previously predicted at least three percent increase in London's house prices next year (same as Nationwide), has now reviewed its forecast to reveal NO INCREASE AT ALL and a one in ten chance of a 1990's-like crash!


Also the property website, Right-move, has shown a fall in London property prices last month of 2.5%. Crumbs!

A quick look at Rightmove suggests that perhaps 30 "properties" (god I hate that word) are coming onto the market each week at present in SE22. Foxtons say they are looking for 200 properties for their 0% offer, and they've probably hooked a fair portion of these already. So, you can expect that a large number of Foxton properties will hit the market on launch day. Prepare for a sudden flood of properties on the market, with Foxton signs everywhere. I wonder if this might mean that local prices DROP for a while because of oversupply, the opposite of Foxtons' (supposed) normal impact on local markets. Of all the local agents, I expect Haart to be the ones who will be competing most savagely with Foxtons.
  • 6 months later...
In the 1970s EAgency was still a basically small business enterprise with one shop indepndents, now it's much more a branded multi-shop business. Most in LL now are chains and they will want 'shops' in desireable areas often even if they run at a loss and certainly they can afford to run them at lower margins. Not sure if any on the Lane are sole agencies...

Muttley Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A quick look at Rightmove suggests that perhaps 30

> "properties" (god I hate that word) are coming

> onto the market each week at present in SE22.


That was September 2007. There are now about 70 coming onto the market every week and stock levels building up faster than people are buying.

  • 4 months later...

MORE AGENTS MEANS HIGHER FEES


Quite simply, the more agents there are, the fewer properties they each get to sell and so they have to offset this will higher fees. At the moment they will all be struggling to make ends meet as they still have the same outgoings as they did a year ago for rent, staffing, advertising, cars etc yet are selling fewer properties.


We only use an estate agent when we move house, for the rest of the time they offer nothing to our community and high street.


How many agents would it take to create some competition in any given area? 3, 4, 5?


The sooner some close the better.

Mine was a general question about the equilibrium number for estate agents in post-property boom East Dulwich. It was not an attack on estate agents.


I'm also interested in the impact on East Dulwich of void shops (downside) and falling cost of retail rents/lease (upside).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • My experience with phone shops is that they hand the phone to you to key in passwords etc.
    • The minutes of the licensing sub-committee meeting of 24 July are at https://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/documents/g8329/Printed minutes Thursday 24-Jul-2025 10.00 Licensing Sub-Committee.pdf?T=1.  The  application was granted. Incidentally, the attached covering letter of 7 May does name Tesco as the applicant in all three of the planning applications I listed above in my 30 October post. 25_AP_1351-COVERING_LETTER-4061593.docx
    • Please consider any security issues associated with someone helping. Does the person have good intentions? Do they know what they are doing? Will they require your passwords or screen unlock. Will they set them for you and consequently know them? Will they store them for you? Are you sharing passwords you cannot change immediately after or are used in other places? Will they recommend apps that potentially open up security or privacy issues you do not know about. It is a bit of a minefield depending on what help you need 🙂
    • I think it's outrageous that he thinks he can do this. This is about reducing waiting lists. How dare he seek to fundamentally change the judicial system to address administrative failings (for which he is responsible). Courts are notoriously slow. Judges are slow. Perhaps look at WHY there are so many cases - what's going on? is crime going through the roof? Why not more judges, why not look at how court admin is managed?  We had one judge - over retirement age, who only worked once a week (possibly) and was slow, frail and no idea about emails etc. no sense of urgency. I actually complained which did hurry things up.  This is not a dynamic private company who wants to get things done - it takes time, it's a complicated and thorough process. RIGHTLY SO.  As least he's not lifting the lid on free legal aid and increasing the tax payers funding of it.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...