Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There is nothing wrong with too many estate agents, I for one would have been stuck with one crappy Foxtons valuation of my home otherwise and considering a house is the most important investment in most peoples lives it seems perfectly ok to me that we have a choice so that we can have a bit of competition. Lets face it, what would replace all these estate agents anyhow? Yet another boutique no one goes to? I'd rather look at bland pictures of an interior of a 2 bed flat than some poncy kitchen utensil I wouldnt dream of buying unless I had a screw loose.


Louisa.

Quite simply, the more agents there are, the fewer

properties they each get to sell and so they have

to offset this will higher fees



I am not an economist but I thought things worked the other way round. The more agents there are means more competition so they have to reduce prices to get the job.

AndrewDBlack - I have to admit, I am the son of an economist - not that in any way I claim to be an expert! Clearly If there is one sole provider in an area for any given service, then they have a monopoly. It doesn't matter if it is a cable TV supplier or the train company on a certain route - we often have no choice who we can use. If there were two companies, then there would be a choice. Three or four would be healthy. I really do remain to be convinced why this little high street of ours requires to have twenty estate agents. Only indian restaurants comes close. Lordship Lane offers a useful selection of local services but wouldn't it be better, if we could choose, to have fewer estate agents and a variety of everything else? like a choice of:

book shops

butchers

clothes shops

delis

fishmongers

glaziers

joiners

music shops

opticians

picture framers

printers / stationers

restaurants - another french or italian

shoe shops

video rentals

i could go on...


These are the things that I certainly use more regularly than an estate agent.

AndrewDBlack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Quite simply, the more agents there are, the

> fewer

> properties they each get to sell and so they

> have

> to offset this will higher fees

>

> I am not an economist but I thought things worked

> the other way round. The more agents there are

> means more competition so they have to reduce

> prices to get the job.



Andrew, basic 'O level' (yes, I'm really that old) economics also taught me the mantra about supply and demand determining prices, but what I've found with estate agents, regardless of how the general market is performing, is that they are open to negotiation, it's the way they and the whole buying/selling process operates.


gh is right about the oversupply of EAs on LL affecting the choice of other retailers, but what is interesting is that in the 3 years I have lived in ED I can only remember one EA (Uniplan) leaving the main LL drag (roundabout to Cop Shop) and only 1 arriving (Foxtons - boo hiss!) despite the up/downturn that has occurred in that time, so perhaps it has found it's natural level, only time and the current downturn will tell. I think most EAs will survive this downturn as their income from lettings has risen sharply to help compensate. Maybe an agent like Halifax will suffer as they rely on sales only, but the upside for them is that they have a steady supply of bargain mortgage defaults!

  • 2 months later...
  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Aria did a good job fixing a leak in our bathroom. He was very thorough and made two extra visits to make sure the job was done well. Highly recommended.
    • As a diminutive (5ft 1) woman who regularly attends the park with her four children - all under 5; two of them (twins) in a push-chair - the thread caught my eye. If there identifiable troublemakers likely to be there I want to know what they look like so I can avoid them. Isn't that "strange" of me, wishing to avoid harm coming to my children?? 😲 I have been discussing the ludicrous responses to this thread 🧵 (which I bet £100 exclusively emanate from bourgeois native Brits) with work colleagues (you would be hard pressed to find a more 'diverse' bunch in terms of age and ethnicity - except we are all female). One colleague (a Ukranian lady) made a perceptive observation that everyone seemed to agree with. When British newspapers and news websites mention an offender (e.g. 'police are asking the general public for assistance in seeking the alleged offender who is a middle-aged male'), she always assumes the offender is not of white British heritage since, if the offender is white this is usually mentioned, but seldom the other way around. Until recently racial prejudice was a thing of the past (unless in the most hardcore of families), now it is creeping back and one important factor is the perception that the indigenous general public are not being treated fairly with this sort of dishonest - some would say activist - reportage. An attitude that clearly informed the bizarre claim that my concerned inquiry was  "strange". Fact is it was anything but strange. What is strange is people denying the evidence of their own eyes and - in this case - casting aspersions on a concerned parent. 
    • Yesterday we received about 3 weeks worth of post. This included duplicate documents where we'd had to ask for another copy since the first copy never arrived, bank papers, my new driving licence and one mis-delivery.  We'd spent ages in the last few weeks either on the phone or convoluted websites trying to chase these things. I'd rally like to co,plain but have a feeling I'd be wasting my time.
    • sad news one of the few shops offering good value
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...