Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There is nothing wrong with too many estate agents, I for one would have been stuck with one crappy Foxtons valuation of my home otherwise and considering a house is the most important investment in most peoples lives it seems perfectly ok to me that we have a choice so that we can have a bit of competition. Lets face it, what would replace all these estate agents anyhow? Yet another boutique no one goes to? I'd rather look at bland pictures of an interior of a 2 bed flat than some poncy kitchen utensil I wouldnt dream of buying unless I had a screw loose.


Louisa.

Quite simply, the more agents there are, the fewer

properties they each get to sell and so they have

to offset this will higher fees



I am not an economist but I thought things worked the other way round. The more agents there are means more competition so they have to reduce prices to get the job.

AndrewDBlack - I have to admit, I am the son of an economist - not that in any way I claim to be an expert! Clearly If there is one sole provider in an area for any given service, then they have a monopoly. It doesn't matter if it is a cable TV supplier or the train company on a certain route - we often have no choice who we can use. If there were two companies, then there would be a choice. Three or four would be healthy. I really do remain to be convinced why this little high street of ours requires to have twenty estate agents. Only indian restaurants comes close. Lordship Lane offers a useful selection of local services but wouldn't it be better, if we could choose, to have fewer estate agents and a variety of everything else? like a choice of:

book shops

butchers

clothes shops

delis

fishmongers

glaziers

joiners

music shops

opticians

picture framers

printers / stationers

restaurants - another french or italian

shoe shops

video rentals

i could go on...


These are the things that I certainly use more regularly than an estate agent.

AndrewDBlack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Quite simply, the more agents there are, the

> fewer

> properties they each get to sell and so they

> have

> to offset this will higher fees

>

> I am not an economist but I thought things worked

> the other way round. The more agents there are

> means more competition so they have to reduce

> prices to get the job.



Andrew, basic 'O level' (yes, I'm really that old) economics also taught me the mantra about supply and demand determining prices, but what I've found with estate agents, regardless of how the general market is performing, is that they are open to negotiation, it's the way they and the whole buying/selling process operates.


gh is right about the oversupply of EAs on LL affecting the choice of other retailers, but what is interesting is that in the 3 years I have lived in ED I can only remember one EA (Uniplan) leaving the main LL drag (roundabout to Cop Shop) and only 1 arriving (Foxtons - boo hiss!) despite the up/downturn that has occurred in that time, so perhaps it has found it's natural level, only time and the current downturn will tell. I think most EAs will survive this downturn as their income from lettings has risen sharply to help compensate. Maybe an agent like Halifax will suffer as they rely on sales only, but the upside for them is that they have a steady supply of bargain mortgage defaults!

  • 2 months later...
  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • My experience with phone shops is that they hand the phone to you to key in passwords etc.
    • The minutes of the licensing sub-committee meeting of 24 July are at https://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/documents/g8329/Printed minutes Thursday 24-Jul-2025 10.00 Licensing Sub-Committee.pdf?T=1.  The  application was granted. Incidentally, the attached covering letter of 7 May does name Tesco as the applicant in all three of the planning applications I listed above in my 30 October post. 25_AP_1351-COVERING_LETTER-4061593.docx
    • Please consider any security issues associated with someone helping. Does the person have good intentions? Do they know what they are doing? Will they require your passwords or screen unlock. Will they set them for you and consequently know them? Will they store them for you? Are you sharing passwords you cannot change immediately after or are used in other places? Will they recommend apps that potentially open up security or privacy issues you do not know about. It is a bit of a minefield depending on what help you need 🙂
    • I think it's outrageous that he thinks he can do this. This is about reducing waiting lists. How dare he seek to fundamentally change the judicial system to address administrative failings (for which he is responsible). Courts are notoriously slow. Judges are slow. Perhaps look at WHY there are so many cases - what's going on? is crime going through the roof? Why not more judges, why not look at how court admin is managed?  We had one judge - over retirement age, who only worked once a week (possibly) and was slow, frail and no idea about emails etc. no sense of urgency. I actually complained which did hurry things up.  This is not a dynamic private company who wants to get things done - it takes time, it's a complicated and thorough process. RIGHTLY SO.  As least he's not lifting the lid on free legal aid and increasing the tax payers funding of it.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...