Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Astonishing what they've managed to cram into the place. And almost comically good humoured staff. But the rather unedifying hordes made it one of the most gymnastic gauntlets I've run in a shop in quite some time. I'm assuming the desperation to get one's hands on some mouth-wateringly ripe mango and impossibly-trimmed asparagus spears will subside in the days to come and it will soon become less of a challenge.

I disagree Chief. A 'snacky freebie' is always welcome.


If you happen to be on LL today, and don't mind a scrum, it's worth popping in for a sense of 'opening day fever'. There's a huddle of what look like M and S middle management convened on the pavement and the store itself is 'rammed', as Jeremy Corbyn would say.


Apparently expectant queues stretched down to the bank on the corner of Ashbourne Grove by the time they opened the doors this morning.

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> taper Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Oh happy day. Oh day of days. What's the

> > underpant section like?

>

>

> Its a Food Hall-- no clothes (or pants)


Oh no. But that's what I've been looking forward to for the last decade.

Haha-- its all for naught!


taper Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LondonMix Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > taper Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Oh happy day. Oh day of days. What's the

> > > underpant section like?

> >

> >

> > Its a Food Hall-- no clothes (or pants)

>

> Oh no. But that's what I've been looking forward

> to for the last decade.

derwentgrove Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just back from my first visit to the new M & S

> Food Hall where I discovered that:

>

> 1. It was very busy indeed, having opened for the

> first time at 10am today. This was not helped by

> the average customer bringing 2.5 young children

> to share the opening day excitement. Hopefully

> this will drop off once it is appreciated that

> Percy Pigs are (wisely) not positioned near the

> tills.

>

> 2. The staff were friendly and helpful. I cannot

> recall being greeted with a cheery hello or handed

> a basket at the Co-Op or Sainsbury's before.

>

> 3. The range was good: plenty of dinner ideas but

> also a decent range of fruit & veg and other

> essentials.

>

> 4. The tills were working.

>

5. There was no sign of Louisa or Dulwich Fox picketing outside.

>

> I suspected they would do well but now I am pretty

> confident about that. I would take some convincing

> to return to the Co-Op ever again.







No. I wasn't there..


Foxy ;-)

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> titch juicy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > That queue, or more to the point, the fact that

> > people are actually queuing, is hilarious.

>

>

> I'd say there's something sad about it. What are

> people expecting to find? Narnia?



Hilariously sad

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think that's a big assumption.  Many people vote for the candidate precisely because they are a member of a particular party and represent that party's policiies.  I personally didn't know who McAsh was in the last election, but I knew what party he represented.  When politicians don't act "morally" what are we to think of them and their motivations? But I think there will be people who want to vote Labour, don't know that McAsh has defected and accidentally vote Green precisely because they do vote for the name.  Yes, you could say they need to read the ballot paper more carefully but it's possible to see one thing and not notice another.
    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...