Jump to content

Recommended Posts

England outclassed by Mexico during first half although Mexico usually hold their own against the top South American countries. Maybe winning 3-1 should not be underestimated in terms of a win is a win but the football played says same old England for WC.


Great Nike WC advert (notice Rooney/Walcott wearing Umbro whilst other non Nike shirts have been blanked on Drogba/Ribery)


 

I'd go with that starting XI except I'd start with Lennon rather than Walcott.


I thought we looked v. unconvincing last night - Mexico had more chances and looked more comfortable in possession. I would expect the starting XI to be a lot tighter, but if Barry, for example, can't get fit/stay fit, we may struggle.

Seems to me King, Walcott, Baines did themselves no favours last night at all, Johnson was OK when he came on, Hart tried too hard with his distribution, Lennon not bad, and neither Milner nor Carrick should be asked to do Gareth Barry's job.


Funny game when you win 3-1 but are more worried after it than before..



re Barry he has his test tomorrow.

Don't think Walcott is up to it. Maybe he will be in future, Joe Cole used to just run and run until he got tackled, but eventually matured in to a great player. I think Theo could be the same, but at the moment, his great pace just isn't enough IMO.


Shame for King last night, didn't look anywhere near his best, and Terry will be confident of keeping his place.


I still think Heskey & Rooney up front if it's 4-4-2.


As with Liverpool this season, Gerrard just not his old self. Don't know if he's just lost it a bit, or what, but he doesn't look the player he was a season ago. That said, maybe the WC will gee him back in to action...

I'd like to know on what grounds (ha) Heskey should be selected? A forward that doesn't score but Rooney likes him around? He hasn't played much for Villa has he, so doesn't fit Capello's supposed criteria for selection. Rooney looked frustrated a lot of the time last night. Almost like that the old demons were trying to get out! I hope he keeps his cool.


Carrick is gone I'd say plus Wright P. I think he comes behind Lennon and Walcott and all 3 wont go. I was surprised by King. He didn't seem to be with it.

The grounds on which Heskey should be selected is as a physical decoy - plus he is a workhorse who makes it difficult for opposition to play football from the back unlike Crouch (too slow) or Defoe (too lazy) or Walcott (who is one trip over his shoelaces away from injury).

If I was radical I might go


James


Johnson, Terry, Ferdinand, Cole


Lennon, Lampard, Cole, Barry


Gerrard


Rooney


With Lescott, King, Green, Crouch on the bench and any of the others, don't care, although that young city fella impressed I'd send Carrick, Huddlestone and the other young tottenham player home for sure

I can't believe Maradona has not selected Cambiasso and Zanetti from Inter Milan. What England would do for those two. All I can say is the Argies must have one hell of a squad. A very good outside bet but probably the only team in the world cup where the players will have to manage the manager.
The problem we have got is that we only have one world class player and his name is Wayne Rooney. After that we have about 3 or 4 good international class players and the rest are mediocre. You don't need a team of world class players to win a world cup, but you probably need at least 3 or 4 surrounded by good international class players. Brazil, Spain and Argentina all have about 4 world class players in their team. What we do have in our favour however is a world class manager.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Link to petition if anyone would like to object: Londis Off-License Petition https://chng.it/9X4DwTDRdW
    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
    • I had some time with him recently at the local neighbourhood forum and actually was pretty impressed by him, I think he's come a long way.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...