Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Southwark's website has a maps tab. The ideas great, unfortunately they didn't think it through when it comes to content and actual usability of the maps. For example, there's no labelling of the Council Wards or Parliamentary Constituencies, but if you know roughly the shape you're looking for you can then zoom in to see the details of the boundaries.


http://www.southwark.gov.uk/info/200212/egovernment/1370/interactive_maps

Try this one. It's Ordnance Survey Election maps. It seems to work quite well.


http://www.election-maps.co.uk/index.jsp


The BBC website is quite good as well. The are no maps but it tells you which wards are changing from one constituancy to the other.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/default.stm

If it helps, Dulwich and West Norwood includes the local Southwark wards of East Dulwich, Village and College. All the others down this way are in Camberwell & Peckham.


I've noticed several "email the candidates" type web sites telling me I'm in the wrong constituency because they haven't got the new boundaries :-S

Shaw74 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Try this one. It's Ordnance Survey Election maps.

> It seems to work quite well.

> http://www.election-maps.co.uk/index.jsp


Thanks for this. But it isn?t at all easy to see the actual constituency boundaries as it is so close up and where they join the next constituency it is very unclear what is what. Personally I think they are really not fit for purpose and it is astonishing that there isn?t an official decent digital map service on constituency boundaries!

Thanks Mark. But it is frustrating that it doesn't seem to allow us to zoom in and out and see the constituency as a whole in this setting as well as this detail.


Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi Eileen,

>

> The Ordnance Survey Election maps seem to show the

> boundaries quite clearly, here they are showing

> the boundaries around Goose Green (as an example).

> You can also see the settings I've used on the

> left to achieve this, I hope it helps.

>

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/images/bou

> ndary2.jpg

>

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/images/bou

> ndary1.jpg

Burbage Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm70

> /7032/7032_iii.asp

> p.69 on the PDF (p.67 shows the old boundaries)


Thanks - Yes but it is the new constituency boundaries we need all in one place with ward boundaries as well. It is possible, but seems the authorities (ie Ordnance Survey and other Govt Depts.) haven?t got their act together. Ridiculous. Is it part of our equivalent of the US mess with hanging chads? A really important part of our democratic process being spoilt by poor mechanics.

SO... looks like I'm in Peckham and camberwell... good old Harriet 'you know where to find me' Harmen. Seeing as I'm currently avoiding the door to political candidates I just wondered if anyone was slightly more in touch with the figures as to whether it is only her who stands and chance or if the lib dems were ahead in the area or......

I'm basically voting for whoever is going to get in that isn't a tory...thanks!

Hi mrs f,

The last parliamentary elections HH well ahead, she got 65.3% of the vote, Lib Dems 18.8%, Tories 9.8%. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/vote2005/html/115.stm

Boundary changes should erode that. Also, Lib Dem fighting Labour to win Peckham Rye, Livesey and Peckham wards which should see big boost for Lib Dems.

Funny leaflets from Tories claiming its between Labour and Tories. Bumped into one of the local Tory councillor candidates who was sure they could overturn HH. He was very sweet - if clearly misguided.


Electoral Calculas is predicting HH wins http://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/ with 53.8%, Lib Dems 19.6%, Tories 15.3%. Guess they think this due to boundary changes.

Hi mrs f,

Two of your the South Camberwell ward councillors are from the Labour Party - Veronica Ward and Peter John (Southwark Labour Party leader) and one the Green Party Jenny Jones.

I don't believe the Green Party are really trying to expand in South Camberwell as little evidence of leaflets, letters or canvassing. Also, not so much from the Labour Party. At one point the Tories were talking about making it a target but no evidence this is happening. This election will seem more Lib Dem literature going out in this ward than ever before.

My guess is the Labour Party expect the increased parliamentary turnout to mean they'll cruise home and take all three local councillor seats in South Camberwell.

Hi mrs f,


Welcome to South Camberwell.


I'm sorry if my fellow candidates and I have not yet met you when we've been on the campaign trail or during one of our monthly mobile surgeries! Please let me know if there are any issues which you would like Stephen, Veronica or myself to look into.


Regards,


Peter John

  • 2 weeks later...

Presumably that Tory was 'misguided' in the same way that the Lib Dems are, claiming that only they can beat Labour in Dulwich and West Norwood?


FACT (according to the BBC Website): after the boundary changes Labour 1st, Conservative 2nd, Lib Dems 3rd in 2005 election.


FACT (according to Southwark and Lambeth Council websites): Lib Dems in 4th places in 4 out of 8 wards in 2006 local elections.

Strikes me that it's a bit of a case of damned if you do (people on here complaining about so much stuff from the Lib Dems) and damned if you don't (complaints about lack of stuff from the Conservatives)


Personally, I've found going on the party websites and the BBC much more informative than any of the leaflets!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...