Jump to content

Recommended Posts

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Me too- on a very serious note the influence of

> the RC church is a massive worry - although the

> influence of the catholic church is mercifully on

> the wane in Poland (for a start).


Wow. This debate has really brought the whackadoodles out, hasn't it! Vote out or the nuns will take over! The two largest players in the EU apart from ourselves, France and Germany, are entirely secular and have the primacy of secular law enshrined in their constitution, as does the EU. This is the most vermillion of red herrings.

You're very probably right Louisa, it will entirely depend on the colour of government we get I think; if the Tories get in again in 2020 there will almost certainly be enough backbenchers agitating for another vote to make it happen (or indeed if the vote is really close - most commentators seem to think Cameron needs at least a 7.5% win to hold his place). I wonder how long the EU will put up with continuous referenda before saying they've had enough and applying the boot themselves? From their point of view the turmoil and uncertainty we're causing can't be very satisfactory.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why has another thread been started?



Maybe because the thread voting to remain is biased towards remaining whilst this one hopefully counterbalances it ...


Just a theory mind..

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Maybe the government could ignore the result of this referendum. Are referendums legally binding

> in the constitution.


This referendum has no legal power at all. The only was to trigger Brexit is via an act of Parliament. There is an expectation that Parliament will follow the will of the referendum, though.

A majority vote to leave would have to be endorsed by a vote in Parliament, so not automatic.


An obvious point that is not coming up is how useless our own Government is - perhaps a REALLY radical solution to our problems with EU would be to solve our problems at home first.

I've spoken to two senior people in the financial world who honestly believe that the UK won't leave the EU with a leave vote. That instead the two years will be used to negotiate concessions.


I really hope that's not the case as it would be a huge blow for democracy. I am in favor of Remain but I am also in favor of democracy.


Apparently in Cameron's speech he said this decision is irreversible, whatever it is.

Oh, thanks for the clarification. He is right of course. Various EU leaders have publicly come out and said as much which is why the Leave Campaign has shifted to talking about trading with the EU under WTO rules. Of course that would be a much worse trading position for the UK but as least that's realistic. The UK would need to establish its own membership terms in the WTO but that's possible within the 2 year time frame for finalizing Brexit.

If we Leave and it goes Tits up .. It will be down to us..


If we Stay and it goes Tits up .. It will be out of our control..



People talk about people leaving The U.K. to live in Europe.. And Europeans coming to live here..


Well poor UK. citizens do not go and live in Europe.. France. Belgium. Italy. Germany..


Poor Europeans come to live and work in The U.K. because wages are 3-4 times higher

and many send money home to support their families..


There is a huge housing shortage in the U.K. and those who embrace mass migration should perhaps

open their doors and house 2-3 migrants in their spare rooms.


This would be a genuine gesture of their intent to stay and help out..

DulwichFox

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well poor UK. citizens do not go and live in Europe.. France. Belgium. Italy. Germany..


Maybe, but I reckon we export more unproductive people - how many retired people head to Europe? Apparently there are over half a million in Spain alone.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Well poor UK. citizens do not go and live in

> Europe.. France. Belgium. Italy. Germany..

>

> Maybe, but I reckon we export more unproductive

> people - how many retired people head to Europe?

> Apparently there are over half a million in Spain

> alone.


Well .. I would of thought they have done their bit for this country in their time..

Let them enjoy the Sun in their final years..


Foxy

Yep, the immigrants (rich or poor) who come here come here to work. They are young, of working age and with very high levels of employment and pay lots of tax.


If the population drops following Brexit who on earth do you think is going to fund the massive welfare state costs of the NHS and retirees? Without immigration of young people to Britain, the UK would be in a demographic downward spiral with significantly larger funding gaps for public services and the state pension.


Anyhow, that is why immigration won't be curtailed even after Brexit. The immigration the UK can control (i.e. non-EU) is higher than EU immigration anyhow. The country obviously needs to let in the people who are coming.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • was the price not displayed on the menu?
    • It has come to this author’s attention that the world of 4+ admissions — that most enigmatic of educational rites — continues to bewilder even the most composed of parents. Fear not. For in a former life, I was not merely a humble observer, but a seasoned educator of over twenty years, and Head of Pre-Prep for a distinguished dozen. Now, with quill exchanged for touchscreen, I have taken to that most modern of salons — Instagram — to dispense guidance, answer frequently whispered questions, and illuminate the shadowy corners of school selection with clarity and calm. Each post bears my signature twist: a blend of insight, levity, and the occasional raised eyebrow. Should you find yourself adrift in the sea of admissions, I suggest you peruse my latest dispatch. It may well be the lifeline you seek. The Delicate Dilemma of the Summer-born 4+ Scholars Yours in solidarity and scholastic savvy, Lord Pencilton  🎩✏️
    • Perhaps Gooseygreeny was not familiar with the wildlife before Gala was imposed on the park, since when its value to wildlife has deteriorated. The Park had never been disturbed before, as the council had respected it as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation, so only the Common was licensed by them as a site for events. The first time Gala held their event, there was a tree with woodpeckers nesting in it right in the middle of the main field they used and thrushes, blackbirds and great tits nesting within the shrubs and trees immediately surrounding the field. The woodpeckers were thriving on ants from the anthills in the grass. To those of us who used to enjoy watching the wildlife, it was very obviously a Site of Importance for a variety of birds. Despite being accessed by the public and their dogs, it had been relatively undisturbed,  which was one of the main reasons why it was so special and why I have been opposed to the Gala festival being held during the bird nesting season.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...