Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Oh dear. A quick totting up looks like Southwark has indeed gone to Labour control. A bit of a disaster, really. Shows that the age-old tactic of buying votes from the middle classes still works.


I had hoped it would stay roughly the same. I'm a big fan of NOC councils. Keeps some of the more loony policies and ideas out. Still, one redeeming point is it seems that James Barber has kept his seat.


The thought on the Beeb is that council results will be particularly open to challenge due to the voting shambles. Anyone know if Southwark polling stations suffered?

looking at the constituency maps it looks like the most desirable places to live in London (Fulham, Hampstead, barnet, beckenham, bromley, Richmond park-can only dream!) are conservative constituencies. Yes nice large houses and apartments but also great state schools, well kept green spaces, leisure facilities etc...I would be interested to know whether the unemployed and socially disadvantaged in these conservative constituencies fare better or worse (or the same) than equivalent people in labour (the socialists) constituencies in terms of equitable access to healthcare, benefits, decent housing, access to good schools. In this area the access isn't equitable and wealthier generally have access to better services.it may be the same in those constituencies but i was just wondering whether it was so.....


although i guess that there are a greater proportion of wealthy people in these conservative constituencies than in islington, dulwich, greenwich, camberwell etc how will we ever know what is possible in dulwich/w norwood if we stick with labour forever!


is it the people that make the area or the council ?


i hope ED stays under lib dem (please don't let labour take over and destroy us)

@bil some of the things you mention are completely outside local authority capacity so perhaps keeping the focus on what can be influenced at local level is a better way to look at things. Create a relationship with your local councillor (whatever colour) and try influence from the grassroots things that are important on a local level.

According to their manifesto the southwark labour group are promising free school meals for all primary school children as well as guaranteeing a school place in a local school.


Seems extraordinary...


That would save me approx ?750 a year (current annual cost of school lunches for 2 kids at primary school)... I'm assuming that council tax will go up under labout but by that much...???

Full results for ED:


Electorate: 8948


Ballot Papers Issued: 6343


Turnout: 70.9 %

Candidate's Name Party Votes Elected?

Leslie Henry, commonly known as Les, Alden Labour Party [The] 2061 No

James Barber Liberal Democrats 2854 Yes

Louise Margaret Dalton Conservative Party 871 No

Christopher Michael Fish Conservative Party 920 No

Anna Charlotte Goodman Green Party [The] 718 No

Oliver James Kempton Labour Party [The] 1907 No

Derek Charles Kinrade Green Party [The] 436 No

Jonathan Stuart Mitchell Liberal Democrats 2720 Yes

Joan, commonly known as Joani, Reid Labour Party [The] 1952 No

Janet Sam-King Conservative Party 779 No

Rosamund Joy, commonly known as Rosie, Shimell Liberal Democrats 2435 Yes

Lucy Trinder Green Party [The] 572 No


Duly Elected


* James Barber (Liberal Democrats)

* Jonathan Stuart Mitchell (Liberal Democrats)

* Rosamund Joy, commonly known as Rosie, Shimell (Liberal Democrats)

Townleygreen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If dc's figures are right (see above) then that means Labour has a majority of 4 in the council.


Sorry Townleygreen, I am afraid you misunderstood. The extra Labour Councillor in Chaucer takes Labour to 35, LD to 25 and T to 3 - an overall majority of 7 for Labour.

Good news.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I would like to understand this promise by the Greens in greater detail and how it applies locally? Presumably road/pavement upkeep and renewal is as important for cyclists and pedestrians as motorists? I am not aware of plans to build new roads locally but there has been plenty of money spent on converting roads into pedestrian only areas. On the face of it this feels a slightly empty statement, when applied at local level. I'd love to know the Greens stance in hiring out parks for private use (given impact on park environment), I'd also like to understand their stance on fireworks- I will look to see if I can find anything. I don't know if a manifesto exists under the documents section of Southwark Greens, but you can only access that bit by signing in- which is disappointing. If anyone has a manifesto that reflects local priorities- could they post a link?
    • You are most likely correct in thinking that  Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew it.  But they obviously thought that his skills, abilities and usefulness far outweighed the negatives. Here is a summary of the positives lifted from elsewhere:-   1. Strategic Architect: He was a primary architect of "New Labour," rebranding the party and shifting its core ideology to win the 1997 general election. 2 Master of Communication: Often called the original "spin doctor," he revolutionised how political parties manage the media. He famously created the "grid" system to coordinate government messaging. 3 Networking and Charm: Known as "Silvertongue," he possesses a peerless ability to charm and network with high-level global figures, including business leaders and heads of state. 4. Governance and Trade Expertise: Beyond strategy, he was considered a highly efficient minister, serving as European Commissioner for Trade and Secretary of State across multiple departments, including Business and Northern Ireland.  5. Reinvention: His capacity to adapt to changing political climates and rebuild relationships reflects personal resilience and strategic flexibility. With his skill and abilities, he delivered results for all his bosses. In the short time in Washington, he found a way to get on the right side of Trump - despite him  being critical of Trump in previous years. That said he is complex personality.  He can be simultaneously brilliant and arrogant, thick-skinned yet sensitive, and selfless for his party while appearing narcissistic in his personal dealings.  My OP asked if he would be accepted over the pond. It turned out he was because he got on famously with trump. He worked out the correct strategy to get on the good side of Trump and secured a better trade deal than the EU and other nations.    
    • Malumbu, do you happen to know what the current figure is for "trips into town made by walking, cycling and public transport"? 
    • Before voting, do you not think it's logical to evaluate each party on its policies and make a tally of the reasons "For" and "Against" voting for each party.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...