Jump to content

Recommended Posts

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Leering: look or gaze in a lascivious or unpleasant way.


Which is not the aggressive "following people down the street and yelling at them" you tried to argue.


> I think it is relevant to point out that displaying certain types of behaviour can lead into others


I think you are heading back to the 'all men are potential rapists' argument again. It's like that horrible 'male gaze' crap attitude from the 70's and 80's (and, sadly, beyond).

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Gawd, when does the bloody teachers' strike end?



Sorry, former teacher, no such luck. Funny that earlier today you accused me of stalking your comments and you've deliberately come back not to make a point but just to toss in an insult at me!

Beneath all the righteousness, though, there's an important parallel with the referendum topic: once you open the door to sexist, objectifying comments and tell women who - perhaps for reasons they don't want to share on the forum -feel uncomfortable, that it's just banter they have to accept, not only do those women feel bullied, the what's ok / what's not ok threshold moves to the next level and the thing escalates. As in this thread, in fact.


One of the things I hate most about working in a large corporate environment is that a lot of what used to be overt is covered up that way.

*Bob* back in the day we could keep lame threads going for 6/7 pages, without drawing breath. You of all people should never underestimate the power of a ridiculous and overrated thread to spill over into personal arguments, petty squabbling and embarrassingly entertaining drivel.


So, on that note, when is our next cyber battle due to commence? I reckon we could top this thread length with a much less controversial topic. What do you reckon?


Louisa.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So, on that note, when is our next cyber battle

> due to commence? I reckon we could top this thread

> length with a much less controversial topic. What

> do you reckon?


Can you do next Thursday?


I'll say something about focaccia and we can take it from there.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What doesn't make sense about them? Because you

> disagree with her doesn't mean her comments make

> no sense, they seem pretty straight forward.



Otta : in the first place I did not know KK was female. Secondly, I did not say I disagreed. This was self evident as I did say that KK's 7.11am post made no sense - to me. Then skipped off to work and thought no more about it. So was not ignoring you, but oblivious to your question.

aerie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> > What doesn't make sense about them? Because you disagree with her doesn't mean her comments make

> > no sense, they seem pretty straight forward.

>

>

> Otta : in the first place I did not know KK was female.


Erm... so what?


> Secondly, I did not say I disagreed. This was self evident as I did say that KK's 7.11am

> post made no sense - to me. Then skipped off to work and thought no more about it. So was not

> ignoring you, but oblivious to your question.


Actually, you called them 'disagreeable comments'. You say they are disagreeable, but you don't disagree with them? Yeah, right.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > So, on that note, when is our next cyber battle

> > due to commence? I reckon we could top this

> thread

> > length with a much less controversial topic.

> What

> > do you reckon?

>

> Can you do next Thursday?

>

> I'll say something about focaccia and we can take

> it from there.


focaccia? glorified garlic bread much favoured by the ros? quaffing chattering classes.

  • 4 weeks later...

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> aerie Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Otta Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > > What doesn't make sense about them? Because

> you disagree with her doesn't mean her comments

> make

> > > no sense, they seem pretty straight forward.

> >

> >

> > Otta : in the first place I did not know KK was

> female.

>

> Erm... so what?

>

> > Secondly, I did not say I disagreed. This was

> self evident as I did say that KK's 7.11am

> > post made no sense - to me. Then skipped off to

> work and thought no more about it. So was not

> > ignoring you, but oblivious to your question.

>

> Actually, you called them 'disagreeable comments'.

> You say they are disagreeable, but you don't

> disagree with them? Yeah, right.



hello Loz : I found this 2 seconds ago. what is your problem with me? What does yeah, right mean? does that mean you have the high ground? you sound like Dionne Bromfield and about the same age. Was this irony? I looked up Yeah Right, the Cambridge Dictionary describes it as : 'used when you don't believe what someone has said'

Perhaps you could now look up 'disagreeable' and its many synonyms and realise that disagreeable and not agreeing do not correspond.

I cannot fathom your hostility, self righteousness and pure aggression toward me and my feelings and opinions : its baffling.

However I will not be disconcerted, but where I come from, posts like yours elicit the wisdom 'you are just showing yourself up' in happy, perceptive scouse accent.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...