Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The park is very close to the Maudsley ,so I guess this may have been someone with mental health issues ,or substance abuse .

I love the paddling pool in this park ,but otherwise just find it incredibly depressing .

Though handy to take inpatients at Kings for some fresh( ish ) air .

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/11982-ruskin-park/#findComment-335902
Share on other sites

Herne Hill Guest Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ruskin Park is beautiful.


I agree...some lovely mature trees...full of squirrels (including an albino)...


And Quids, I haven't seen anyone crapping in a public park either...but then I've had a sheltered life...

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/11982-ruskin-park/#findComment-335986
Share on other sites

citizenED Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ruskin Park. Been once with my little ones. A once

> only experience.


really? Wow. I love Ruskin Park. Much better playground than anything I've found in ED, and the paddling pool is top. Besides, sometimes you get to meet the Quidses there.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/11982-ruskin-park/#findComment-336133
Share on other sites

Given the public funding cut backs it could be that there will be alot more public poo-age required.


Although pooing on the footpath is a bit rum. Having a dump on one of the flower borders would have been less unsightly and would have provided nutrients to the plants.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/11982-ruskin-park/#findComment-336135
Share on other sites

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> citizenED Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Ruskin Park. Been once with my little ones. A

> once

> > only experience.

>

> really? Wow. I love Ruskin Park.


we like it too, may be the new goose green will be better (if and when they manage to finish it) but the playground certainly beats e.g. dulwich park or peckham rye in the eyes of my children

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/11982-ruskin-park/#findComment-336141
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Considering the private revision study that my children undertook, perhaps 15 to 20 years ago in that library it seems a shame they have timed the refurbishment so it won't be open at this crucial time for children. But hey, so long as it's greener... 
    • Enforcement costs money which I doubt the fines actually pay for. Presumably it hasn't been a priority. 
    • Details here: https://www.southwark.gov.uk/2025/dulwich-library-closing-refurbishment
    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...