Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Derby 1 Nottm Forest 0

Chelsea 3 Ipswich 0

Doncaster 0 Aston Villa 3

Hartlepool 0 West Ham 8

Hull 2 Millwall 1

Kettering 0 Fulham 3

Man Utd Res 3 Tottenham Res 1

Portsmouth 2 Swansea 1

Sheff Utd 3 Charlton 0

Sunderland 2 Blackburn 2

Torquay 1 Coventry 1

Watford 1 Crystal Palace 2

West Brom 2 Burnley 2

Wolverhampton 1 Middlesbrough 0

A little bit of stuff from me (not much)


S**thampton are on the verge now of administratioin due to Barclays forcibly restructuring overdraft arrangements. Dates of 2nd Feb and 16th March have been mentioned to me, but with a break even gate target of 22k it will not be long. Woopert Lowe is just trying to judge whether they should take the ten point hit this season or next (i.e. is relagation a certainty?)


Now many may think I find this funny, but I am saddened by the financial plight of any football team, especially, in the case of S**thampton, one that for years was run so financially well. Just shows the dangers (imo) of appointing Harry Redknapp as manager (of course, relegation was in no way his fault - it was all the players doing!).


Oh and I am to have an evening with the FA Cup on 6th Feb as a guest of PFC! Quite looking forward to it really!

Derby 2 Nottm Forest 1

Chelsea 1 Ipswich 2

Doncaster 1 Aston Villa 2

Hartlepool 1 West Ham 2

Hull 2 Millwall 1

Kettering 0 Fulham 2

Man Utd 3 Tottenham 0

Portsmouth 2 Swansea 1

Sheff Utd 2 Charlton 0

Sunderland 2 Blackburn 1

Torquay 1 Coventry 2

Watford 2 Crystal Palace 1

West Brom 2 Burnley 1

Wolverhampton 2 Middlesbrough 1


Cardiff 1 Arsenal 3

Liverpool 2 Everton 1

Derby 2 Nottm Forest 0

Chelsea 2 Ipswich 0

Doncaster 1 Aston Villa 3

Hartlepool 1 West Ham 1

Hull 2 Millwall 0

Kettering 0 Fulham 2

Man Utd 2 Tottenham 0

Portsmouth 1 Swansea 1

Sheff Utd 1 Charlton 1

Sunderland 2 Blackburn 1

Torquay 1 Coventry 2

Watford 0 Crystal Palace 2

West Brom 2 Burnley 0

Wolverhampton 0 Middlesbrough 0

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Celtic move ahead again as Rangers slip up. Good

> day.


I can't remember which Scottish team you support Mick but another good weekend for the Dons.


Ronaldo is a selfish git. I expect he had somewhere to be. Still, we won, let's see what the Toffeemen can do tomorrow.

ITV Sport are a disgrace with their camera work for the Portsmouth v Swansea FA Cup game. They had all their cameras no higher than 10 rows back from touchline and not even coveromg near side of pitch. I thought it was a nailed on Swansea win and the kind of potential 'shock' to show the nation - but clearly ITV thought a Tony Adams Pompey team in freefall would have no problem against maybe the best footballing side in the Championship. Sort of sums up their panel of "expert" pundits.


Wow, and ITV appear to be rehabilitating their disgraced former commentator Big Ron, in the crowd at Fulham game, by focusing in on him and referring to him as a member of the glitterati!


Off to Anfield tomorrow morning, but intend watching Cardiff v Arsenal beforehand which I think is going to be another Cup 'shock'.

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Celtic move ahead again as Rangers slip up.

> Good

> > day.

>

> I can't remember which Scottish team you support

> Mick but another good weekend for the Dons.



Sandperson - I think the clue is in the "Good Day" bit of my post. Although I have a financial interest in MU this year, so as far as south of the border goes, I'm with you this season.

Can't quite believe Bill Hill gave me 10/3 on MU in mid November.

Matthew123, here you go, this explains Ronaldo's behaviour:


Cristiano Ronaldo was withdrawn after 71 minutes against Spurs and after the game Ferguson admitted the Portuguese winger was a doubt prior to the match.


"We had to get the doctor in to see Cristiano," said the Scot.


"He had a bit of a bug and I think it showed today, I don't think he was anywhere near ready.


"But he showed the appetite to play and it's always good to have him on the pitch, opponents are always aware of him. He should be better by Tuesday."


From the BBC website. He had the trots then. :-$

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
    • Very sorry to hear this, but surely the landlord is responsible for fixing the electrics?  Surely they must be insured for things like this? I hope you get it all sorted out quickly.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...