Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What a shame such a perfect couple. I hope the

> kids don't suffer. They've both done a lot for the

> world of showbiz and we should be proud of their

> contribution as a couple.

>

> Louisa.


Lost in showbiz post of the week.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/123953-brangelina/#findComment-1049988
Share on other sites

The media sword cuts both ways, that's how it goes. You can't turn it off.


That said - as 'showbiz couples' go - in a world where 'having a certain shaped arse' or 'wearing a dress' is enough to generate a double page spread most weeks - their work is a good deal more admirable than most.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/123953-brangelina/#findComment-1050017
Share on other sites

So now these two fine looking people are available to date at last, what are the next best power couple combinames they should go for?


Bradley - you could do worse than Brandi. (I have no idea if Andi Peters is currently unattached, but give it a go!)


Angie - honey, you should totally go for the triple: ChAngeLiam. Now that Liam 1D and Cheryl Tweedy-Cole-Ferrero-Rocher are rumoured to be expecting, it's the perfect time to step into a m?nage ? trois vedettes. Everyone wins: you love babies; they haven't got their own power couple name yet. Oh they are both in other power couple names at the moment though, courtesy of highly improbable internet conspiracy theories, so be prepared for some Twitter abuse from the 'Chim' and 'Larry' shippers!


xx

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/123953-brangelina/#findComment-1050419
Share on other sites

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's absurd.

>

> Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > well, they haven't been in the news much for

> > anything else recently - can't help thinking

> they

> > need attention.


I think JAB's sarcastically referring to The Archers rather than Brangelina.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/123953-brangelina/#findComment-1050532
Share on other sites

Lisa Taylor Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Heellloooo Brad

> I'm Lisa


Blisa? Brisa? Lad?? Sorry, it's just not going to work out.


Most eligible EDF member by name is probably Seabrad.


Not tempted by Angelisa? Or are you graciously leaving the field open for Angelouisa?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/123953-brangelina/#findComment-1050545
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...