Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What a shame such a perfect couple. I hope the

> kids don't suffer. They've both done a lot for the

> world of showbiz and we should be proud of their

> contribution as a couple.

>

> Louisa.


Lost in showbiz post of the week.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/123953-brangelina/#findComment-1049988
Share on other sites

The media sword cuts both ways, that's how it goes. You can't turn it off.


That said - as 'showbiz couples' go - in a world where 'having a certain shaped arse' or 'wearing a dress' is enough to generate a double page spread most weeks - their work is a good deal more admirable than most.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/123953-brangelina/#findComment-1050017
Share on other sites

So now these two fine looking people are available to date at last, what are the next best power couple combinames they should go for?


Bradley - you could do worse than Brandi. (I have no idea if Andi Peters is currently unattached, but give it a go!)


Angie - honey, you should totally go for the triple: ChAngeLiam. Now that Liam 1D and Cheryl Tweedy-Cole-Ferrero-Rocher are rumoured to be expecting, it's the perfect time to step into a m?nage ? trois vedettes. Everyone wins: you love babies; they haven't got their own power couple name yet. Oh they are both in other power couple names at the moment though, courtesy of highly improbable internet conspiracy theories, so be prepared for some Twitter abuse from the 'Chim' and 'Larry' shippers!


xx

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/123953-brangelina/#findComment-1050419
Share on other sites

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's absurd.

>

> Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > well, they haven't been in the news much for

> > anything else recently - can't help thinking

> they

> > need attention.


I think JAB's sarcastically referring to The Archers rather than Brangelina.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/123953-brangelina/#findComment-1050532
Share on other sites

Lisa Taylor Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Heellloooo Brad

> I'm Lisa


Blisa? Brisa? Lad?? Sorry, it's just not going to work out.


Most eligible EDF member by name is probably Seabrad.


Not tempted by Angelisa? Or are you graciously leaving the field open for Angelouisa?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/123953-brangelina/#findComment-1050545
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
    • Totally agree with you.  🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    • It took the Tories 14 years to dig that 20bn blackhole. It's taken Labour 14 months to double it.  You cant get rid of Reeves though because the next person will actually be totally incompetent. There are no MPs in Labour capable of performing better than the current shower.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...