Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It is quite clear that Keef is by far and away THE most popular forumite. Any sign of dissent stimulates the forum to immediate coordinated acts of defence. Any debate about Keef promotes a fountain of positive energy.


So, having been watching alot of TV about India and Hindus of late; I propose that we promote Keef to the pantheon of Gods and worship him.


The CPT could become the Temple of Keef.

Fear n' Loathing could become his Head Priest and I suggest Bagpuss as Hand-Maiden in Chief (THIS is what you have being saving yourself for Bagpuss). Barry Road and other CPT regulars could take on ceremonial positions.


Our holy day could be the first Friday of every month when we meet to make offerings of libations and chant the holy mantra - "And yours is .....?".


I envisage effigies of THE BLESSED ONE, showing him with alot of arms - and in each hand he holds a pint-pot.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1240-keef-should-we-worship-him/
Share on other sites

Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> can Keef's heaven beat the FSM's heaven where

> there is a beer volcano and a stripper factory?

> Who cares? Let's just go to both where I'm sure

> there'll be a pool table and Man Utd will be in

> the Rymans League


You can count me in then. Should we worship with foaming pints at the CPT?

shaman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Has the village shaman I could arrange his rituals

> and feasts understand he is of good blood line,

> hey cousin oops!


Indeed cousin. I had been keeping that quiet since you told me, as thought you might want to remain anon... Don't worry, I shall keep your identity to myself ;-)

As I said, you have to match my salary :))


I think Keef's godly power should be along the lines of pointing at a pint of Grolsch, which then miraculously becomes a Grolsch top.


All these new appointments are going to make Candice's job a lot easier. Maybe we should put her in charge of the holy ladder that leads from Sydenham to the CPT?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...