Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just found this on the planning portal. The existing newsagent at 100 Lordship Lane, 'ED Local', looks like it will be sharing the space with a branch of Subway aka 'eat fresh'. Guessing it will be a franchise? What does everyone think? Welcome addition? Will be handy if it's open late for the post night life crowd wanting a snack on the way home.


http://planbuild.southwark.gov.uk:8190/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=_STHWR_DCAPR_9568891


http://planbuild.southwark.gov.uk/documents/?GetDocument=%7b%7b%7b!ux9H2xq98bHbAjZyYwj63Q%3d%3d!%7d%7d%7d


Louisa.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/124945-subway-coming-to-lordship-lane/
Share on other sites

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's borderline junk food, but am not averse to

> the occasional Subway as a bit of a guilty

> pleasure.


I'd leave out the "borderline" :)


And damn, I too thought we were getting a subway under the road! Maybe at that nasty junction opposite The Bishop,!

Can't say the thought excites me but ED, like a lot of gentrified London, has become a place of two parallel lifestyles and there are plenty of people who will probably find it more to their liking and their pocket than W Rose, Moxon's or Franklins.
Their bread is rubbish- they must have employed someone to investigate how much air you can pump into bread before it collapses....also- what is that horrible sour smell in their shops...I have been in several with other people and they all smell weird?

DulwichBorn&Bred Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I can't see it succeeding personally given all the other tastier

> places to eat on the lane with our cafes and bakeries


I think you're kind of missing the point. It's not competing with Boulangerie Jade or Brick House... it's more of an alternative to fried chicken or a kebab.

kford Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It'll be an alternative to Co-op or M&S sarnies at

> lunchtime, for anyone working in the offices on

> the lane.


Everything on the menu is 'reformed meat'.


You'd do far better getting a lamb or chicken wrap from Kebab and Wine, or felafel, for a similar price.

ontheedge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Remember reading subway food is on one of the

> worst type of foods to eat lists, ranks way lower

> than McDonalds, but tries to dress it self up in

> something healthy!


The 12" meatball marinara contains more salt than the recommended daily total for an adult, 42 grams of fat (18g saturated, almost 100% RDA for adult women) and over 1000 calories. Never eaten anything from them myself but friends who have tell me it's actually pretty revolting too!

They might not have very healthy components to their offering, but I reckon almost all local food options - including the new MEATLiqour and Franco Manca, are not exactly 'healthy', cheese, fatty meats, bread bases. When you're on a budget something like Subway is a good addition compared to fried chicken and greasy kebabs, the other local budget options. At least it contains salad.


Louisa.

Lowlander Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You'd do far better getting a lamb or chicken wrap

> from Kebab and Wine, or felafel, for a similar

> price.


A shish, potentially. But not a doner, no way. K&W don't do falafel.


ontheedge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Remember reading subway food is on one of the

> worst type of foods to eat lists, ranks way lower

> than McDonalds


source?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • No they aren't. You're coming across as a smug, superior liberal, and that's what old fashioned voters (labour, Cons and now Reform) hate. That 'the deplorables' 'they're all ignorant racists' line is what's driving people away from the traditional parties and towards Reform.  You're as guilty of looking back as Labour. This is a new, post-europe world and we all need to come to terms with that, make do with what we have, and move forward.       
    • I have sympathy with any voter, anyone, who having witnessed the last 14 years and then Labour in the last year and wonders just how can things be this bad  unless a) they voted for brexit b) voted Tory after 2010 c) is thinking of voting reform  because anyone who thinks reform won’t make things a thousand times worse after voting for the previous?  It is they who are the problem.  They are the reason the country is in the doldrums with an embarrassingly-timid Labour government  Specifically Chris mason - a not very bright right leaning stooge - large part of why bbc news has become grok-level slop  
    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...