Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ay tis.

?7 entry. Cheap beer at the bar, where you can now finish your half time pint at your own pace looking down out the windows, pretending you're in the corporate box (when it's really really cold, it's difficult to leave).

Comedy football with outbursts of quality.

Usually get some handbags too.

Occasionally surreal scenes like the time half the pitch was off limits due to a particularly territorial Canadian Goose.

All the fun of the fair really.


First home game is the 21st I think.

there's a thread about it here from last season. The first game I went to saw three red cards and a knock out, another one the Hamlets were 3-0 down and came back to win 4-3 in a last minute clincher and in another the linesman was stretchered off. I believe they're having to start with a fresh new squad this season as last year's manager Wayne "Oi Ref! Oi Ref! Oi Ref! Fu*k off" Barnet has taken last season's squad with him to Fischer Athletic.


So yes, a good day out.

I haven't been to see them since I was a kid but if anyone on here fancies meeting up one Saturday to watch a match there and support our local team I'd certainly give it some consideration. Mind you the colour and style of their kit is a lot to be desired.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fisher are originally a Bermondsey club. Dulwich

> Hamlet is a Dulwich club, you live in Dulwich

> don't you, s'obvious innit.


The ground is actually in SE5. That's Camberwell.

Alan Dale Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Fisher are originally a Bermondsey club.

> Dulwich

> > Hamlet is a Dulwich club, you live in Dulwich

> > don't you, s'obvious innit.

>

> The ground is actually in SE5. That's Camberwell.


Sorry to be a pedant, but the postcode for the ground is SE22 8BD, so that makes it an East Dulwich club in my book.


They played pretty well on Tuesday given it's almost an entirely new team - they should have scored more.


Next match at Champion Hill is on Saturday at 3.00 v. Worthing

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, I will be vigilant
    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...