Jump to content

Gay lib outside the charity shop (contains rudeness)


Recommended Posts

This is very exciting - I have never seen a thread on here that states 'contains rudeness' - i was drawn to it instantly!


Maybe there should be a new x-rated section??


Going back to the original post, as a gayer I always applaud PDAs from other gayers - not sure I'd have the guts myself on Lordship Lane - though I did snog my (then) bloke in Liquorish last year and no-one batted an eyelid

I love the fact this thread is top of the list - only beaten by "Tell us what you think about this forum". I would love to know if there are any newcomers this week - talk about first impressions! If there's a big turnout at the birthday party I think we can put its success down to this thread.


Mmmm, and yes, I am a middle class big brother watcher - ooooh, I feel so dirty saying that....

James Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Charlie you sound hilarious. Do you go to the

> rainbow drinks at the Rye?


Thanks James. I'm too busy sniffing round Old Street and Soho, whenever the wife lets me. I would be tempted by a touch of the rainbow at the Rye but if I come, I'm just visiting.


Charlie

And talking of BB I'm just switching on C4+1 for the eviction.

Tracey: http://www.nyanko.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/chamb/images/cfenellaintro.jpg

Tracey: http://www.bbc.co.uk/comedy/guide/images/400/anyoneforpennis_1.jpg

Tracey: http://www.ncsl.org.uk/media/361/F2/worzel-gummidge.jpg


Must go tonight!

You filthy articles!


I have been working hard all week, never touching the internet for fear of being issued with my P45. This morning the sun was up, I trip down the stairs and log on to see what my chums have been talking about, and here you all are...


How very shameful of you! I shall tell Fr O'Connor on the lot of you with your Biffins Bridge and your seagul/munging/feltching type discussions. I have noted the names, and shall slap your legs - the lot of you, on the next forum night out. Necrophilia? In the name of God, are the dead are not even safe in East Dulwich now? It is a slippery slope...


If it is not Michael and his lactation/nipple fixation - you will be organising midnight trips to the graveyard on Wood Vale next with pink fluffy handcuffs!

OHMYGOD!


Actually, I have just looked up munging - Mr Mockney Piers, and I am sending the police over to your house right now. The public should be protected from the likes of you.


FILTH!


I can't get that image out of my head now. I am going to lie down. I have just decided that I definitely want to be cremated.

Oh yes Mr Mockney Piers, hide behind your innocent explanations now! Ironic is it? I have Fr O'Connor on speed dial... Your plans for a Roman Catholic wedding are in shreds can I assure you, you can consider yourself not even welcome at a Roman Catholic Funeral for your clearly animalistic tendencies! The dead are not even safe in their coffins!

mikese22 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Going back to the original post, as a gayer I

> always applaud PDAs from other gayers - not sure

> I'd have the guts myself on Lordship Lane - though

> I did snog my (then) bloke in Liquorish last year

> and no-one batted an eyelid



MikeSE22 - you also snogged me against the bar in Liquorish. Now tell me what is more unusual - two gay guys kissing in a bar in SE22, or a gay guy kissing a (then) lesbian girl in the same bar?


I am too scared to look up 'munging' or any of the other words. Are there pictures as well? Actually, I don't think I want to know...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These statements were in the Consultation Findings report published (later than promised) just before the licence was granted:  "The site hire fee goes directly to supporting the delivery of the council’s Events service, which supports the delivery of up to 100 free-to-attend community events per year – please refer to section 1 (Licensing and income)" I've drafted an email to request some more details of these "free-to-attend" events, as "up to" is a fairly meaningless description - could be 100, could be none? - and therefore doesn't help anyone to decide whether it is actually a benefit to the community or not. Even if it is 100, I'm not sure I could name even one of them? "The site hire fee goes directly to supporting the provision of a grants fund – the Cultural Celebrations programme - please refer to section 1 (Licensing and income)" A similarly meaningless statement in terms of gauging whether, or how much, this is a benefit to the local community. What is it, what does it do, how much of the fee goes to it? And how can the fee go "directly" to two different things? Surely, "directly" means without deviation, straight to, without being changed or reduced?? Again, I'll be asking all these questions to the events dept. I find it outrageous & insulting that a public body can try to justify such an intrusive & disruptive event with such flimsy and opaque "benefits", with zero figures or details to quantify them. They may as well not bother with a consultation, just say "Look, we can't be arsed to justify our decision, it's happening so just deal with it".  
    • Thanks so much. Yes I have. Really appreciate your kindness in replying. Thank you.
    • Have you posted on Nextdoor? There's a big cat community on there. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...