Jump to content

Recommended Posts

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LOL....well we can only respond to what people

> write!


zzzzzzzzzzzzzz

>

> And I think the final conclusion must be that it's

> horses for courses.....and everyone is happy!


zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz, JHC (poor Admin, is all I can think)

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Class is an outdated load of w@nk.


I agree with Keef completely. Although he knows I do.


As an outsider who has nevertheless been close to and associated with poms all my life and lived here for nigh on a decade I can honestly say that your adherence to outdated and sometimes mean spirited ideas of class is something that lets you down as an otherwise pleasant enough nation. This goes for both sides of the spectrum.


I do have to caveat that though by saying that for the economically excluded, of which there is a significant population in Britain, the idea of belonging to a class is possibly all they have.


I couldn?t give a dam about Winterbottoms mind you.

skidmarks Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Harvester is part of Mitchells & Butler PLC

> current share price 308.30p. The group also owns

> All Bar one and Browns and lot lots more.



The Plough

The Crown & Greyhound

White Horse (Crystal Palace)

Railway (Blackheath)


To name a few.

cate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue,

> Ellipsis - apostrophe - what?


xxxxx


You were having a go at Woof about his punctuation - specifically, you said he was using too many apostrophes. I believe you had actually counted them, and said there were nine.


Not sure why this was an issue for you, but I just wanted to point out, in an equally pedantic way, that an apostrophe is this: ' and I didn't see any of those in Woof's post.


However an ellipsis (which Woof was using perfectly correctly as far as I can see) is this: ...


Clearer?

candj Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue - Not to be more confusing, but I believe that

> Cate meant the apostrophes in It's was used

> incorrectly.

>

> Sooo sorry, off topic.


xxxxxx


He didn't do that nine times though :))


Unless she's been through all his posts :))

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> candj Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Sue - Not to be more confusing, but I believe

> that

> > Cate meant the apostrophes in It's was used

> > incorrectly.

> >

> > Sooo sorry, off topic.

>

> xxxxxx

>

> He didn't do that nine times though :))

>

> Unless she's been through all his posts :))


I counted 9 incorrect apostrophes in his post.


1 -It's offered beer is bland Stella/Fosters/Heineken/golden generic froth


2 -It's food is "ready meal" bland curry/pie/roast


3 -It's interiors are bland repro pine/antique brass/ stuff


4 -It's art is bland....


5 -It's carpets are naff


6 -It's bogs smell of nasty air freshners..


7 -It's service is bland..


8 -It's staff are bland....


9 -It's punters are......

peterstorm1985 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > candj Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Sue - Not to be more confusing, but I believe

> > that

> > > Cate meant the apostrophes in It's was used

> > > incorrectly.

> > >

> > > Sooo sorry, off topic.

> >

> > xxxxxx

> >

> > He didn't do that nine times though :))

> >

> > Unless she's been through all his posts :))

>

> I counted 9 incorrect apostrophes in his post.

>

> 1 -It's offered beer is bland

> Stella/Fosters/Heineken/golden generic froth

>

> 2 -It's food is "ready meal" bland curry/pie/roast

>

>

> 3 -It's interiors are bland repro pine/antique

> brass/ stuff

>

> 4 -It's art is bland....

>

> 5 -It's carpets are naff

>

> 6 -It's bogs smell of nasty air freshners..

>

> 7 -It's service is bland..

>

> 8 -It's staff are bland....

>

> 9 -It's punters are......



xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Oh yeh, you're right :-$:-$:-$


Oh well, maybe I won't apply for that job as a proofreader after all, then :))


Sorry Cate!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, I will be vigilant
    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...