Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This is of particular interest to me currently, elsewhere. It's not unheard on the forum for less than 100% genuine posts/threads to be written/created. Due to my experience of using this forum I tend to be suspicious of these as Admin has found several of this nature in the past. I don't particularly want to feel like the eejet who will believe anything that's been written and am now perhaps too cynical. Do you have a view on this subject?
Declan, were you bothered about it when that bloke with the Spurious science on Diabetes or whatever it was posted up a cut and paste of a standard sales spiels with links to his book/website...and claimed he'd "just moved into the area" here? Many on here defended his blatant sales pitch (let alone his rubbish), I can't remember where you were on this? I'm cynical but on the whole find them quite a laugh. I think there should be a gallery of the best.

I think Narnia is referring to 1st time posters who are recommending something... that often ends up being connected to the poster.


Yes, first-time poster recommending anything should be taken with a pinch of salt. In any case, if they've never posted on EDF before, how are you to judge whether their recommendations are worth anything at all? They could be the type of people who - God forbid - sell their story to the News of the World and eat nothing but Bounty bars. B)

I highly recommend katie1997 gardening services (saturdays only).


For a huge fee, paid in advance directly to my bank account, I will promise not to go anywhere near your precious plants, shrubs, flowers, wildlife pond and vegetable patch*.


I am new to the area and this is my first post but I doubt you will find a more attractive - and effective - deal elsewhere. Winter discount coming soon!!!





*for their continued good health

Ah...Ok...thanks Quids/louisiana.


In that case...if people are posting fibs in order to obtain some sort of advantage - then that cannot be right (IMO). However, in the case of some "trolls", although I could slap them one for potentially wasting my time and/or possibly making a fool out of me, I do find that some of the resulting threads turn out to be a real hoot. We've had a couple of late - I laughed and laughed...priceless!

(Hi Katie1997)... I've used Katie1997 for several Saturdays now and found her deal very attractive. She may be slightly more expensive than other non gardening services but her attractiveness makes it worth it. In fact I'm thinking of posting about her in the 'People I like thread'. I can't wait for Winter.

The best one had to be the window cleaner pretending to be a happy customer recommending his company. The OP had the username of said company...remember that one?


Of course as window cleaners go, he wasn't a pathc on Katie's gardening services!

On a serious note narnia, yes I agree that first time postings for recommendations can appear to be suspicious but ... am sure that this is not always the intention or the case.


Sometimes someone may have been so enthused by the product/services, that they may have wished to share this as an expression of goodwill towards that business and to help others.


Tbh, sometimes recommendations from 'established' posters can be taken with a pinch of salt too as we are all so diverse, what one of us considers to be excellent (eg. Sunday lunch/coffee etc) may be far removed from our own opinion.



I take your point Katie but I would be more interested in hearing from someone who has posted for a while. A first time poster who starts a thread to recommend someone may be enthused by a product/service but not having anything else to read from that poster you don't know if they are genuine or not.

Seriously though, I have used quite a few people recommended from here...and I only used them because they had received many a recommendation from many an established poster. Two that stand out are Alex (for oven repairs) and Ludoscotts (seamstress).


Katie is right though in that in some cases (e.g. best coffee), it is a matter of opinion...I mean, it's all a bit subjective.


Bye the way, I too can recommend Katie7993 (or was is Katie 7132) for her services...




(PS: Katie2839...never mind your services, I hope you are applying your make-up at the moment!);-)

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The best one had to be the window cleaner

> pretending to be a happy customer recommending his

> company. The OP had the username of said

> company...remember that one?

>

> Of course as window cleaners go, he wasn't a pathc

> on Katie's gardening services!


My fave was the one (last month) who (it turned out) sold their story to the News of the World and ate nothing but Bounty bars, selling childcare. I think most people missed it as it was all happening in the About this forum section. But while Admin challenged with all the facts at his fingertips and let the whole thing run (several days), it was a hoot.

I'm always immediately suspicious of any low count recommendations and have been known to google whois etc to see if domain name owners are anything like user names, and I'm not shy of letting admin know.


Having said that have you ever been asked to recommend a business by its owner? As such I try to avoid steaming in. If I was a small local business and had a happy customer I may well ask them to recommend me on here, and if that was a new user then it may well look suspicious. I might even let them use my computer to log in and create their account and now it's the same IP address so looks really dodgy. I might even make some suggestions as to what they should say and now it looks really really dodgy, even though they volunteered to recommend me.


I guess I'm saying suspicion is natural but accusations can be harsh.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That's the milquetoast triangulation that's delivered so much electoral success to the Lib Dems locally and nationally! 🤣
    • Amazing. Now could you cut and paste an AI summary of the defence case for Andrew M-W? 
    • I would like to understand this promise by the Greens in greater detail and how it applies locally? Presumably road/pavement upkeep and renewal is as important for cyclists and pedestrians as motorists? I am not aware of plans to build new roads locally but there has been plenty of money spent on converting roads into pedestrian only areas. On the face of it this feels a slightly empty statement, when applied at local level. I'd love to know the Greens stance in hiring out parks for private use (given impact on park environment), I'd also like to understand their stance on fireworks- I will look to see if I can find anything. I don't know if a manifesto exists under the documents section of Southwark Greens, but you can only access that bit by signing in- which is disappointing. If anyone has a manifesto that reflects local priorities- could they post a link?
    • You are most likely correct in thinking that  Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew it.  But they obviously thought that his skills, abilities and usefulness far outweighed the negatives. Here is a summary of the positives lifted from elsewhere:-   1. Strategic Architect: He was a primary architect of "New Labour," rebranding the party and shifting its core ideology to win the 1997 general election. 2 Master of Communication: Often called the original "spin doctor," he revolutionised how political parties manage the media. He famously created the "grid" system to coordinate government messaging. 3 Networking and Charm: Known as "Silvertongue," he possesses a peerless ability to charm and network with high-level global figures, including business leaders and heads of state. 4. Governance and Trade Expertise: Beyond strategy, he was considered a highly efficient minister, serving as European Commissioner for Trade and Secretary of State across multiple departments, including Business and Northern Ireland.  5. Reinvention: His capacity to adapt to changing political climates and rebuild relationships reflects personal resilience and strategic flexibility. With his skill and abilities, he delivered results for all his bosses. In the short time in Washington, he found a way to get on the right side of Trump - despite him  being critical of Trump in previous years. That said he is complex personality.  He can be simultaneously brilliant and arrogant, thick-skinned yet sensitive, and selfless for his party while appearing narcissistic in his personal dealings.  My OP asked if he would be accepted over the pond. It turned out he was because he got on famously with trump. He worked out the correct strategy to get on the good side of Trump and secured a better trade deal than the EU and other nations.    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...