Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ooooh I do hope so - I have fond memories of grabbing Bono outside the Barbican theatre (where he was involved in the soundtrack to Clockwork Orange), giving him a kiss and proclaiming my undying love as a teenager.


Sadly nowadays I am more likely to be found kissing the floor of the Gowlett!

Lovely Oglandia,


I would love to believe that this was true, but I doubt it. U2 have been popular in Ireland since the late 70's and became massive in Ireland in about 1980 when "Boy" was released. Bono did not don a cowboy hat for years after that - like 15 years after that. None of them had spots or were greasy haired at the time. Indeed Larry Mullins looked like a better looking version of James Dean! They were persued everywhere by young women...(sigh) when they played at the Dandelion Market (OHMYGOD). Not a single one of them had a spot. Indeed they were always simply gorgous. Then Bono behaved like a complete arse at Band Aid, and it has been down hill all the way ever since.


I can't imagine them being discovered by a London pub landlord 25 years ago!

I can assure dulwichmum that U2 were indeed playing the "lesser" venues of Britain back in the late 70s


The Gowlett may not still be a rock venue but the Hope and Anchor in Islington very much is and makes much ado about ealy U2 gigs. I think my first U2 was Cork City Hall in 82 ( I wasn;t much taken.. my love of U2 tends to be 93-97 era)

Whatever the facts may be about their performance history I am surprised to find myself at least agreeing with DM that they have gone downhill faster than a Formula One race car n a slippery slope with a huge tailwind. I think their deterioration probably coincided with the fact that they started to think that anyone gave a f**k about their opinions on anything other than music. U" are a sublime example of people who achieve success and a platform in one arena and then think they have the intelligent, knowledge and understanding to be informed commentators in completely different areas. The only thing more disturbing than that is the fact that considerable swathes of the public seem to be happy to allow them to do that and then worship at their feet like disciples at the feet of the master(s).


If U2 had stuck to music their place in the musical firmament would have been assured. Unfortunately, every time I even hear Bono or U2 mentioned nowadays I get a sense of irritation.

I am not going to disagree with anyone who does or doesn't like U2s music


But Domitianus I think you are wrong they went downhill the moment they thought anyone cared what they thought - have a look at some interviews from the very early days - all of the same opinions were in evidence (many of which I agreed with some I didn't )


Here's an interview from 1981 as evidence:


http://u2_interviews.tripod.com/id12.html


When U2 became this MASSIVE band then those opinions became more ubiquitous - but it had little bearing on their music

Lovely Sean, I am afraid that I can't open that link without something odd happening to my screen - but I agree, as soon as they thought people cared about their opinion, it all seemed to go downhill. I can still see Bono taking the microphone at Live Aid, OHMYGODNO!!!!
It could be true but one thing I do know is that they played the Half Moon in Herne Hill coz my mate was there and there was literally four men and a dog...er that would be Bonio of course, or The Pope as he likes to be known to the general public these days. On a personal level I saw them at the Marquee Club when they first started out around late '79 or early 1980 and they were brilliant. Can't bloody stand them now though.

As somone who remains a fan, I'd argue that U2 are one of the very few acts (perhaps the only major one) whose music hasn't become a sad parody of their former glory days. Most acts lose that essential ingredient, passion, but I reckon they still have it in spades. Go along to a U2 gig and you'll still get plenty of tunes from the latest and most recent albums that don't act as a signal for the audience to go buy the next round. Can't ever be said for the Rolling Stones, Who, Prince etc etc..

So Bono has a bit of a messianic complex and can occasionally get on your t*ts, big deal. Are there any half decent performers out there that don't? It's his job. If you've followed what he's been up to the last few years (with DATA, RED, ONE campaign etc) you'll see that far from being someone famous jumping on a planet saving bandwagon, he really knows his stuff. Sometimes more than the politicians and campaigners he works with. Just ask Jeffrey Sachs.

Plus, in the f*cked up world of rock n roll, not only have the same four schoolfriends kept together for thirty years, but he's also been married to his childhood sweetheart for 25. Gotta say something for the man.

As he says, celebrity is currency and I think he chooses to spend it wisely.

Personaly I think U2 have had a few absolutely great songs, and a load of sh!t ones. Bono is a gobshite. The Edge is pretty cool, but if he took his hat off he'd just look like a bald pikey.


Chris Martin of Coldplay is another one who thnks he is our moral gaurdian... He also thinks he's a lot brighter than he is... He also thinks that Bittersweet symphony is the best song ever written... Obviously a complete terd!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The coop of Forest Hill Road is very different- cheerful and helpful staff 
    • Would you expose your young people to 'that man'? That is apparently a real question. 'That man' is in fact a retired Oxford Professor of Moral & Pastoral Theology who wrote a book setting out to provide a moral reckoning on the vexed subject of Britain's Empire and its history. What might formerly have been a purely academic matter has become highly contentious, and according to one Cambridge academic "serious shit" that needed to be CLOSED DOWN. It's all rather amazing, the stuff of satire or nightmare but not of the real world. Anyway, Lord Biggar accepted an invitation to visit Peckham and speak to and with a small audience that was due to include young Black students ... who in the end didn't come on the day! Having set the whole thing up to facilitate this encounter for them, the outcome was a disappointment. The conversation with Lord Biggar and audience was not:   
    • Entertaining a visitor from Philippines, she's been here before but I've promised lunch.  Somewhere a little different maybe, quirky?
    • Surely a very simple: "how much does the council receive from the organisers of the Gala festival for payment for use of Peckham Rye" would smoke out a response. The "commercial sensitivity" could be because the council are giving it away or it could be because Gala don't want others to know how much they are paying - it is really tough to make money from any type of festival these days and Wide Awake in Brockwell, for example, sent out a plea for people to buy tickets via a reduced price "Tell a Friend" special offer because (they said much of it linked to the problems Lambeth were having with the High Court) things were entering "squeaky bum time"  and they were struggling to hit their break-even point. It does make me wonder whether expansion is baked-in to the agreements the council has with the organisers for events like Gala as the organisers have to be able to scale the size of the event each year to try to make money. I do also how much of the "revenue" from these events might be swallowed up by the provision of the "free community" event element of them. The comment piece in the Guardian sums it up quite nicely: The heart of this issue seems to be how cash-strapped councils are becoming increasingly beholden to commercial interests to the detriment of the public. A weekend festival that welcomes 50,000 people can expect to raise about £500,000 for local authorities. Councils argue that this money goes back in the public purse, allowing them to continue funding free community events such as Lambeth’s beloved Country Show, though there doesn’t seem to be much transparency over exactly how much cash is raised or where it is allocated.   The issue for councils may well be that if people found out how much was actually being raised by these events that the community would say the disruption is not worth it and I do wonder how much of the revenue is being swallowed up by the provision of the "free event" using the same infrastructure. Any time a council doesn't want to share something openly very much suggests that it is because they think constituents won't like the answer.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...